我花了大量时间研究各种解决方案。我不喜欢装饰器的想法，行为弄乱了验证UI，背后的代码……真的吗?

最好的方法是坚持自定义附加属性，并绑定到视图模型中的SecureString属性。尽量把它放在里面。当你需要快速访问纯密码时，使用下面的代码将其临时转换为不安全的字符串:

namespace Namespace.Extensions
{
    using System;
    using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
    using System.Security;

    /// <summary>
    /// Provides unsafe temporary operations on secured strings.
    /// </summary>
    [SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity]
    public static class SecureStringExtensions
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Converts a secured string to an unsecured string.
        /// </summary>
        public static string ToUnsecuredString(this SecureString secureString)
        {
            // copy&paste from the internal System.Net.UnsafeNclNativeMethods
            IntPtr bstrPtr = IntPtr.Zero;
            if (secureString != null)
            {
                if (secureString.Length != 0)
                {
                    try
                    {
                        bstrPtr = Marshal.SecureStringToBSTR(secureString);
                        return Marshal.PtrToStringBSTR(bstrPtr);
                    }
                    finally
                    {
                        if (bstrPtr != IntPtr.Zero)
                            Marshal.ZeroFreeBSTR(bstrPtr);
                    }
                }
            }
            return string.Empty;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Copies the existing instance of a secure string into the destination, clearing the destination beforehand.
        /// </summary>
        public static void CopyInto(this SecureString source, SecureString destination)
        {
            destination.Clear();
            foreach (var chr in source.ToUnsecuredString())
            {
                destination.AppendChar(chr);
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Converts an unsecured string to a secured string.
        /// </summary>
        public static SecureString ToSecuredString(this string plainString)
        {
            if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(plainString))
            {
                return new SecureString();
            }

            SecureString secure = new SecureString();
            foreach (char c in plainString)
            {
                secure.AppendChar(c);
            }
            return secure;
        }
    }
}

确保允许GC收集UI元素，因此不要为PasswordBox上的PasswordChanged事件使用静态事件处理程序。 我还发现了一个异常，当使用SecurePassword属性设置它时，控件没有更新UI，这就是为什么我将密码复制到password的原因。

namespace Namespace.Controls
{
    using System.Security;
    using System.Windows;
    using System.Windows.Controls;
    using Namespace.Extensions;

    /// <summary>
    /// Creates a bindable attached property for the <see cref="PasswordBox.SecurePassword"/> property.
    /// </summary>
    public static class PasswordBoxHelper
    {
        // an attached behavior won't work due to view model validation not picking up the right control to adorn
        public static readonly DependencyProperty SecurePasswordBindingProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
            "SecurePassword",
            typeof(SecureString),
            typeof(PasswordBoxHelper),
            new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(new SecureString(),FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault, AttachedPropertyValueChanged)
        );

        private static readonly DependencyProperty _passwordBindingMarshallerProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
            "PasswordBindingMarshaller",
            typeof(PasswordBindingMarshaller),
            typeof(PasswordBoxHelper),
            new PropertyMetadata()
        );

        public static void SetSecurePassword(PasswordBox element, SecureString secureString)
        {
            element.SetValue(SecurePasswordBindingProperty, secureString);
        }

        public static SecureString GetSecurePassword(PasswordBox element)
        {
            return element.GetValue(SecurePasswordBindingProperty) as SecureString;
        }

        private static void AttachedPropertyValueChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
        {
            // we'll need to hook up to one of the element's events
            // in order to allow the GC to collect the control, we'll wrap the event handler inside an object living in an attached property
            // don't be tempted to use the Unloaded event as that will be fired  even when the control is still alive and well (e.g. switching tabs in a tab control) 
            var passwordBox = (PasswordBox)d;
            var bindingMarshaller = passwordBox.GetValue(_passwordBindingMarshallerProperty) as PasswordBindingMarshaller;
            if (bindingMarshaller == null)
            {
                bindingMarshaller = new PasswordBindingMarshaller(passwordBox);
                passwordBox.SetValue(_passwordBindingMarshallerProperty, bindingMarshaller);
            }

            bindingMarshaller.UpdatePasswordBox(e.NewValue as SecureString);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Encapsulated event logic
        /// </summary>
        private class PasswordBindingMarshaller
        {
            private readonly PasswordBox _passwordBox;
            private bool _isMarshalling;

            public PasswordBindingMarshaller(PasswordBox passwordBox)
            {
                _passwordBox = passwordBox;
                _passwordBox.PasswordChanged += this.PasswordBoxPasswordChanged;
            }

            public void UpdatePasswordBox(SecureString newPassword)
            {
                if (_isMarshalling)
                {
                    return;
                }

                _isMarshalling = true;
                try
                {
                    // setting up the SecuredPassword won't trigger a visual update so we'll have to use the Password property
                    _passwordBox.Password = newPassword.ToUnsecuredString();

                    // you may try the statement below, however the benefits are minimal security wise (you still have to extract the unsecured password for copying)
                    //newPassword.CopyInto(_passwordBox.SecurePassword);
                }
                finally
                {
                    _isMarshalling = false;
                }
            }

            private void PasswordBoxPasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
            {
                // copy the password into the attached property
                if (_isMarshalling)
                {
                    return;
                }

                _isMarshalling = true;
                try
                {
                    SetSecurePassword(_passwordBox, _passwordBox.SecurePassword.Copy());
                }
                finally
                {
                    _isMarshalling = false;
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

以及XAML用法:

<PasswordBox controls:PasswordBoxHelper.SecurePassword="{Binding LogonPassword, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, ValidatesOnDataErrors=True}">

我在视图模型中的属性是这样的:

[RequiredSecureString]
public SecureString LogonPassword
{
   get
   {
       return _logonPassword;
   }
   set
   {
       _logonPassword = value;
       NotifyPropertyChanged(nameof(LogonPassword));
   }
}

RequiredSecureString只是一个简单的自定义验证器，它有以下逻辑:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Field, AllowMultiple = true)]    
public class RequiredSecureStringAttribute:ValidationAttribute
{
    public RequiredSecureStringAttribute()
        :base("Field is required")
    {            
    }

    public override bool IsValid(object value)
    {
        return (value as SecureString)?.Length > 0;
    }
}

给你。一个完整的和经过测试的纯MVVM解决方案。

为了在不破坏MVVM的情况下解决OP问题，我将使用自定义值转换器和必须从密码框中检索的值(密码)的包装器。

public interface IWrappedParameter<T>
{
    T Value { get; }
}

public class PasswordBoxWrapper : IWrappedParameter<string>
{
    private readonly PasswordBox _source;

    public string Value
    {
        get { return _source != null ? _source.Password : string.Empty; }
    }

    public PasswordBoxWrapper(PasswordBox source)
    {
        _source = source;
    }
}

public class PasswordBoxConverter : IValueConverter
{
    public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
    {
        // Implement type and value check here...
        return new PasswordBoxWrapper((PasswordBox)value);
    }

    public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
    {
        throw new InvalidOperationException("No conversion.");
    }
}

在视图模型中:

public string Username { get; set; }

public ICommand LoginCommand
{
    get
    {
        return new RelayCommand<IWrappedParameter<string>>(password => { Login(Username, password); });
    }
}

private void Login(string username, string password)
{
    // Perform login here...
}

因为视图模型使用IWrappedParameter<T>，所以它不需要任何关于PasswordBoxWrapper或PasswordBoxConverter的知识。这样您就可以将PasswordBox对象与视图模型隔离开来，并且不会破坏MVVM模式。

在视图中:

<Window.Resources>
    <h:PasswordBoxConverter x:Key="PwdConverter" />
</Window.Resources>
...
<PasswordBox Name="PwdBox" />
<Button Content="Login" Command="{Binding LoginCommand}"
        CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=PwdBox, Converter={StaticResource PwdConverter}}" />

不幸的是，我没有足够的代表来评论另一个答案:( 只是想继续“史蒂夫在指挥官”的回答。 更新他的“PasswordChanged”事件如下，如果你在一个视图上有多个PasswordBox，通过使用sender的Name属性，可以为所有的PasswordBox使用相同的PasswordChanged事件。可能有更好的方法来做到这一点，如果有任何理由不这样做，请告诉我:)

private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        if (sender is PasswordBox) { 
        if (this.DataContext != null)

        { ((dynamic)this.DataContext).GetType().GetProperty(((PasswordBox)sender).Name).SetValue((dynamic)this.DataContext, ((PasswordBox)sender).Password, null); }
    }
    }

你可以用附加属性来做，看到了吗。PasswordBox with MVVM

我使用的是简洁的mvvm友好的解决方案，还没有提到。首先，我在XAML中命名PasswordBox:

<PasswordBox x:Name="Password" />

然后我在视图构造函数中添加了一个方法调用:

public LoginWindow()
{
    InitializeComponent();
    ExposeControl<LoginViewModel>.Expose(this, view => view.Password,
        (model, box) => model.SetPasswordBox(box));
}

就是这样。当视图模型通过DataContext附加到视图时，它将收到通知，当它被分离时，它将收到另一个通知。此通知的内容可以通过lambdas进行配置，但通常它只是视图模型上的setter或方法调用，将有问题的控件作为参数传递。

通过使用视图公开接口而不是子控件，可以很容易地使它对mvvm友好。

上面的代码依赖于我博客上发布的helper类。

以下是我的看法:

Using an attached property to bind the password defeats the purpose of securing the password. The Password property of a password box is not bindable for a reason. Passing the password box as command parameter will make the ViewModel aware of the control. This will not work if you plan to make your ViewModel reusable cross platform. Don't make your VM aware of your View or any other controls. I don't think introducing a new property, an interface, subscribing to password changed events or any other complicated things is necessary for a simple task of providing the password.

XAML

<PasswordBox x:Name="pbPassword" />
<Button Content="Login" Command="{Binding LoginCommand}" x:Name="btnLogin"/>

代码背后——使用代码背后并不一定违反MVVM。只要你不把任何业务逻辑放在里面。

btnLogin.CommandParameter = new Func<string>(()=>pbPassword.Password); 

ViewModel

LoginCommand = new RelayCommand<Func<string>>(getpwd=> { service.Login(username, getpwd()); });