请看这个链接，下面是引用自那里的:

A BufferedReader is a simple class meant to efficiently read from the underling stream. Generally, each read request made of a Reader like a FileReader causes a corresponding read request to be made to underlying stream. Each invocation of read() or readLine() could cause bytes to be read from the file, converted into characters, and then returned, which can be very inefficient. Efficiency is improved appreciably if a Reader is warped in a BufferedReader. BufferedReader is synchronized, so read operations on a BufferedReader can safely be done from multiple threads. A scanner on the other hand has a lot more cheese built into it; it can do all that a BufferedReader can do and at the same level of efficiency as well. However, in addition a Scanner can parse the underlying stream for primitive types and strings using regular expressions. It can also tokenize the underlying stream with the delimiter of your choice. It can also do forward scanning of the underlying stream disregarding the delimiter! A scanner however is not thread safe, it has to be externally synchronized. The choice of using a BufferedReader or a Scanner depends on the code you are writing, if you are writing a simple log reader Buffered reader is adequate. However if you are writing an XML parser Scanner is the more natural choice. Even while reading the input, if want to accept user input line by line and say just add it to a file, a BufferedReader is good enough. On the other hand if you want to accept user input as a command with multiple options, and then intend to perform different operations based on the command and options specified, a Scanner will suit better.

Scanner用于解析来自流内容的令牌，而BufferedReader只读取流，不做任何特殊的解析。

事实上，您可以将BufferedReader传递给扫描器作为要解析的字符源。

BufferedReader和Scanner的区别如下:

BufferedReader已同步，但Scanner未同步。 BufferedReader是线程安全的，但Scanner不是。 BufferedReader有更大的缓冲内存，而Scanner有更小的缓冲内存。 BufferedReader执行速度更快，但Scanner执行速度较慢。 从控制台读取一行的代码:

BufferedReader:

InputStreamReader isr = new InputStreamReader(System.in);
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(isr);
String st = br.readLine();
       
// You can make the object InputStreamReader object inside the BufferReader method.
BufferReader br = new BufferedReader(InputStreamReader(System.in));
String st = br.readLine();

// You can even inspect the type of the input stream manually by using Parse method which accepts string parameter.
int x = Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());

// Or you can pass the object directly.
int x = Integer.parseInt(st);

扫描仪:

Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
String st = sc.nextLine();

在当前最新的JDK 18发布/构建(b37)中，与BufferedReader(8192个字符)相比，Scanner的缓冲区更小(1024个字符)，但这已经足够了。

至于选择，如果你想解析文件，使用Scanner，如果你想逐行读取文件，使用BufferedReader。也请参阅前面链接的API文档的介绍文本。

解析=将给定的输入解释为标记(部分)。它可以直接返回特定的部分，如int，字符串，小数等。请参见Scanner类中的所有nextXxx()方法。 阅读=无声流媒体。它不断返回给你所有的字符，你反过来必须手动检查，如果你想匹配或组合一些有用的东西。但如果你不需要这样做，那么阅读就足够了。

我更喜欢Scanner，因为它不会抛出检查异常，因此它的使用结果在一个更精简的代码。

BufferedReader和Scanner之间的区别是:

BufferedReader reads data, but Scanner parses data. You can only read String using BufferedReader, using Scanner you can read to different data types like int. BufferedReader is older than Scanner, it was added on JDK 1.1, while Scanner was added on JDK 5 release. The buffer size of BufferedReader is larger (8KB) as compared to Scanner's 1KB. BufferedReader is more suitable for reading files with long String, while Scanner is more suitable for reading small user input from command prompt. BufferedReader is synchronized, while Scanner is not, which means you cannot share Scanner among multiple threads. BufferedReader is faster than Scanner because it doesn't spend time on parsing. BufferedReader is a bit faster as compared to Scanner. BufferedReader is from java.io package, while Scanner is from java.util package.

在此基础上，我们可以选择我们的选择。

感谢阅读!