在另一个问题中，Mark高度评价了ide，说“有些人仍然不知道”为什么“他们应该使用一个……”。作为一个使用vim进行编程的人，并且在大多数/所有同事都使用vim或emacs进行所有工作的环境中工作的人，ide的优势是什么?我为什么要用它?
我相信这对一些人来说是一个棘手的问题，我对开始一场论战不感兴趣，所以请只回复你认为基于ide的方法更好的原因。我对听到为什么我不应该使用IDE不感兴趣;我已经不用了。可以这么说，我感兴趣的是听取“栅栏的另一边”的意见。
如果您认为ide可能适合某些类型的工作，但不适合其他类型的工作，我也很想知道为什么。
当前回答
除了其他答案之外，我喜欢使用类似于Eclipse的ViPlugin之类的东西，将IDE的开发能力与Vim的编辑能力结合起来。
其他回答
I'm not sure there's a clear dividing line between a text editor and an IDE. You have the likes of Notepad at one end of the scale, and the best modern IDEs at the other, but there are a lot of thing in between. Most text editors have syntax highlighting; editors aimed at programmers often have various other features such as easy code navigation and auto complete. Emacs even lets you integrate a debugger. The IDEs of even ten years ago had far less features to help programmers than you'd expect of a serious text editor these days.
这在很大程度上取决于你在做什么，以及你用什么语言来做。就我个人而言,我倾向于不使用IDE(或“我的IDE包含3 xterm vim运行,运行数据库客户端,和一个bash提示或尾矿日志”,这取决于你广泛的定义IDE)的大部分时间里我的工作,但是,如果我发现自己开发一个platform-native GUI,然后我会找一个瞬间看清IDE——国际海事组织、IDE和图形形式编辑显然是天生的一对。
Eclipse:
代码高亮显示，在后台编译，在执行过程中指出错误。
与javadoc集成，使用ctrl-Space提示变量名。
当我编译时，就会得到错误。我可以双击一个错误，它会显示相应的行。
很好地与JUnit集成，ctrl-F11运行测试，告诉我测试失败了。如果在输出窗口中出现异常，我可以双击某行，并将我带到失败的行。不仅如此，ctrl-F11还可以确保在运行测试之前编译所有内容(这意味着我永远不会忘记这样做)。
与ant集成。一个命令用于构建和部署应用程序。
集成调试器，包括web服务器的远程调试。
神奇的重构工具，搜索一段代码的引用。帮助我了解改变的影响。
总而言之，这让我更有效率。
For me, an IDE is better because it allows faster navigation in code which is important if you have something in your mind to implement. Supposed you do not use an IDE, it takes longer to get to the destination. Your thoughts may be interupted more often. It means more clicks/more keys have to be pressed. One has to concentrate more on the thought how to implement things. Of course, you can write down things too but then one must jump between the design and implementation. Also, a GUI designer makes a big difference. If you do that by hand, it may take longer.
It's really VERY simple. But this answer is a bit of a paradox in that I am discussing something only EMBEDDED level developers ever encounter. The reason this is an odd view is that frankly when I was doing embedded work (the brief time I was making any real money) an IDE would be down right STRANGE and most of your coworkers would wonder why you can't remember enough about SNMP/ASN.1 or whatever protocol you were dealing with to just /do your job/. BUT you can NOT, as far as I know, do a graphical simulation of what your microcontroller is doing in something like /real time/ without an "IDE".
