对于不可变对象，创建一个副本没有多大意义，因为它们不会改变。对于可变对象赋值，copy和deepcopy的行为不同。让我们用例子来讨论每一个。

赋值操作只是将源的引用赋值给目标，例如:

>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j=i
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x10296f908') #Both addresses are identical

现在i和j技术上指向同一个列表。i和j都有相同的内存地址。任何更新 其中一个会被另一个反射。例句:

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,4] #Destination is updated

>>> j.append(5)
>>> i
>>> [1,2,3,4,5] #Source is updated

另一方面，copy和deepcopy会创建一个新的变量副本。所以现在对原始变量的更改将不会被反映 复制变量，反之亦然。但是复制(浅复制)，不创建嵌套对象的副本，而只是 复制嵌套对象的引用。Deepcopy递归复制所有嵌套对象。

一些演示copy和deepcopy行为的例子:

使用copy的平面列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j = copy.copy(i)
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are different

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3] #Updation of original list didn't affected copied variable

使用copy的嵌套列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3,[4,5]]
>>> j = copy.copy(i)

>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are still different

>>> hex(id(i[3])), hex(id(j[3]))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x10296f908') #Nested lists have same address

>>> i[3].append(6)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,[4,5,6]] #Updation of original nested list updated the copy as well

使用deepcopy的平面列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j = copy.deepcopy(i)
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are different

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3] #Updation of original list didn't affected copied variable

使用deepcopy的嵌套列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3,[4,5]]
>>> j = copy.deepcopy(i)

>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are still different

>>> hex(id(i[3])), hex(id(j[3]))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x102b9b7c8') #Nested lists have different addresses

>>> i[3].append(6)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,[4,5]] #Updation of original nested list didn't affected the copied variable    

在python中，当我们将list、tuples、dict等对象赋值给另一个对象时，通常使用' = '符号，python通过引用创建copy ' s。也就是说，我们有一个这样的列表:

list1 = [ [ 'a' , 'b' , 'c' ] , [ 'd' , 'e' , 'f' ]  ]

然后我们给这个列表分配另一个列表，像这样:

list2 = list1

然后，如果我们在python终端中输出list2，我们将得到:

list2 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f ']  ]

list1和list2都指向相同的内存位置，对其中任何一个的任何改变都会导致在两个对象中可见的变化，即两个对象都指向相同的内存位置。 如果我们像这样改变list1:

list1[0][0] = 'x’
list1.append( [ 'g'] )

那么list1和list2都将是:

list1 = [ [ 'x', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g'] ]
list2 = [ [ 'x', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g’ ] ]

现在来看浅复制，当两个对象通过浅复制进行复制时，两个父对象的子对象引用相同的内存位置，但任何被复制对象的任何进一步的新更改都将彼此独立。 让我们通过一个小例子来理解这一点。假设我们有这样一小段代码:

import copy

list1 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f ']  ]      # assigning a list
list2 = copy.copy(list1)       # shallow copy is done using copy function of copy module

list1.append ( [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] )   # appending another list to list1

print list1
list1 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] ]
list2 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] ]

注意，list2不受影响，但如果我们对子对象进行如下更改:

list1[0][0] = 'x’

那么list1和list2都将得到变化:

list1 = [ [ 'x', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] ] 
list2 = [ [ 'x', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] ]

现在，深度复制有助于创建彼此完全隔离的对象。如果两个对象通过深度复制进行复制，那么父对象和子对象都将指向不同的内存位置。 例子:

import copy

list1 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f ']  ]         # assigning a list
list2 = deepcopy.copy(list1)       # deep copy is done using deepcopy function of copy module

list1.append ( [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] )   # appending another list to list1

print list1
list1 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] ]
list2 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] ]

注意，list2不受影响，但如果我们对子对象进行如下更改:

list1[0][0] = 'x’

list2也不会受到影响，因为所有子对象和父对象都指向不同的内存位置:

list1 = [ [ 'x', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f '] , [ 'g', 'h', 'i'] ] 
list2 = [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c'] , [ 'd', 'e', ' f  ' ] ]

希望能有所帮助。

The GIST to take is this: Dealing with shallow lists (no sub_lists, just single elements) using "normal assignment" rises a "side effect" when you create a shallow list and then you create a copy of this list using "normal assignment". This "side effect" is when you change any element of the copy list created, because it will automatically change the same elements of the original list. That is when copy comes in handy, as it won't change the original list elements when changing the copy elements.

On the other hand, copy does have a "side effect" as well, when you have a list that has lists in it (sub_lists), and deepcopy solves it. For instance if you create a big list that has nested lists in it (sub_lists), and you create a copy of this big list (the original list). The "side effect" would arise when you modify the sub_lists of the copy list which would automatically modify the sub_lists of the big list. Sometimes (in some projects) you want to keep the big list (your original list) as it is without modification, and all you want is to make a copy of its elements (sub_lists). For that, your solution is to use deepcopy which will take care of this "side effect" and makes a copy without modifying the original content.

复制和深度复制操作的不同行为只涉及复合对象(即:包含其他对象(如列表)的对象)。

下面是这个简单的代码示例中说明的差异:

第一个

让我们通过创建一个原始列表和这个列表的副本来检查copy (shallow)的行为:

import copy
original_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b']]
copy_list = copy.copy(original_list)

现在，让我们运行一些打印测试，看看原始列表与它的复制列表相比表现如何:

Original_list和copy_list的地址不同

print(hex(id(original_list)), hex(id(copy_list))) # 0x1fb3030 0x1fb3328

original_list和copy_list中的元素有相同的地址

print(hex(id(original_list[1])), hex(id(copy_list[1]))) # 0x537ed440 0x537ed440

original_list和copy_list的Sub_elements有相同的地址

print(hex(id(original_list[5])), hex(id(copy_list[5]))) # 0x1faef08 0x1faef08

修改original_list元素不会修改copy_list元素

original_list.append(6)
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b']]

修改copy_list元素不会修改original_list元素

copy_list.append(7)
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 7]

修改original_list sub_elements会自动修改copy_list sub_elements

original_list[5].append('c')
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c'], 7]

修改copy_list sub_elements会自动修改original_list sub_elements

copy_list[5].append('d')
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 7]

第二个

让我们来检查deepcopy的行为，通过做和copy相同的事情(创建一个原始列表和这个列表的副本):

import copy
original_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b']]
copy_list = copy.copy(original_list)

现在，让我们运行一些打印测试，看看原始列表与它的复制列表相比表现如何:

import copy
original_list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b']]
copy_list = copy.deepcopy(original_list)

Original_list和copy_list的地址不同

print(hex(id(original_list)), hex(id(copy_list))) # 0x1fb3030 0x1fb3328

original_list和copy_list中的元素有相同的地址

print(hex(id(original_list[1])), hex(id(copy_list[1]))) # 0x537ed440 0x537ed440

original_list和copy_list的Sub_elements有不同的地址

print(hex(id(original_list[5])), hex(id(copy_list[5]))) # 0x24eef08 0x24f3300

修改original_list元素不会修改copy_list元素

original_list.append(6)
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b']]

修改copy_list元素不会修改original_list元素

copy_list.append(7)
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 7]

修改original_list sub_elements不会修改copy_list sub_elements

original_list[5].append('c')
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b'], 7]

修改copy_list sub_elements不会修改original_list sub_elements

copy_list[5].append('d')
print("original_list is:", original_list) # original_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 6]
print("copy_list is:", copy_list) # copy_list is: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ['a', 'b', 'd'], 7]

让我们在一个图形示例中看看下面的代码是如何执行的:

import copy

class Foo(object):
    def __init__(self):
        pass


a = [Foo(), Foo()]
shallow = copy.copy(a)
deep = copy.deepcopy(a)

A, b, c, d, a1, b1, c1和d1是对内存中对象的引用，它们由它们的id唯一标识。

An assignment operation takes a reference to the object in memory and assigns that reference to a new name. c=[1,2,3,4] is an assignment that creates a new list object containing those four integers, and assigns the reference to that object to c. c1=c is an assignment that takes the same reference to the same object and assigns that to c1. Since the list is mutable, anything that happens to that list will be visible regardless of whether you access it through c or c1, because they both reference the same object.

C1 =copy.copy(c)是一个“浅拷贝”，它创建一个新列表，并将对新列表的引用赋值给C1。C仍然指向原始的列表。所以，如果你在c1处修改列表，c所指向的列表不会改变。

复制的概念与整数和字符串等不可变对象无关。由于不能修改这些对象，因此不需要在内存的不同位置有相同值的两个副本。因此，整数和字符串，以及其他一些复制概念不适用的对象，只是简单地重新赋值。这就是为什么使用a和b的例子会得到相同的id。

c1=copy.deepcopy(c) is a "deep copy", but it functions the same as a shallow copy in this example. Deep copies differ from shallow copies in that shallow copies will make a new copy of the object itself, but any references inside that object will not themselves be copied. In your example, your list has only integers inside it (which are immutable), and as previously discussed there is no need to copy those. So the "deep" part of the deep copy does not apply. However, consider this more complex list:

E = [[1,2]，[4,5,6]，[7,8,9]]]

这是一个包含其他列表的列表(也可以将其描述为一个二维数组)。

If you run a "shallow copy" on e, copying it to e1, you will find that the id of the list changes, but each copy of the list contains references to the same three lists -- the lists with integers inside. That means that if you were to do e[0].append(3), then e would be [[1, 2, 3],[4, 5, 6],[7, 8, 9]]. But e1 would also be [[1, 2, 3],[4, 5, 6],[7, 8, 9]]. On the other hand, if you subsequently did e.append([10, 11, 12]), e would be [[1, 2, 3],[4, 5, 6],[7, 8, 9],[10, 11, 12]]. But e1 would still be [[1, 2, 3],[4, 5, 6],[7, 8, 9]]. That's because the outer lists are separate objects that initially each contain three references to three inner lists. If you modify the inner lists, you can see those changes no matter if you are viewing them through one copy or the other. But if you modify one of the outer lists as above, then e contains three references to the original three lists plus one more reference to a new list. And e1 still only contains the original three references.

“深度复制”不仅会复制外部列表，而且还会进入列表内部并复制内部列表，因此两个结果对象不包含任何相同的引用(就可变对象而言)。如果内部列表中有更多的列表(或其他对象，如字典)，它们也会被复制。这是“深层复制”的“深层”部分。

对于不可变对象，创建一个副本没有多大意义，因为它们不会改变。对于可变对象赋值，copy和deepcopy的行为不同。让我们用例子来讨论每一个。

赋值操作只是将源的引用赋值给目标，例如:

>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j=i
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x10296f908') #Both addresses are identical

现在i和j技术上指向同一个列表。i和j都有相同的内存地址。任何更新 其中一个会被另一个反射。例句:

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,4] #Destination is updated

>>> j.append(5)
>>> i
>>> [1,2,3,4,5] #Source is updated

另一方面，copy和deepcopy会创建一个新的变量副本。所以现在对原始变量的更改将不会被反映 复制变量，反之亦然。但是复制(浅复制)，不创建嵌套对象的副本，而只是 复制嵌套对象的引用。Deepcopy递归复制所有嵌套对象。

一些演示copy和deepcopy行为的例子:

使用copy的平面列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j = copy.copy(i)
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are different

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3] #Updation of original list didn't affected copied variable

使用copy的嵌套列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3,[4,5]]
>>> j = copy.copy(i)

>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are still different

>>> hex(id(i[3])), hex(id(j[3]))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x10296f908') #Nested lists have same address

>>> i[3].append(6)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,[4,5,6]] #Updation of original nested list updated the copy as well

使用deepcopy的平面列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3]
>>> j = copy.deepcopy(i)
>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are different

>>> i.append(4)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3] #Updation of original list didn't affected copied variable

使用deepcopy的嵌套列表示例:

>>> import copy
>>> i = [1,2,3,[4,5]]
>>> j = copy.deepcopy(i)

>>> hex(id(i)), hex(id(j))
>>> ('0x102b9b7c8', '0x102971cc8') #Both addresses are still different

>>> hex(id(i[3])), hex(id(j[3]))
>>> ('0x10296f908', '0x102b9b7c8') #Nested lists have different addresses

>>> i[3].append(6)
>>> j
>>> [1,2,3,[4,5]] #Updation of original nested list didn't affected the copied variable