我并不完全相信ide的使用。然而，我认为像Eclipse这样的优秀IDE最有价值的方面是良好集成的cscope风格的功能，能够快速理解大型代码库。

例如，在Eclipse中，您看到一个方法接受类型为FooBar的参数，但您不知道它的含义。与其浪费一分钟艰难地寻找定义(并冒着一路上各种分心的风险)，只需选择FooBar，按F3，它就会打开相关的源文件，直到FooBar被定义的那一行。

在我看来，ide的缺点是它们给了您一个更大的学习曲线，除非您想使用绝对默认的配置。(Emacs也是如此。)

节省开发时间 通过提供集成调试、智能感知等功能，使生活更轻松。

有很多，但我会建议使用一个，他们比明显。

这取决于你使用的语言，但在c#和Java中，我发现ide对以下方面有好处:

Quickly navigating to a type without needing to worry about namespace, project etc Navigating to members by treating them as hyperlinks Autocompletion when you can't remember the names of all members by heart Automatic code generation Refactoring (massive one) Organise imports (automatically adding appropriate imports in Java, using directives in C#) Warning-as-you-type (i.e. some errors don't even require a compile cycle) Hovering over something to see the docs Keeping a view of files, errors/warnings/console/unit tests etc and source code all on the screen at the same time in a useful way Ease of running unit tests from the same window Integrated debugging Integrated source control Navigating to where a compile-time error or run-time exception occurred directly from the error details. Etc!

所有这些都节省时间。这些事情我可以手动完成，但会更痛苦:我宁愿编写代码。

For me, an IDE is better because it allows faster navigation in code which is important if you have something in your mind to implement. Supposed you do not use an IDE, it takes longer to get to the destination. Your thoughts may be interupted more often. It means more clicks/more keys have to be pressed. One has to concentrate more on the thought how to implement things. Of course, you can write down things too but then one must jump between the design and implementation. Also, a GUI designer makes a big difference. If you do that by hand, it may take longer.

我从相反的方向来回答这个问题。我从小就在Makefile+Emacs的环境中编程。从我最早的DOS编译器，微软的Quick C，我有一个IDE自动化的事情。我在Visual c++ 6.0上工作了很多年，当我毕业到Enterprise Java时，我使用Borland JBuilder，然后决定使用Eclipse，这对我来说已经变得非常高效。

Throughout my initial self-teaching, college, and now professional career, I have come to learn that any major software development done solely within the IDE becomes counterproductive. I say this because most IDE's wants you to work in their peculiar I-control-how-the-world-works style. You have to slice and dice your projects along their lines. You have manage your project builds using their odd dialog boxes. Most IDE's manage complex build dependencies between projects poorly, and dependencies can be difficult to get working 100%. I have been in situations where IDE's would not produce a working build of my code unless I did a Clean/Rebuild All. Finally, there's rarely a clean way to move your software out of development and into other environments like QA or Production from an IDE. It's usually a clicky fest to get all your deployment units built, or you've got some awkward tool that the IDE vendor gives you to bundle stuff up. But again, that tool usually demands that your project and build structure absolutely conforms to their rules - and sometimes that just won't work for your projects' requirements.

我了解到，要与团队一起进行大规模开发，如果我们使用IDE开发代码，并使用手动编写的命令行脚本进行所有构建，那么我们可以获得最高的效率。(我们喜欢用Apache Ant进行Java开发。)我们发现在IDE中运行我们的脚本对于复杂的构建来说只是一个点击或者自动化的噩梦，用alt+tab到一个shell并在那里运行脚本要容易得多(而且破坏性更小)。

Manual builds requires us to miss out on some of the niceties in the modern IDE like background compilation, but what we gain is much more critical: clean and easy builds that can live in multiple environments. The "one click build" all those agile guys talk about? We have it. Our build scripts can be directly invoked by continuous integration systems as well. Having builds managed through continuous integration allows us to more formally stage and migrate your code deployments to different environments, and lets us know almost immediately when someone checks in bad code that breaks the build or unit tests.

In truth, my taking the role of build away from the IDE hasn't hurt us too badly. The intellisense and refactoring tools in Eclipse are still completely useful and valid - the background compilation simply serves to support those tools. And, Eclipse's peculiar slicing of projects has served as a very nice way to mentally break down our problem sets in a way everyone can understand (still a tad bit verbose for my tastes though). I think one of the most important things about Eclipse is the excellent SCM integrations, that's what makes team development so enjoyable. We use Subversion+Eclipse, and that has been very productive and very easy to train our people to become experts at.

不要认为这是排他性的。使用IDE来获得它所提供的好处，当需要集中精力时切换到vim/首选的文本编辑器。

我发现IDE更适合重构、浏览、调试以及找出要做的事情。然后在IDE中完成小的事情，大的事情我切换到vim来完成。