我正在尝试使用EF6更新记录。首先找到记录,如果它存在,则更新。 这是我的代码:

var book = new Model.Book
{
    BookNumber =  _book.BookNumber,
    BookName = _book.BookName,
    BookTitle = _book.BookTitle,
};
using (var db = new MyContextDB())
{
    var result = db.Books.SingleOrDefault(b => b.BookNumber == bookNumber);
    if (result != null)
    {
        try
        {
            db.Books.Attach(book);
            db.Entry(book).State = EntityState.Modified;
            db.SaveChanges();
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            throw;
        }
    }
}

每次我尝试使用上面的代码更新记录时,我都会得到这个错误:

{System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure。DbUpdateConcurrencyException:存储 更新、插入或删除语句受影响的数量超出预期 自实体以来,实体可能已被修改或删除 被加载。刷新ObjectStateManager条目


当前回答

附加实体会将其跟踪状态设置为Unchanged。要更新现有实体,您所需要做的就是将跟踪状态设置为Modified。根据EF6文档:

如果您知道数据库中已经存在一个实体,但可能已经对其进行了更改,那么您可以告诉上下文附加该实体,并将其状态设置为Modified。例如: var existingBlog =新Blog {BlogId = 1, Name = "ADO. log "。NET Blog"}; 使用(var context = new BloggingContext()) { context.Entry (existingBlog)。State = EntityState.Modified; //多做点工作… context.SaveChanges (); }

其他回答

如Renat所说,删除:db.Books.Attach(book);

另外,将结果查询改为使用“AsNoTracking”,因为该查询会抛出实体框架的模型状态。它认为“结果”是现在要追踪的书,而你不想要那个。

var result = db.Books.AsNoTracking().SingleOrDefault(b => b.BookNumber == bookNumber);

这是实体框架6.2.0。

如果你有一个特定的DbSet和一个需要更新或创建的项:

var name = getNameFromService();

var current = _dbContext.Names.Find(name.BusinessSystemId, name.NameNo);
if (current == null)
{
    _dbContext.Names.Add(name);
}
else
{
    _dbContext.Entry(current).CurrentValues.SetValues(name);
}
_dbContext.SaveChanges();

但是,这也可以用于具有单个主键或复合主键的通用DbSet。

var allNames = NameApiService.GetAllNames();
GenericAddOrUpdate(allNames, "BusinessSystemId", "NameNo");

public virtual void GenericAddOrUpdate<T>(IEnumerable<T> values, params string[] keyValues) where T : class
{
    foreach (var value in values)
    {
        try
        {
            var keyList = new List<object>();

            //Get key values from T entity based on keyValues property
            foreach (var keyValue in keyValues)
            {
                var propertyInfo = value.GetType().GetProperty(keyValue);
                var propertyValue = propertyInfo.GetValue(value);
                keyList.Add(propertyValue);
            }

            GenericAddOrUpdateDbSet(keyList, value);
            //Only use this when debugging to catch save exceptions
            //_dbContext.SaveChanges();
        }
        catch
        {
            throw;
        }
    }
    _dbContext.SaveChanges();
}

public virtual void GenericAddOrUpdateDbSet<T>(List<object> keyList, T value) where T : class
{
    //Get a DbSet of T type
    var someDbSet = Set(typeof(T));

    //Check if any value exists with the key values
    var current = someDbSet.Find(keyList.ToArray());
    if (current == null)
    {
        someDbSet.Add(value);
    }
    else
    {
        Entry(current).CurrentValues.SetValues(value);
    }
}

附加实体会将其跟踪状态设置为Unchanged。要更新现有实体,您所需要做的就是将跟踪状态设置为Modified。根据EF6文档:

如果您知道数据库中已经存在一个实体,但可能已经对其进行了更改,那么您可以告诉上下文附加该实体,并将其状态设置为Modified。例如: var existingBlog =新Blog {BlogId = 1, Name = "ADO. log "。NET Blog"}; 使用(var context = new BloggingContext()) { context.Entry (existingBlog)。State = EntityState.Modified; //多做点工作… context.SaveChanges (); }

Not related to this specific example, but I came across a challenge when trying to use EF and a DateTime field as the concurrency check field. It appears the EF concurrency code doesn't honor the precision setting from the metadata (edmx) i.e. Type="DateTime" Precision="3". The database datetime field will store a millisecond component within the field (i.e. 2020-10-18 15:49:02.123). Even if you set the original value of the Entity to a DateTime that includes the millisecond component, the SQL EF generates is this:

UPDATE [dbo].[People]
SET [dateUpdated] = @0
WHERE (([PeopleID] = @1) AND ([dateUpdated] = @2))
-- @0: '10/19/2020 1:07:00 AM' (Type = DateTime2)
-- @1: '3182' (Type = Int32)
-- @2: '10/19/2020 1:06:10 AM' (Type = DateTime2)

正如您所看到的,@2是一个没有毫秒组件的STRING表示。这将导致更新失败。

因此,如果您打算使用DateTime字段作为并发键,那么在检索记录时必须从数据库字段中剥离毫秒/ tick,并且仅使用类似剥离的DateTime传递/更新字段。

    //strip milliseconds due to EF concurrency handling
    PeopleModel p = db.people.Where(x => x.PeopleID = id);
    if (p.dateUpdated.Millisecond > 0)
    {
        DateTime d = new DateTime(p.dateUpdated.Ticks / 10000000 * 10000000);
        object[] b = {p.PeopleID, d};
        int upd = db.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand("Update People set dateUpdated=@p1 where peopleId=@p0", b);
        if (upd == 1)
            p.dateUpdated = d;
        else
            return InternalServerError(new Exception("Unable to update dateUpdated"));
    }
return Ok(p);

当用新值更新字段时,也去掉毫秒

(param)int id, PeopleModel person;
People tbl = db.People.Where(x => x.PeopleID == id).FirstOrDefault();
db.Entry(tbl).OriginalValues["dateUpdated"] = person.dateUpdated;
//strip milliseconds from dateUpdated since EF doesn't preserve them
tbl.dateUpdated = new DateTime(DateTime.Now.Ticks / 10000000 * 10000000);

对于。net core

context.Customer.Add(customer);
context.Entry(customer).State = Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.EntityState.Modified;
context.SaveChanges();