如果您使用NVARCHAR只是因为系统存储过程需要它，最常见的情况是莫名其妙的sp_executesql，并且您的动态SQL非常长，那么从性能角度来看，您最好在VARCHAR中进行所有字符串操作(连接、替换等)，然后将最终结果转换为NVARCHAR并将其输入到proc参数中。所以，不要总是使用NVARCHAR!

I can speak from experience on this, beware of nvarchar. Unless you absolutely require it this data field type destroys performance on larger database. I inherited a database that was hurting in terms of performance and space. We were able to reduce a 30GB database in size by 70%! There were some other modifications made to help with performance but I'm sure the varchar's helped out significantly with that as well. If your database has the potential for growing tables to a million + records stay away from nvarchar at all costs.

For your application, nvarchar is fine because the database size is small. Saying "always use nvarchar" is a vast oversimplification. If you're not required to store things like Kanji or other crazy characters, use VARCHAR, it'll use a lot less space. My predecessor at my current job designed something using NVARCHAR when it wasn't needed. We recently switched it to VARCHAR and saved 15 GB on just that table (it was highly written to). Furthermore, if you then have an index on that table and you want to include that column or make a composite index, you've just made your index file size larger.

做决定时要考虑周全;在SQL开发和数据定义中，似乎很少有“默认答案”(当然，除了不惜一切代价避免游标)。

Generally speaking; Start out with the most expensive datatype that has the least constraints. Put it in production. If performance starts to be an issue, find out what's actually being stored in those nvarchar columns. Is there any characters in there that wouldn't fit into varchar? If not, switch to varchar. Don't try to pre-optimize before you know where the pain is. My guess is that the choice between nvarchar/varchar is not what's going to slow down your application in the foreseable future. There will be other parts of the application where performance tuning will give you much more bang for the bucks.

总是使用nvarchar。

对于大多数应用程序，您可能永远都不需要双字节字符。但是，如果您需要支持双字节语言，而您的数据库模式中只有单字节支持，那么返回并在整个应用程序中进行修改是非常昂贵的。

将一个应用程序从varchar迁移到nvarchar的成本将远远超过在大多数应用程序中使用的一点点额外磁盘空间。

在过去的几年里，我们所有的项目都使用了NVARCHAR，因为所有这些项目都是多语言的。从外部源导入的数据(例如ASCII文件等)在插入到数据库之前被上转换为Unicode。

我还没有遇到任何与较大索引相关的性能问题，等等。索引确实会使用更多的内存，但是内存很便宜。

无论您是使用存储过程还是动态构造SQL，都要确保所有字符串常量都有N前缀(例如SET @foo = N' hello world.';)，这样常量也是Unicode。这避免了在运行时进行任何字符串类型转换。

YMMV。