如何在React.js中执行debounce ?

我想撤消handleOnChange。

我尝试debounce(这。handleOnChange, 200)但它不起作用。

function debounce(fn, delay) {
  var timer = null;
  return function() {
    var context = this,
      args = arguments;
    clearTimeout(timer);
    timer = setTimeout(function() {
      fn.apply(context, args);
    }, delay);
  };
}

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    return <input type="search" name="p" onChange={this.handleOnChange} />;
  },

  handleOnChange: function(event) {
    // make ajax call
  }
});

当前回答

使用React Hooks和响应式编程(RxJS)的React ajax debounce和cancel示例解决方案:

import React, { useEffect, useState } from "react";
import { ajax } from "rxjs/ajax";
import { debounceTime, delay, takeUntil } from "rxjs/operators";
import { Subject } from "rxjs/internal/Subject";

const App = () => {
  const [items, setItems] = useState([]);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
  const [filterChangedSubject] = useState(() => {
    // Arrow function is used to init Singleton Subject. (in a scope of a current component)
    return new Subject<string>();
  });

  useEffect(() => {
    // Effect that will be initialized once on a react component init.
    const subscription = filterChangedSubject
      .pipe(debounceTime(200))
      .subscribe((filter) => {
        if (!filter) {
          setLoading(false);
          setItems([]);
          return;
        }
        ajax(`https://swapi.dev/api/people?search=${filter}`)
          .pipe(
            // current running ajax is canceled on filter change.
            takeUntil(filterChangedSubject)
          )
          .subscribe(
            (results) => {
              // Set items will cause render:
              setItems(results.response.results);
            },
            () => {
              setLoading(false);
            },
            () => {
              setLoading(false);
            }
          );
      });

    return () => {
      // On Component destroy. notify takeUntil to unsubscribe from current running ajax request
      filterChangedSubject.next("");
      // unsubscribe filter change listener
      subscription.unsubscribe();
    };
  }, []);

  const onFilterChange = (e) => {
    // Notify subject about the filter change
    filterChangedSubject.next(e.target.value);
  };
  return (
    <div>
      Cards
      {loading && <div>Loading...</div>}
      <input onChange={onFilterChange}></input>
      {items && items.map((item, index) => <div key={index}>{item.name}</div>)}
    </div>
  );
};

export default App;

其他回答

有点晚了,但应该有帮助。 创建这个类(它是用typescript写的,但是很容易转换成javascript)

export class debouncedMethod<T>{
  constructor(method:T, debounceTime:number){
    this._method = method;
    this._debounceTime = debounceTime;
  }
  private _method:T;
  private _timeout:number;
  private _debounceTime:number;
  public invoke:T = ((...args:any[])=>{
    this._timeout && window.clearTimeout(this._timeout);
    this._timeout = window.setTimeout(()=>{
      (this._method as any)(...args);
    },this._debounceTime);
  }) as any;
}

要使用

var foo = new debouncedMethod((name,age)=>{
 console.log(name,age);
},500);
foo.invoke("john",31);

2019年:尝试钩子+承诺跳跃

这是我如何解决这个问题的最新版本。我会用:

awesome- debount -promise来debount async函数 使用-constant将该函数存储到组件中 React-async-hook来获取结果到组件中

这是一些最初的连接,但你是在自己组成原始块,你可以让你自己的自定义钩子,这样你只需要这样做一次。

// Generic reusable hook
const useDebouncedSearch = (searchFunction) => {

  // Handle the input text state
  const [inputText, setInputText] = useState('');

  // Debounce the original search async function
  const debouncedSearchFunction = useConstant(() =>
    AwesomeDebouncePromise(searchFunction, 300)
  );

  // The async callback is run each time the text changes,
  // but as the search function is debounced, it does not
  // fire a new request on each keystroke
  const searchResults = useAsync(
    async () => {
      if (inputText.length === 0) {
        return [];
      } else {
        return debouncedSearchFunction(inputText);
      }
    },
    [debouncedSearchFunction, inputText]
  );

  // Return everything needed for the hook consumer
  return {
    inputText,
    setInputText,
    searchResults,
  };
};

然后你可以用钩子:

const useSearchStarwarsHero = () => useDebouncedSearch(text => searchStarwarsHeroAsync(text))

const SearchStarwarsHeroExample = () => {
  const { inputText, setInputText, searchResults } = useSearchStarwarsHero();
  return (
    <div>
      <input value={inputText} onChange={e => setInputText(e.target.value)} />
      <div>
        {searchResults.loading && <div>...</div>}
        {searchResults.error && <div>Error: {search.error.message}</div>}
        {searchResults.result && (
          <div>
            <div>Results: {search.result.length}</div>
            <ul>
              {searchResults.result.map(hero => (
                <li key={hero.name}>{hero.name}</li>
              ))}
            </ul>
          </div>
        )}
      </div>
    </div>
  );
};

你会发现这个例子在这里运行,你应该阅读react-async-hook文档了解更多细节。


2018年:尝试打破承诺

我们经常希望取消API调用,以避免后端充斥着无用的请求。

在2018年,使用回调(Lodash/Underscore)对我来说感觉很糟糕,很容易出错。由于API调用以任意顺序解析,因此很容易遇到样板文件和并发问题。

我用React创建了一个小库来解决你的烦恼:awesome-debounc -promise。

这个不应该比这个更复杂:

const searchAPI = text => fetch('/search?text=' + encodeURIComponent(text));

const searchAPIDebounced = AwesomeDebouncePromise(searchAPI, 500);

class SearchInputAndResults extends React.Component {
  state = {
    text: '',
    results: null,
  };

  handleTextChange = async text => {
    this.setState({ text, results: null });
    const result = await searchAPIDebounced(text);
    this.setState({ result });
  };
}

debound函数确保:

API调用将被撤销 debented函数总是返回一个promise 只有最后一个电话的承诺才能解决问题 一个这个。setState({result});每个API调用会发生什么

最后,如果你的组件卸载了,你可以添加另一个技巧:

componentWillUnmount() {
  this.setState = () => {};
}

注意,Observables (RxJS)也非常适合用于分解输入,但它是一个更强大的抽象,可能更难正确学习/使用。


< 2017:还想用回调解调吗?

这里的重要部分是为每个组件实例创建单个debpublished(或throttled)函数。您不希望每次都重新创建debounce(或throttle)函数,也不希望多个实例共享同一个debounce函数。

我没有在这个答案中定义一个deboundation函数,因为它并不真正相关,但这个答案将与_.debounce的下划线或lodash以及任何用户提供的deboundation函数完美地工作。


好主意:

因为debound函数是有状态的,所以我们必须为每个组件实例创建一个debound函数。

ES6 (class属性):推荐

class SearchBox extends React.Component {
    method = debounce(() => { 
      ...
    });
}

ES6(类构造函数)

class SearchBox extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
        this.method = debounce(this.method.bind(this),1000);
    }
    method() { ... }
}

ES5

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
    method: function() {...},
    componentWillMount: function() {
       this.method = debounce(this.method.bind(this),100);
    },
});

请参阅JsFiddle: 3个实例每个实例产生1个日志条目(这在全局上是3个)。


这不是个好主意:

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
  method: function() {...},
  debouncedMethod: debounce(this.method, 100);
});

它不会工作,因为在类描述对象创建期间,这不是创建的对象本身。这一点。方法不会返回你期望的内容,因为这个上下文不是对象本身(它实际上还不存在,因为它刚刚被创建)。


这不是个好主意:

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
  method: function() {...},
  debouncedMethod: function() {
      var debounced = debounce(this.method,100);
      debounced();
  },
});

这一次,您有效地创建了一个调用This .method的debaded函数。问题是您在每次debouncedMethod调用时都要重新创建它,因此新创建的debounce函数不知道以前的调用!您必须在一段时间内重用相同的回调函数,否则将不会发生回调。


这不是个好主意:

var SearchBox = React.createClass({
  debouncedMethod: debounce(function () {...},100),
});

这有点棘手。

类的所有挂载实例都将共享相同的debked函数,这通常不是您想要的!请参阅JsFiddle: 3个实例全局只生成1个日志条目。

您必须为每个组件实例创建一个debked函数,而不是在类级别上创建一个由每个组件实例共享的debked函数。


负责React的事件池

这是相关的,因为我们经常想要反弹或抑制DOM事件。

在React中,你在回调中接收到的事件对象(即SyntheticEvent)是池化的(现在有文档了)。这意味着在事件回调被调用之后,您接收到的SyntheticEvent将被放回具有空属性的池中,以减少GC压力。

因此,如果您以异步方式访问SyntheticEvent属性到原始回调(如果您节流/debounce,可能会出现这种情况),您访问的属性可能会被擦除。如果希望事件永远不被放回池中,可以使用persist()方法。

不持久化(默认行为:合并事件)

onClick = e => {
  alert(`sync -> hasNativeEvent=${!!e.nativeEvent}`);
  setTimeout(() => {
    alert(`async -> hasNativeEvent=${!!e.nativeEvent}`);
  }, 0);
};

第二个(异步)将打印hasNativeEvent=false,因为事件属性已被清除。

与坚持

onClick = e => {
  e.persist();
  alert(`sync -> hasNativeEvent=${!!e.nativeEvent}`);
  setTimeout(() => {
    alert(`async -> hasNativeEvent=${!!e.nativeEvent}`);
  }, 0);
};

第二个(异步)将打印hasNativeEvent=true,因为持久化允许您避免将事件放回池中。

您可以在这里测试这两个行为:JsFiddle

请阅读Julen的回答,了解在throttle/debounce函数中使用persist()的示例。

/**
 * Returns a function with the same signature of input `callback` (but without an output) that if called, smartly
 * executes the `callback` in a debounced way.<br>
 * There is no `delay` (to execute the `callback`) in the self-delayed tries (try = calling debounced callback). It
 * will defer **only** subsequent tries (that are earlier than a minimum timeout (`delay` ms) after the latest
 * execution). It also **cancels stale tries** (that have been obsoleted because of creation of newer tries during the
 * same timeout).<br>
 * The timeout won't be expanded! So **the subsequent execution won't be deferred more than `delay`**, at all.
 * @param {Function} callback
 * @param {number} [delay=167] Defaults to `167` that is equal to "10 frames at 60 Hz" (`10 * (1000 / 60) ~= 167 ms`)
 * @return {Function}
 */
export function smartDebounce (callback, delay = 167) {
  let minNextExecTime = 0
  let timeoutId

  function debounced (...args) {
    const now = new Date().getTime()
    if (now > minNextExecTime) { // execute immediately
      minNextExecTime = now + delay // there would be at least `delay` ms between ...
      callback.apply(this, args) // ... two consecutive executions
      return
    }
    // schedule the execution:
    clearTimeout(timeoutId) // unset possible previous scheduling
    timeoutId = setTimeout( // set new scheduling
      () => {
        minNextExecTime = now + delay // there would be at least `delay` ms between ...
        callback.apply(this, args) // ... two consecutive executions
      },
      minNextExecTime - now, // 0 <= timeout <= `delay` ... (`minNextExecTime` <= `now` + `delay`)
    )
  }

  debounced.clear = clearTimeout.bind(null, timeoutId)

  return debounced
}
/**
 * Like React's `useCallback`, but will {@link smartDebounce smartly debounce} future executions.
 * @param {Function} callback
 * @param {[]} deps
 * @param {number} [delay=167] - Defaults to `167` that is equal to "10 frames at 60 Hz" (`10 * (1000 / 60) ~= 167 ms`)
 */
export const useDebounced = (callback, deps, delay = 167) =>
  useMemo(() => smartDebounce(callback, delay), [...deps, delay])

与其在debounce()中包装handleOnChange,不如在debounce()中包装回调函数中的ajax调用,从而不破坏事件对象。就像这样:

handleOnChange: function (event) {
   debounce(
     $.ajax({})
  , 250);
}

我们需要将setter传递给debpublished方法:

以下是StackBlitz的一个例子:

import React from "react";
import debounce from "lodash/debounce";

export default function App() {
  const [state, setState] = React.useState({
    debouncedLog: ""
  });

  const debouncedLog = React.useCallback(
    debounce((setState, log) => {
      setState(prevState => ({
        ...prevState,
        debouncedLog: log
      }));
    }, 500),
    []
  );

  const onChange = React.useCallback(({ target: { value: log } }) => {
    debouncedLog(setState, log); // passing the setState along...
  }, []);
  return (
    <div>
      <input onChange={onChange} style={{ outline: "1px blue solid" }} />

      <pre>Debounced Value: {state.debouncedLog}</pre>
    </div>
  );
}

祝你好运…