这个解决方案结合了一些以前的答案,并更好地符合建议的2020年8月标准解决方案,这个解决方案在2020年9月对我来说仍然可行,因为String.replaceAll不在我使用的Node.js二进制中。

RegExp.escape 是一个单独的问题处理,但它在这里很重要,因为官方提出的解决方案将自动逃脱基于链条的查找输入。

如果你需要准确的标准符合,对于一个应用程序,它是严格依赖于标准实施,那么我建议使用Babel或其他工具,你得到“正确的答案”每次而不是Stack Overflow。

代码:

if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(RegExp, 'escape')) {
  RegExp.escape = function(string) {
    // https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Regular_Expressions#Escaping
    // https://github.com/benjamingr/RegExp.escape/issues/37
    return string.replace(/[.*+\-?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&'); // $& means the whole matched string
  };
}

if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(String, 'replaceAll')) {
  String.prototype.replaceAll = function(find, replace) {
    // https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/replaceAll
    // If you pass a RegExp to 'find', you _MUST_ include 'g' as a flag.
    // TypeError: "replaceAll must be called with a global RegExp" not included, will silently cause significant errors. _MUST_ include 'g' as a flag for RegExp.
    // String parameters to 'find' do not require special handling.
    // Does not conform to "special replacement patterns" when "Specifying a string as a parameter" for replace
    // Does not conform to "Specifying a function as a parameter" for replace
    return this.replace(
          Object.prototype.toString.call(find) == '[object RegExp]' ?
            find :
            new RegExp(RegExp.escape(find), 'g'),
          replace
        );
  }
}

编码,小型:

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(RegExp,"escape")||(RegExp.escape=function(e){return e.replace(/[.*+\-?^${}()|[\]\\]/g,"\\$&")}),Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(String,"replaceAll")||(String.prototype.replaceAll=function(e,t){return this.replace("[object RegExp]"==Object.prototype.toString.call(e)?e:new RegExp(RegExp.escape(e),"g"),t)});

例子:

console.log(
  't*.STVAL'
    .replaceAll(
      new RegExp(RegExp.escape('T*.ST'), 'ig'),
      'TEST'
    )
);

console.log(
  't*.STVAL'
    .replaceAll(
      't*.ST',
      'TEST'
    );
);

没有 RegExp.Escape 的代码:

if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(String, 'replaceAll')) {
  String.prototype.replaceAll = function(find, replace) {
    // https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/replaceAll
    // If you pass a RegExp to 'find', you _MUST_ include 'g' as a flag.
    // TypeError: "replaceAll must be called with a global RegExp" not included, will silently cause significant errors. _MUST_ include 'g' as a flag for RegExp.
    // String parameters to 'find' do not require special handling.
    // Does not conform to "special replacement patterns" when "Specifying a string as a parameter" for replace
    // Does not conform to "Specifying a function as a parameter" for replace
    return this.replace(
          Object.prototype.toString.call(find) == '[object RegExp]' ?
            find :
            new RegExp(find.replace(/[.*+\-?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&'), 'g'),
          replace
        );
  }
}

代码没有 RegExp.Escape,小型:

Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(String,"replaceAll")||(String.prototype.replaceAll=function(e,t){return this.replace("[object RegExp]"==Object.prototype.toString.call(e)?e:new RegExp(e.replace(/[.*+\-?^${}()|[\]\\]/g,"\\$&"),"g"),t)});

这是最常见、最可读的方法。

var str = "Test abc test test abc test test test abc test test abc"

方法1:

str = str.replace(/abc/g, "replaced text");

方法2:

str = str.split("abc").join("replaced text");

方法3:

str = str.replace(new RegExp("abc", "g"), "replaced text");

方法4:

while(str.includes("abc")){
   str = str.replace("abc", "replaced text");
}

出口:

console.log(str);
// Test replaced text test test replaced text test test test replaced text test test replaced text

使用

str = str.replace(new RegExp("abc", 'g'), "");

因此,新的RegExp(“abc”,“g”)创造了一个常见的表达,符合所有事件(“g”旗帜)的文本(“abc”)。第二部分是什么被取代,在你的情况下,空线(“). str 是线,我们必须将它,作为替代(...)只是返回结果,但不超过。

下面是工作代码与原型:

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(find, replace) {
    var str = this;
    return str.replace(new RegExp(find.replace(/([.*+?^=!:${}()|\[\]\/\\])/g, "\\$1"), 'g'), replace);
};

function replaceAll(str, find, replace) {
    var $r="";
    while($r!=str){ 
        $r = str;
        str = str.replace(find, replace);
    }
    return str;
}

基于定期表达的实施

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(search, replacement) {
    var target = this;
    return target.replace(new RegExp(search, 'g'), replacement);
};

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(search, replacement) {
    var target = this;
    return target.split(search).join(replacement);
};

看看这个参数运行这两个实施对彼此。

正如 @ThomasLeduc 和其他人在下面的评论中所指出的那样,如果搜索包含某些字符,这些字符在常规表达式中被保留为特殊字符,则可能会出现常规表达式的实施问题。

MDN 还提供了一个实施,以逃避我们的线条. 如果它也被标准化为 RegExp.escape(str),但不幸的是,它不存在:

function escapeRegExp(str) {
  return str.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&"); // $& means the whole matched string
}