深度优先搜索和回溯应该在这里工作。 保存一个布尔值数组，以跟踪您以前是否访问过某个节点。如果您没有新节点可访问(不涉及已经访问过的节点)，那么只需返回并尝试不同的分支。

如果你有一个邻接表来表示图，DFS很容易实现。例如adj[A] = {B,C}表示B和C是A的子结点。

例如，下面的伪代码。“start”是开始的节点。

dfs(adj,node,visited):  
  if (visited[node]):  
    if (node == start):  
      "found a path"  
    return;  
  visited[node]=YES;  
  for child in adj[node]:  
    dfs(adj,child,visited)
  visited[node]=NO;

用开始节点调用上面的函数:

visited = {}
dfs(adj,start,visited)

在DAG中查找所有循环涉及两个步骤(算法)。

第一步是使用Tarjan的算法找到强连接组件的集合。

从任意顶点开始。 这个顶点的DFS。每个节点x保留两个数字，dfs_index[x]和dfs_lowval[x]。 Dfs_index [x]存储访问节点的时间，而dfs_lowval[x] = min(dfs_low[k]) where K是x的所有子结点在dfs生成树中不是x的父结点。 具有相同dfs_lowval[x]的所有节点都在同一个强连接组件中。

第二步是在连接的组件中找到循环(路径)。我的建议是使用改进版的Hierholzer算法。

这个想法是:

Choose any starting vertex v, and follow a trail of edges from that vertex until you return to v. It is not possible to get stuck at any vertex other than v, because the even degree of all vertices ensures that, when the trail enters another vertex w there must be an unused edge leaving w. The tour formed in this way is a closed tour, but may not cover all the vertices and edges of the initial graph. As long as there exists a vertex v that belongs to the current tour but that has adjacent edges not part of the tour, start another trail from v, following unused edges until you return to v, and join the tour formed in this way to the previous tour.

下面是带有测试用例的Java实现的链接:

http://stones333.blogspot.com/2013/12/find-cycles-in-directed-graph-dag.html

深度优先搜索和回溯应该在这里工作。 保存一个布尔值数组，以跟踪您以前是否访问过某个节点。如果您没有新节点可访问(不涉及已经访问过的节点)，那么只需返回并尝试不同的分支。

如果你有一个邻接表来表示图，DFS很容易实现。例如adj[A] = {B,C}表示B和C是A的子结点。

例如，下面的伪代码。“start”是开始的节点。

dfs(adj,node,visited):  
  if (visited[node]):  
    if (node == start):  
      "found a path"  
    return;  
  visited[node]=YES;  
  for child in adj[node]:  
    dfs(adj,child,visited)
  visited[node]=NO;

用开始节点调用上面的函数:

visited = {}
dfs(adj,start,visited)

从开始节点s开始的DFS，在遍历过程中跟踪DFS路径，如果在到s的路径中发现从节点v开始的边，则记录该路径。(v,s)是DFS树中的后边，因此表示包含s的周期。

CXXGraph库提供了一组检测周期的算法和函数。

要获得完整的算法解释，请访问wiki。

澄清:

Strongly Connected Components will find all subgraphs that have at least one cycle in them, not all possible cycles in the graph. e.g. if you take all strongly connected components and collapse/group/merge each one of them into one node (i.e. a node per component), you'll get a tree with no cycles (a DAG actually). Each component (which is basically a subgraph with at least one cycle in it) can contain many more possible cycles internally, so SCC will NOT find all possible cycles, it will find all possible groups that have at least one cycle, and if you group them, then the graph will not have cycles. to find all simple cycles in a graph, as others mentioned, Johnson's algorithm is a candidate.