有什么办法能让这看起来好一点吗?
conn.exec 'select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7 ' +
'from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, ' +
'where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc'
比如,有没有办法暗示串联?
有什么办法能让这看起来好一点吗?
conn.exec 'select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7 ' +
'from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, ' +
'where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc'
比如,有没有办法暗示串联?
当前回答
像你一样,我也在寻找一个不包括换行符的解决方案。(虽然它们在SQL中可能是安全的,但在我的情况下不安全,我有一个大的文本块要处理)
这可以说是同样丑陋,但你可以在heredoc中反斜杠转义换行符,以从结果字符串中省略它们:
conn.exec <<~END_OF_INPUT
select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7 \
from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, \
where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc
END_OF_INPUT
请注意,如果没有插值(即<<~'END_OF_INPUT'),就不能执行此操作,所以要小心。#{expressions}将在这里求值,而在原始代码中不会求值。答:出于这个原因,威尔逊的回答可能更好。
其他回答
你也可以使用双引号
x = """
this is
a multiline
string
"""
2.3.3 :012 > x
=> "\nthis is\na multiline\nstring\n"
如果需要删除换行符“\n”,请在每行末尾使用反斜杠“\”
这个答案中有一些部分帮助我得到了我需要的东西(简单的多行连接,没有额外的空格),但由于没有实际的答案,我在这里编译它们:
str = 'this is a multi-line string'\
' using implicit concatenation'\
' to prevent spare \n\'s'
=> "this is a multi-line string using implicit concatenation to eliminate spare
\\n's"
作为奖励,这里有一个使用有趣的HEREDOC语法的版本(通过这个链接):
p <<END_SQL.gsub(/\s+/, " ").strip
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY users.id DESC
END_SQL
# >> "SELECT * FROM users ORDER BY users.id DESC"
The latter would mostly be for situations that required more flexibility in the processing. I personally don't like it, it puts the processing in a weird place w.r.t. the string (i.e., in front of it, but using instance methods that usually come afterward), but it's there. Note that if you are indenting the last END_SQL identifier (which is common, since this is probably inside a function or module), you will need to use the hyphenated syntax (that is, p <<-END_SQL instead of p <<END_SQL). Otherwise, the indenting whitespace causes the identifier to be interpreted as a continuation of the string.
这并没有节省太多的输入,但对我来说,它看起来比使用+号更好。
此外(我在几年后的编辑中说过),如果您使用Ruby 2.3+,操作符<<~也可用,它从最终字符串中删除额外的缩进。在这种情况下,您应该能够删除.gsub调用(尽管这可能取决于开始缩进和最终需求)。
编辑:再加一个:
p %{
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY users.id DESC
}.gsub(/\s+/, " ").strip
# >> "SELECT * FROM users ORDER BY users.id DESC"
是的,如果你不介意额外的换行被插入:
conn.exec 'select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7
from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,
where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc'
你也可以使用heredoc:
conn.exec <<-eos
select attr1, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, attr6, attr7
from table1, table2, table3, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,
where etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc
eos
其他选项:
#multi line string
multiline_string = <<EOM
This is a very long string
that contains interpolation
like #{4 + 5} \n\n
EOM
puts multiline_string
#another option for multiline string
message = <<-EOF
asdfasdfsador #{2+2} this month.
asdfadsfasdfadsfad.
EOF
puts message
今天的优雅回答:
<<~TEXT
Hi #{user.name},
Thanks for raising the flag, we're always happy to help you.
Your issue will be resolved within 2 hours.
Please be patient!
Thanks again,
Team #{user.organization.name}
TEXT
<<-TEXT和<<~TEXT有区别,前者保留了块内的空格,后者则没有。
还有其他的选择。 比如串联等等,但这个更有意义。
如果我错了,请告诉我…