不要忘记，为类生成的Javadoc将包括一个已知子类列表(对于接口，包括已知实现类)。

几年前我就这样做了。最可靠的方法(即使用官方Java api，没有外部依赖)是编写一个自定义doclet来生成一个可以在运行时读取的列表。

你可以像这样从命令行运行它:

javadoc -d build -doclet com.example.ObjectListDoclet -sourcepath java/src -subpackages com.example

或者像这样从ant运行它:

<javadoc sourcepath="${src}" packagenames="*" >
  <doclet name="com.example.ObjectListDoclet" path="${build}"/>
</javadoc>

下面是基本代码:

public final class ObjectListDoclet {
    public static final String TOP_CLASS_NAME =  "com.example.MyClass";        

    /** Doclet entry point. */
    public static boolean start(RootDoc root) throws Exception {
        try {
            ClassDoc topClassDoc = root.classNamed(TOP_CLASS_NAME);
            for (ClassDoc classDoc : root.classes()) {
                if (classDoc.subclassOf(topClassDoc)) {
                    System.out.println(classDoc);
                }
            }
            return true;
        }
        catch (Exception ex) {
            ex.printStackTrace();
            return false;
        }
    }
}

为了简单起见，我删除了命令行参数解析，并将其写入System。Out而不是file。

Try ClassGraph. (Disclaimer, I am the author). ClassGraph supports scanning for subclasses of a given class, either at runtime or at build time, but also much more. ClassGraph can build an abstract representation of the entire class graph (all classes, annotations, methods, method parameters, and fields) in memory, for all classes on the classpath, or for classes in selected packages, and you can query this class graph however you want. ClassGraph supports more classpath specification mechanisms and classloaders than any other scanner, and also works seamlessly with the new JPMS module system, so if you base your code on ClassGraph, your code will be maximally portable. See the API here.

在java中输入链接描述hereService Manager将获得J中接口的所有实现类

还要注意的是，这当然只能找到当前类路径中存在的所有子类。想必这对于你目前所看到的是可以的，而且你也有可能考虑过这一点，但如果你在任何时候发布了一个非最终类(对于不同程度的“狂野”)，那么其他人已经编写了他们自己的子类，而你不知道这是完全可行的。

Thus if you happened to be wanting to see all subclasses because you want to make a change and are going to see how it affects subclasses' behaviour - then bear in mind the subclasses that you can't see. Ideally all of your non-private methods, and the class itself should be well-documented; make changes according to this documentation without changing the semantics of methods/non-private fields and your changes should be backwards-compatible, for any subclass that followed your definition of the superclass at least.

我需要将此作为一个测试用例，以查看是否向代码中添加了新的类。这就是我所做的

final static File rootFolder = new File(SuperClass.class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation().getPath());
private static ArrayList<String> files = new ArrayList<String>();
listFilesForFolder(rootFolder); 

@Test(timeout = 1000)
public void testNumberOfSubclasses(){
    ArrayList<String> listSubclasses = new ArrayList<>(files);
    listSubclasses.removeIf(s -> !s.contains("Superclass.class"));
    for(String subclass : listSubclasses){
        System.out.println(subclass);
    }
    assertTrue("You did not create a new subclass!", listSubclasses.size() >1);     
}

public static void listFilesForFolder(final File folder) {
    for (final File fileEntry : folder.listFiles()) {
        if (fileEntry.isDirectory()) {
            listFilesForFolder(fileEntry);
        } else {
            files.add(fileEntry.getName().toString());
        }
    }
}