我需要一次执行一定数量的任务4，就像这样:
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
while(...) {
taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
}
//...wait for completion somehow
当所有这些都完成后，我如何得到通知?现在我想不出比设置一些全局任务计数器更好的方法，并在每个任务结束时减少它，然后在无限循环中监视这个计数器变成0;或获取一个期货列表，并在无限循环监视器isDone为所有它们。不涉及无限循环的更好的解决方案是什么?
谢谢。
当前回答
在执行器getActiveCount() -中有一个方法可以给出活动线程的计数。
在跨越线程之后，我们可以检查activeCount()值是否为0。一旦该值为零，就意味着当前没有活动线程在运行，这意味着任务已经完成:
while (true) {
if (executor.getActiveCount() == 0) {
//ur own piece of code
break;
}
}
其他回答
您可以使用自己的ExecutorCompletionService子类来包装taskExecutor，并使用自己的BlockingQueue实现在每个任务完成时获得通知，并在完成的任务数量达到预期目标时执行任何回调或其他操作。
你应该使用executorService.shutdown()和executorService。awaitTermination方法。
示例如下:
public class ScheduledThreadPoolExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
ScheduledExecutorService executorService = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(5);
executorService.scheduleAtFixedRate(() -> System.out.println("process task."),
0, 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(10);
executorService.shutdown();
executorService.awaitTermination(1, TimeUnit.DAYS);
}
}
这只是我的个人意见。 为了克服CountDownLatch预先知道任务数量的要求，您可以使用简单的Semaphore来使用旧的方式。
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
int numberOfTasks=0;
Semaphore s=new Semaphore(0);
while(...) {
taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
numberOfTasks++;
}
try {
s.aquire(numberOfTasks);
...
在任务中调用s.release()就像调用latch.countDown()一样;
你也可以使用期货列表:
List<Future> futures = new ArrayList<Future>();
// now add to it:
futures.add(executorInstance.submit(new Callable<Void>() {
public Void call() throws IOException {
// do something
return null;
}
}));
然后当你想要连接所有线程时，它本质上等同于连接每个线程，(额外的好处是它会从子线程重新引发异常到主线程):
for(Future f: this.futures) { f.get(); }
Basically the trick is to call .get() on each Future one at a time, instead of infinite looping calling isDone() on (all or each). So you're guaranteed to "move on" through and past this block as soon as the last thread finishes. The caveat is that since the .get() call re-raises exceptions, if one of the threads dies, you would raise from this possibly before the other threads have finished to completion [to avoid this, you could add a catch ExecutionException around the get call]. The other caveat is it keeps a reference to all threads so if they have thread local variables they won't get collected till after you get past this block (though you might be able to get around this, if it became a problem, by removing Future's off the ArrayList). If you wanted to know which Future "finishes first" you could use some something like https://stackoverflow.com/a/31885029/32453
基本上在ExecutorService上调用shutdown()，然后调用awaitterminate ():
ExecutorService taskExecutor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
while(...) {
taskExecutor.execute(new MyTask());
}
taskExecutor.shutdown();
try {
taskExecutor.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
...
}
