这只是我的个人意见。 为了克服CountDownLatch预先知道任务数量的要求，您可以使用简单的Semaphore来使用旧的方式。

ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
int numberOfTasks=0;
Semaphore s=new Semaphore(0);
while(...) {
    taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
    numberOfTasks++;
}

try {
    s.aquire(numberOfTasks);
...

在任务中调用s.release()就像调用latch.countDown()一样;

你可以在这个Runner类上调用waitTillDone():

Runner runner = Runner.runner(4); // create pool with 4 threads in thread pool

while(...) {
    runner.run(new MyTask()); // here you submit your task
}


runner.waitTillDone(); // and this blocks until all tasks are finished (or failed)


runner.shutdown(); // once you done you can shutdown the runner

在调用shutdown()之前，您可以重用这个类并多次调用waitTillDone()，而且您的代码非常简单。你也不需要预先知道任务的数量。

要使用它，只需将gradle/maven compile 'com.github.matejtymes:javafixes:1.3.1'依赖项添加到你的项目中。

详情请点击这里:

https://github.com/MatejTymes/JavaFixes

使用CountDownLatch:

CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(totalNumberOfTasks);
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
while(...) {
  taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
}

try {
  latch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException E) {
   // handle
}

在任务中(在try / finally中附上)

latch.countDown();

你也可以使用期货列表:

List<Future> futures = new ArrayList<Future>();
// now add to it:
futures.add(executorInstance.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
  public Void call() throws IOException {
     // do something
    return null;
  }
}));

然后当你想要连接所有线程时，它本质上等同于连接每个线程，(额外的好处是它会从子线程重新引发异常到主线程):

for(Future f: this.futures) { f.get(); }

Basically the trick is to call .get() on each Future one at a time, instead of infinite looping calling isDone() on (all or each). So you're guaranteed to "move on" through and past this block as soon as the last thread finishes. The caveat is that since the .get() call re-raises exceptions, if one of the threads dies, you would raise from this possibly before the other threads have finished to completion [to avoid this, you could add a catch ExecutionException around the get call]. The other caveat is it keeps a reference to all threads so if they have thread local variables they won't get collected till after you get past this block (though you might be able to get around this, if it became a problem, by removing Future's off the ArrayList). If you wanted to know which Future "finishes first" you could use some something like https://stackoverflow.com/a/31885029/32453

如果你连续使用了更多的ExecutionServices线程，并且想要等待每个EXECUTIONSERVICE完成。最好的办法是像下面这样;

ExecutorService executer1 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_SIZE1);
for (<loop>) {
   executer1.execute(new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                ...
            }
        });
} 
executer1.shutdown();

try{
   executer1.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);

   ExecutorService executer2 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_SIZE2);
   for (true) {
      executer2.execute(new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                 ...
            }
        });
   } 
   executer2.shutdown();
} catch (Exception e){
 ...
}

ExecutorService.invokeAll()为您完成。

ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
List<Callable<?>> tasks; // your tasks
// invokeAll() returns when all tasks are complete
List<Future<?>> futures = taskExecutor.invokeAll(tasks);