I'm trying to create a thumbnail image on the client side using javascript and a canvas element, but when I shrink the image down, it looks terrible. It looks as if it was downsized in photoshop with the resampling set to 'Nearest Neighbor' instead of Bicubic. I know its possible to get this to look right, because this site can do it just fine using a canvas as well. I've tried using the same code they do as shown in the "[Source]" link, but it still looks terrible. Is there something I'm missing, some setting that needs to be set or something?

编辑:

我正在调整一张jpg图片的大小。我试过在链接的网站和photoshop中调整相同的jpg图片的大小,缩小后看起来很好。

以下是相关代码:

reader.onloadend = function(e)
{
    var img = new Image();
    var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
    var canvasCopy = document.createElement("canvas");
    var copyContext = canvasCopy.getContext("2d");

    img.onload = function()
    {
        var ratio = 1;

        if(img.width > maxWidth)
            ratio = maxWidth / img.width;
        else if(img.height > maxHeight)
            ratio = maxHeight / img.height;

        canvasCopy.width = img.width;
        canvasCopy.height = img.height;
        copyContext.drawImage(img, 0, 0);

        canvas.width = img.width * ratio;
        canvas.height = img.height * ratio;
        ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvasCopy.width, canvasCopy.height, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
    };

    img.src = reader.result;
}

EDIT2:

看来我错了,链接网站并没有做任何更好的工作缩小图像。我尝试了其他建议的方法,没有一个看起来更好。这就是不同方法的结果:

ps:

帆布:

使用图像渲染:optimizeQuality设置并按宽度/高度缩放:

使用-moz-transform设置和缩放:

Canvas在pixastic上调整大小:

我猜这意味着firefox没有像它应该的那样使用双三次抽样。我只能等他们真的加进去了。

EDIT3:

原始图像


当前回答

谢谢@syockit的精彩回答。然而,我不得不重新格式化如下使它工作。可能是由于DOM扫描问题:

$(document).ready(function () {

$('img').on("load", clickA);
function clickA() {
    var img = this;
    var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
    new thumbnailer(canvas, img, 50, 3);
    document.body.appendChild(canvas);
}

function thumbnailer(elem, img, sx, lobes) {
    this.canvas = elem;
    elem.width = img.width;
    elem.height = img.height;
    elem.style.display = "none";
    this.ctx = elem.getContext("2d");
    this.ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
    this.img = img;
    this.src = this.ctx.getImageData(0, 0, img.width, img.height);
    this.dest = {
        width: sx,
        height: Math.round(img.height * sx / img.width)
    };
    this.dest.data = new Array(this.dest.width * this.dest.height * 3);
    this.lanczos = lanczosCreate(lobes);
    this.ratio = img.width / sx;
    this.rcp_ratio = 2 / this.ratio;
    this.range2 = Math.ceil(this.ratio * lobes / 2);
    this.cacheLanc = {};
    this.center = {};
    this.icenter = {};
    setTimeout(process1, 0, this, 0);
}

//returns a function that calculates lanczos weight
function lanczosCreate(lobes) {
    return function (x) {
        if (x > lobes)
            return 0;
        x *= Math.PI;
        if (Math.abs(x) < 1e-16)
            return 1
        var xx = x / lobes;
        return Math.sin(x) * Math.sin(xx) / x / xx;
    }
}

process1 = function (self, u) {
    self.center.x = (u + 0.5) * self.ratio;
    self.icenter.x = Math.floor(self.center.x);
    for (var v = 0; v < self.dest.height; v++) {
        self.center.y = (v + 0.5) * self.ratio;
        self.icenter.y = Math.floor(self.center.y);
        var a, r, g, b;
        a = r = g = b = 0;
        for (var i = self.icenter.x - self.range2; i <= self.icenter.x + self.range2; i++) {
            if (i < 0 || i >= self.src.width)
                continue;
            var f_x = Math.floor(1000 * Math.abs(i - self.center.x));
            if (!self.cacheLanc[f_x])
                self.cacheLanc[f_x] = {};
            for (var j = self.icenter.y - self.range2; j <= self.icenter.y + self.range2; j++) {
                if (j < 0 || j >= self.src.height)
                    continue;
                var f_y = Math.floor(1000 * Math.abs(j - self.center.y));
                if (self.cacheLanc[f_x][f_y] == undefined)
                    self.cacheLanc[f_x][f_y] = self.lanczos(Math.sqrt(Math.pow(f_x * self.rcp_ratio, 2) + Math.pow(f_y * self.rcp_ratio, 2)) / 1000);
                weight = self.cacheLanc[f_x][f_y];
                if (weight > 0) {
                    var idx = (j * self.src.width + i) * 4;
                    a += weight;
                    r += weight * self.src.data[idx];
                    g += weight * self.src.data[idx + 1];
                    b += weight * self.src.data[idx + 2];
                }
            }
        }
        var idx = (v * self.dest.width + u) * 3;
        self.dest.data[idx] = r / a;
        self.dest.data[idx + 1] = g / a;
        self.dest.data[idx + 2] = b / a;
    }

    if (++u < self.dest.width)
        setTimeout(process1, 0, self, u);
    else
        setTimeout(process2, 0, self);
};

process2 = function (self) {
    self.canvas.width = self.dest.width;
    self.canvas.height = self.dest.height;
    self.ctx.drawImage(self.img, 0, 0);
    self.src = self.ctx.getImageData(0, 0, self.dest.width, self.dest.height);
    var idx, idx2;
    for (var i = 0; i < self.dest.width; i++) {
        for (var j = 0; j < self.dest.height; j++) {
            idx = (j * self.dest.width + i) * 3;
            idx2 = (j * self.dest.width + i) * 4;
            self.src.data[idx2] = self.dest.data[idx];
            self.src.data[idx2 + 1] = self.dest.data[idx + 1];
            self.src.data[idx2 + 2] = self.dest.data[idx + 2];
        }
    }
    self.ctx.putImageData(self.src, 0, 0);
    self.canvas.style.display = "block";
}
});

其他回答

我有一种感觉,我写的模块将产生类似于photoshop的结果,因为它通过平均颜色数据来保存它们,而不是应用算法。它有点慢,但对我来说是最好的,因为它保留了所有的颜色数据。

https://github.com/danschumann/limby-resize/blob/master/lib/canvas_resize.js

它不会选取最近的邻居并删除其他像素,也不会对一组进行抽样并随机取平均值。它取每个源像素输出到目标像素的精确比例。源点的平均像素颜色就是目标点的平均像素颜色,我认为其他公式不是这样的。

如何使用的例子是在底部 https://github.com/danschumann/limby-resize

2018年10月更新:这些天我的例子比其他任何东西都更学术。Webgl几乎是100%,所以你最好用它来调整大小,以产生类似的结果,但更快。我相信PICA.js就是这么做的。- - - - - -

如果你只是想调整图像的大小,我建议用CSS设置图像的宽度和高度。这里有一个简单的例子:

.small-image {
    width: 100px;
    height: 100px;
}

注意,高度和宽度也可以使用JavaScript设置。下面是快速代码示例:

var img = document.getElement("my-image");
img.style.width = 100 + "px";  // Make sure you add the "px" to the end,
img.style.height = 100 + "px"; // otherwise you'll confuse IE

此外,为了确保调整大小的图像看起来不错,在图像选择器中添加以下css规则:

-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic:在IE7中引入 图像渲染:optimizeQuality:在FireFox 3.6中引入

据我所知,除了IE之外,所有浏览器都默认使用双三次算法来调整图像大小,所以你调整后的图像在Firefox和Chrome中应该看起来不错。

如果设置css的宽度和高度不工作,你可能想玩一个css转换:

-moz-transform: scale(sx[, sy]) -webkit-transform:规模(sx (sy))

如果出于任何原因你需要使用画布,请注意有两种方法可以调整图像的大小:通过css调整画布的大小或以较小的尺寸绘制图像。

请参阅这个问题了解更多细节。

还在寻找另一个简单的解决方案吗?

var img=document.createElement('img');
img.src=canvas.toDataURL();
$(img).css("background", backgroundColor);
$(img).width(settings.width);
$(img).height(settings.height);

这个解决方案将使用浏览器的调整大小算法!:)

我刚刚运行了一个并排比较的页面,除非最近发生了一些变化,否则我看不到更好的缩小(缩放)使用canvas vs.简单的css。我在FF6 Mac OSX 10.7中进行了测试。和原版相比还是有点软。

然而,我确实偶然发现了一些确实产生巨大差异的东西,那就是在支持画布的浏览器中使用图像过滤器。实际上,你可以像在Photoshop中一样对图像进行模糊、锐化、饱和度、纹波、灰度等操作。

然后我发现了一个很棒的jQuery插件,使这些过滤器的应用程序一个快照: http://codecanyon.net/item/jsmanipulate-jquery-image-manipulation-plugin/428234

我只是在调整图像大小后应用锐化滤镜,这应该会给你想要的效果。我甚至不需要使用canvas元素。

我通过右键单击firefox中的canvas元素并另存为来获得这张图像。

var img = new Image();
img.onload = function () {
    console.debug(this.width,this.height);
    var canvas = document.createElement('canvas'), ctx;
    canvas.width = 188;
    canvas.height = 150;
    document.body.appendChild(canvas);
    ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
    ctx.drawImage(img,0,0,188,150);
};
img.src = 'original.jpg';

不管怎样,这是你的例子的“固定”版本:

var img = new Image();
// added cause it wasnt defined
var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
document.body.appendChild(canvas);

var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
var canvasCopy = document.createElement("canvas");
// adding it to the body

document.body.appendChild(canvasCopy);

var copyContext = canvasCopy.getContext("2d");

img.onload = function()
{
        var ratio = 1;

        // defining cause it wasnt
        var maxWidth = 188,
            maxHeight = 150;

        if(img.width > maxWidth)
                ratio = maxWidth / img.width;
        else if(img.height > maxHeight)
                ratio = maxHeight / img.height;

        canvasCopy.width = img.width;
        canvasCopy.height = img.height;
        copyContext.drawImage(img, 0, 0);

        canvas.width = img.width * ratio;
        canvas.height = img.height * ratio;
        // the line to change
        // ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvasCopy.width, canvasCopy.height, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
        // the method signature you are using is for slicing
        ctx.drawImage(canvasCopy, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
};

// changed for example
img.src = 'original.jpg';