random.choice的加权版本

我需要写一个加权版的random。选择(列表中的每个元素有不同的被选择的概率)。这是我想到的:

def weightedChoice(choices):
    """Like random.choice, but each element can have a different chance of
    being selected.

    choices can be any iterable containing iterables with two items each.
    Technically, they can have more than two items, the rest will just be
    ignored.  The first item is the thing being chosen, the second item is
    its weight.  The weights can be any numeric values, what matters is the
    relative differences between them.
    """
    space = {}
    current = 0
    for choice, weight in choices:
        if weight > 0:
            space[current] = choice
            current += weight
    rand = random.uniform(0, current)
    for key in sorted(space.keys() + [current]):
        if rand < key:
            return choice
        choice = space[key]
    return None

这个函数对我来说太复杂了，而且很丑。我希望这里的每个人都能提供一些改进的建议或其他方法。对我来说，效率没有代码的整洁和可读性重要。

当前回答

如果您的加权选项列表是相对静态的，并且您希望频繁采样，则可以执行一个O(N)预处理步骤，然后使用相关答案中的函数在O(1)中进行选择。

# run only when `choices` changes.
preprocessed_data = prep(weight for _,weight in choices)

# O(1) selection
value = choices[sample(preprocessed_data)][0]

2015-04-21 17:42:55

其他回答

通解:

import random
def weighted_choice(choices, weights):
    total = sum(weights)
    treshold = random.uniform(0, total)
    for k, weight in enumerate(weights):
        total -= weight
        if total < treshold:
            return choices[k]

2013-06-09 15:26:44

在Udacity免费课程AI for Robotics中，Sebastien Thurn对此进行了演讲。基本上，他用mod运算符%做了一个权重索引的圆形数组，将变量beta设为0，随机选择一个索引， for循环遍历N，其中N是指标的数量，在for循环中，首先按公式增加beta:

Beta = Beta +来自{0…2 * Weight_max}

然后在for循环中嵌套一个while循环per:

while w[index] < beta:
    beta = beta - w[index]
    index = index + 1

select p[index]

然后到下一个索引，根据概率(或课程中介绍的情况下的归一化概率)重新采样。

在Udacity上找到第8课，机器人人工智能的第21期视频，他正在讲粒子滤波器。

2019-12-22 22:39:50

为random.choice()提供一个预先加权的列表:

解决方案和测试:

import random

options = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
weights = [1, 2, 5, 2]

weighted_options = [[opt]*wgt for opt, wgt in zip(options, weights)]
weighted_options = [opt for sublist in weighted_options for opt in sublist]
print(weighted_options)

# test

counts = {c: 0 for c in options}
for x in range(10000):
    counts[random.choice(weighted_options)] += 1

for opt, wgt in zip(options, weights):
    wgt_r = counts[opt] / 10000 * sum(weights)
    print(opt, counts[opt], wgt, wgt_r)

输出:

['a', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'd', 'd']
a 1025 1 1.025
b 1948 2 1.948
c 5019 5 5.019
d 2008 2 2.008

2019-10-02 18:37:14

def weighted_choice(choices):
   total = sum(w for c, w in choices)
   r = random.uniform(0, total)
   upto = 0
   for c, w in choices:
      if upto + w >= r:
         return c
      upto += w
   assert False, "Shouldn't get here"

2010-09-09 19:08:40

我可能已经来不及提供任何有用的东西了，但这里有一个简单，简短，非常有效的片段:

def choose_index(probabilies):
    cmf = probabilies[0]
    choice = random.random()
    for k in xrange(len(probabilies)):
        if choice <= cmf:
            return k
        else:
            cmf += probabilies[k+1]

不需要排序你的概率或用你的cmf创建一个向量，它一旦找到它的选择就会终止。内存:O(1)，时间:O(N)，平均运行时间~ N/2。

如果你有权重，只需添加一行:

def choose_index(weights):
    probabilities = weights / sum(weights)
    cmf = probabilies[0]
    choice = random.random()
    for k in xrange(len(probabilies)):
        if choice <= cmf:
            return k
        else:
            cmf += probabilies[k+1]

2015-01-27 21:55:52

random.choice的加权版本

推荐文章

最新文章

标签