比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
无答案展示了增强的getopt。最热门的答案是误导性的:要么忽略-vfd样式的短选项(OP请求)或位置参数后的选项(OP也请求);并且它忽略解析错误。相反:
使用util-linux或以前的GNUglibc.1中的增强getopt它与GNUglibc的C函数getopt_long()一起工作。本页上没有其他解决方案可以做到这一切:在arguments 2中处理空格、引用字符甚至二进制(非增强型getopt无法做到这一点)它可以在结尾处处理选项:script.sh-o outFile file1 file2-v(getopts不执行此操作)allows=-style long选项:script.sh--outfile=fileOut--infile fileIn(如果自解析,则允许两者都很长)允许组合的短选项,例如-vfd(如果是自解析,则实际工作)允许触摸选项参数,例如-oOutfile或-vfdoOutfile它太旧了,以至于没有GNU系统缺少它(例如,任何Linux都有它)。您可以使用:getopt--test测试它的存在→ 返回值4。其他getopt或shell内置getopt用途有限。
以下通话
myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
myscript -v -f -d -o/fizz/someOtherFile -- ./foo/bar/someFile
myscript --verbose --force --debug ./foo/bar/someFile -o/fizz/someOtherFile
myscript --output=/fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile -vfd
myscript ./foo/bar/someFile -df -v --output /fizz/someOtherFile
全部返回
verbose: y, force: y, debug: y, in: ./foo/bar/someFile, out: /fizz/someOtherFile
使用以下myscript
#!/bin/bash
# More safety, by turning some bugs into errors.
# Without `errexit` you don’t need ! and can replace
# ${PIPESTATUS[0]} with a simple $?, but I prefer safety.
set -o errexit -o pipefail -o noclobber -o nounset
# -allow a command to fail with !’s side effect on errexit
# -use return value from ${PIPESTATUS[0]}, because ! hosed $?
! getopt --test > /dev/null
if [[ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 4 ]]; then
echo 'I’m sorry, `getopt --test` failed in this environment.'
exit 1
fi
# option --output/-o requires 1 argument
LONGOPTS=debug,force,output:,verbose
OPTIONS=dfo:v
# -regarding ! and PIPESTATUS see above
# -temporarily store output to be able to check for errors
# -activate quoting/enhanced mode (e.g. by writing out “--options”)
# -pass arguments only via -- "$@" to separate them correctly
! PARSED=$(getopt --options=$OPTIONS --longoptions=$LONGOPTS --name "$0" -- "$@")
if [[ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 0 ]]; then
# e.g. return value is 1
# then getopt has complained about wrong arguments to stdout
exit 2
fi
# read getopt’s output this way to handle the quoting right:
eval set -- "$PARSED"
d=n f=n v=n outFile=-
# now enjoy the options in order and nicely split until we see --
while true; do
case "$1" in
-d|--debug)
d=y
shift
;;
-f|--force)
f=y
shift
;;
-v|--verbose)
v=y
shift
;;
-o|--output)
outFile="$2"
shift 2
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
*)
echo "Programming error"
exit 3
;;
esac
done
# handle non-option arguments
if [[ $# -ne 1 ]]; then
echo "$0: A single input file is required."
exit 4
fi
echo "verbose: $v, force: $f, debug: $d, in: $1, out: $outFile"
1增强的getopt可用于大多数“bash系统”,包括Cygwin;在OS X上,尝试brew安装gnu getopt或sudo端口安装getopt2 POSIX exec()约定没有可靠的方法在命令行参数中传递二进制NULL;这些字节过早地结束了参数3 1997年或之前发布的第一个版本(我只追溯到1997年)
其他回答
来自digitalpeer.com,稍作修改:
用法myscript.sh-p=my_prefix-s=dirname-l=libname
#!/bin/bash
for i in "$@"
do
case $i in
-p=*|--prefix=*)
PREFIX="${i#*=}"
;;
-s=*|--searchpath=*)
SEARCHPATH="${i#*=}"
;;
-l=*|--lib=*)
DIR="${i#*=}"
;;
--default)
DEFAULT=YES
;;
*)
# unknown option
;;
esac
done
echo PREFIX = ${PREFIX}
echo SEARCH PATH = ${SEARCHPATH}
echo DIRS = ${DIR}
echo DEFAULT = ${DEFAULT}
要更好地理解${i#*=},请在本指南中搜索“Substring Removal”。它在功能上等同于调用一个不需要的子流程的‘sed’s/[^=]*=//'<<<“$i”`或调用两个不需要子流程的“echo”$i”|sed’s/[^=]*=//'`。
我想提供我的选项解析版本,它允许以下内容:
-s p1
--stage p1
-w somefolder
--workfolder somefolder
-sw p1 somefolder
-e=hello
也允许这样做(可能不需要):
-s--workfolder p1 somefolder
-se=hello p1
-swe=hello p1 somefolder
您必须在使用前决定是否在选项上使用=。这是为了保持代码干净。
while [[ $# > 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
while [[ ${key+x} ]]
do
case $key in
-s*|--stage)
STAGE="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-w*|--workfolder)
workfolder="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-e=*)
EXAMPLE="${key#*=}"
break # option has been fully handled
;;
*)
# unknown option
echo Unknown option: $key #1>&2
exit 10 # either this: my preferred way to handle unknown options
break # or this: do this to signal the option has been handled (if exit isn't used)
;;
esac
# prepare for next option in this key, if any
[[ "$key" = -? || "$key" == --* ]] && unset key || key="${key/#-?/-}"
done
shift # option(s) fully processed, proceed to next input argument
done
保留未处理参数的解决方案。包括演示。
这是我的解决方案。它非常灵活,不像其他软件包,不需要外部包,并且可以干净地处理遗留的参数。
用法为:/myscript-flag flag变量-otherflag flagvar2
您所要做的就是编辑有效标记行。它在前面加上连字符并搜索所有参数。然后它将下一个参数定义为标志名,例如。
./myscript -flag flagvariable -otherflag flagvar2
echo $flag $otherflag
flagvariable flagvar2
主要代码(简短的版本,详细的示例,以及错误输出的版本):
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
match=0
argval=$1
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "1" ]
then
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
shift $#
set -- $leftovers
带有内置echo演示的详细版本:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
rate=30
time=30
number=30
echo "all args
$@"
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
match=0
argval=$1
# argval=$(echo $@ | cut -d ' ' -f$count)
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "1" ]
then
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
echo "pre final clear args:
$@"
shift $#
echo "post final clear args:
$@"
set -- $leftovers
echo "all post set args:
$@"
echo arg1: $1 arg2: $2
echo leftovers: $leftovers
echo rate $rate time $time number $number
最后一个,如果传递了一个无效的参数,这一个会出错。
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#shebang.io
rate=30
time=30
number=30
validflags="rate time number"
count=1
for arg in $@
do
argval=$1
match=0
if [ "${argval:0:1}" == "-" ]
then
for flag in $validflags
do
sflag="-"$flag
if [ "$argval" == "$sflag" ]
then
declare $flag=$2
match=1
fi
done
if [ "$match" == "0" ]
then
echo "Bad argument: $argval"
exit 1
fi
shift 2
else
leftovers=$(echo $leftovers $argval)
shift
fi
count=$(($count+1))
done
#Cleanup then restore the leftovers
shift $#
set -- $leftovers
echo rate $rate time $time number $number
echo leftovers: $leftovers
优点:不管怎么说,它处理得很好。它保留了许多其他解决方案所没有的未使用的参数。它还允许调用变量,而无需在脚本中手动定义。如果没有给出相应的参数,它还允许预填充变量。(请参阅详细示例)。
缺点:无法解析单个复杂的arg字符串,例如-xcvf将作为单个参数处理。不过,您可以很容易地在我的代码中编写额外的代码,以添加此功能。
根据这里的其他答案,这是我的版本:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
function parse() {
for arg in "$@"; do # transform long options to short ones
shift
case "$arg" in
"--name") set -- "$@" "-n" ;;
"--verbose") set -- "$@" "-v" ;;
*) set -- "$@" "$arg"
esac
done
while getopts "n:v" optname # left to ":" are flags that expect a value, right to the ":" are flags that expect nothing
do
case "$optname" in
"n") name=${OPTARG} ;;
"v") verbose=true ;;
esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # shift out all the already processed options
}
parse "$@"
echo "hello $name"
if [ ! -z $verbose ]; then echo 'nice to meet you!'; fi
用法:
$ ./parse.sh
hello
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME -v
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v
hello
nice to meet you!
假设我们创建一个名为test_args.sh的shell脚本,如下所示
#!/bin/sh
until [ $# -eq 0 ]
do
name=${1:1}; shift;
if [[ -z "$1" || $1 == -* ]] ; then eval "export $name=true"; else eval "export $name=$1"; shift; fi
done
echo "year=$year month=$month day=$day flag=$flag"
运行以下命令后:
sh test_args.sh -year 2017 -flag -month 12 -day 22
输出将是:
year=2017 month=12 day=22 flag=true