我有一个用Python编写的应用程序,它是由相当专业的观众(科学家)使用的。
我正在寻找一个好方法,使应用程序可扩展的用户,即脚本/插件架构。
I am looking for something extremely lightweight. Most scripts, or plugins, are not going to be developed and distributed by a third-party and installed, but are going to be something whipped up by a user in a few minutes to automate a repeating task, add support for a file format, etc. So plugins should have the absolute minimum boilerplate code, and require no 'installation' other than copying to a folder (so something like setuptools entry points, or the Zope plugin architecture seems like too much.)
是否已经有类似的系统存在,或者是否有项目实现了类似的方案,我应该看看想法/灵感?
实际上,setuptools工作在一个“插件目录”下,下面的例子摘自项目文档:
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PkgResources#locating-plugins
使用示例:
plugin_dirs = ['foo/plugins'] + sys.path
env = Environment(plugin_dirs)
distributions, errors = working_set.find_plugins(env)
map(working_set.add, distributions) # add plugins+libs to sys.path
print("Couldn't load plugins due to: %s" % errors)
从长远来看,setuptools是一个更安全的选择,因为它可以加载插件而不会发生冲突或丢失需求。
另一个好处是插件本身可以使用相同的机制进行扩展,而无需原始应用程序关心它。
当我搜索Python Decorators时,发现了一个简单但有用的代码片段。它可能不符合你的需求,但非常鼓舞人心。
Scipy高级Python#插件注册系统
class TextProcessor(object):
PLUGINS = []
def process(self, text, plugins=()):
if plugins is ():
for plugin in self.PLUGINS:
text = plugin().process(text)
else:
for plugin in plugins:
text = plugin().process(text)
return text
@classmethod
def plugin(cls, plugin):
cls.PLUGINS.append(plugin)
return plugin
@TextProcessor.plugin
class CleanMarkdownBolds(object):
def process(self, text):
return text.replace('**', '')
用法:
processor = TextProcessor()
processed = processor.process(text="**foo bar**", plugins=(CleanMarkdownBolds, ))
processed = processor.process(text="**foo bar**")