如果你的数组太大，你应该使用BitArray。它为每个bool值使用1位，而不是一个字节(就像在bool数组中一样)，您还可以使用位操作符将所有位设置为true。或者在true上初始化。如果你只需要做一次，它只会花费更多。

System.Collections.BitArray falses = new System.Collections.BitArray(100000, false);
System.Collections.BitArray trues = new System.Collections.BitArray(100000, true);

// Now both contain only true values.
falses.And(trues);

如果你使用的是。net Core， . net Standard >= 2.1，或者依赖于系统。内存包，你也可以使用Span<T>.Fill()方法:

var valueToFill = 165;
var data = new int[100];

data.AsSpan().Fill(valueToFill);

// print array content
for (int i = 0; i < data.Length; i++)
{
    Console.WriteLine(data[i]);
}

https://dotnetfiddle.net/UsJ9bu

这里给出的许多答案都可以归结为一个循环，每次初始化数组中的一个元素，它没有利用设计为一次操作内存块的CPU指令。

. net Standard 2.1(在撰写本文时的预览版中)提供了Array.Fill()，这有助于在运行时库中实现高性能(尽管到目前为止，. net Core似乎还没有利用这种可能性)。

For those on earlier platforms, the following extension method outperforms a trivial loop by a substantial margin when the array size is significant. I created it when my solution for an online code challenge was around 20% over the allocated time budget. It reduced the runtime by around 70%. In this case, the array fill was performed inside another loop. BLOCK_SIZE was set by gut feeling rather than experiment. Some optimizations are possible (e.g. copying all bytes already set to the desired value rather than a fixed-size block).

internal const int BLOCK_SIZE = 256;
public static void Fill<T>(this T[] array, T value)
{
    if (array.Length < 2 * BLOCK_SIZE)
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++) array[i] = value;
    }
    else
    {
        int fullBlocks = array.Length / BLOCK_SIZE;
        // Initialize first block
        for (int j = 0; j < BLOCK_SIZE; j++) array[j] = value;
        // Copy successive full blocks
        for (int blk = 1; blk < fullBlocks; blk++)
        {
            Array.Copy(array, 0, array, blk * BLOCK_SIZE, BLOCK_SIZE);
        }

        for (int rem = fullBlocks * BLOCK_SIZE; rem < array.Length; rem++)
        {
            array[rem] = value;
        }
    }
}

只是一个基准:

BenchmarkDotNet=v0.12.1, OS=Windows 10.0.18363.997 (1909/November2018Update/19H2)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ CPU 2.60GHz (Skylake), 1 CPU, 8 logical and 4 physical cores
.NET Core SDK=3.1.302
  [Host]        : .NET Core 3.1.6 (CoreCLR 4.700.20.26901, CoreFX 4.700.20.31603), X64 RyuJIT
  .NET Core 3.1 : .NET Core 3.1.6 (CoreCLR 4.700.20.26901, CoreFX 4.700.20.31603), X64 RyuJIT

Job=.NET Core 3.1  Runtime=.NET Core 3.1

|           Method |     Mean |     Error |    StdDev |
|----------------- |---------:|----------:|----------:|
| EnumerableRepeat | 2.311 us | 0.0228 us | 0.0213 us |
|  NewArrayForEach | 2.007 us | 0.0392 us | 0.0348 us |
|        ArrayFill | 2.426 us | 0.0103 us | 0.0092 us |

    [SimpleJob(BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs.RuntimeMoniker.NetCoreApp31)]
    public class InitializeArrayBenchmark {
        const int ArrayLength = 1600;

        [Benchmark]
        public double[] EnumerableRepeat() {
            return Enumerable.Repeat(double.PositiveInfinity, ArrayLength).ToArray();
        }

        [Benchmark]
        public double[] NewArrayForEach() {
            var array = new double[ArrayLength];

            for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++) {
                array[i] = double.PositiveInfinity;
            }

            return array;
        }

        [Benchmark]
        public double[] ArrayFill() {
            var array = new double[ArrayLength];
            Array.Fill(array, double.PositiveInfinity);

            return array;
        }
    }

没有办法将数组中的所有元素设置为单个操作，除非，该值是元素类型的默认值。

例如，如果它是一个整数数组，你可以通过一个操作将它们全部设置为0，如下所示: Array.Clear(…)

在谷歌搜索和阅读之后，我发现了这个:

bool[] bPrimes = new bool[1000000];
bPrimes = Array.ConvertAll<bool, bool>(bPrimes, b=> b=true);

这肯定更接近我要找的东西。但我不确定这是否比在for循环中遍历原始数组并只更改值更好。事实上，经过快速测试后，它看起来慢了大约5倍。所以这不是一个好的解决方案!