在EF6

modelBuilder.Properties()
    .Where(x => x.GetCustomAttributes(false).OfType<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>().Any())
    .Configure(c => {
        var attr = (DecimalPrecisionAttribute)c.ClrPropertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (DecimalPrecisionAttribute), true).FirstOrDefault();

        c.HasPrecision(attr.Precision, attr.Scale);
    });

显然，你可以重写DbContext.OnModelCreating()方法，并像这样配置精度:

protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price).Precision = 10;
    modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price).Scale = 2;
}

但当你必须处理所有与价格相关的属性时，这是相当乏味的代码，所以我想到了这个:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        var properties = new[]
        {
            modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price),
            modelBuilder.Entity<Order>().Property(order => order.OrderTotal),
            modelBuilder.Entity<OrderDetail>().Property(detail => detail.Total),
            modelBuilder.Entity<Option>().Property(option => option.Price)
        };

        properties.ToList().ForEach(property =>
        {
            property.Precision = 10;
            property.Scale = 2;
        });

        base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
    }

在重写方法时调用基方法是一种良好的实践，即使基实现什么也不做。

更新:这篇文章也很有帮助。

编辑，从。net 6开始，这可以用precision属性代替

(精密(精度、规模))

EF Core之前的版本:

[列(TypeName = "十进制(精度，比例)")]

定义:

精度=使用的字符总数

刻度=点后的总数。(容易混淆)

例子:

using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations; //.Net Core
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore; //.NET 6+

public class Blog
{
    public int BlogId { get; set; }
    [Column(TypeName = "varchar(200)")]
    public string Url { get; set; }
    [Column(TypeName = "decimal(5, 2)")]
    public decimal Rating { get; set; }
    [Precision(28, 8)]
    public decimal RatingV6 { get; set; }
}

更多详情请访问:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/relational/data-types

这就是我正在寻找的，适用于普通的MVC项目(没有。net核心)

public class ApplicationDbContext : IdentityDbContext<ApplicationUser>
{
    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<YOUR_CLASS_NAME>().Property(x => x.YOUR_DECIAML_PROP).HasPrecision(18, 6);

        base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);

    }
}

包管理器控制台

add-migration changeDecimalPrecision

生成的迁移

    public override void Up()
    {
        AlterColumn("dbo.YOUR_CLASS_NAME", "YOUR_DECIAML_PROP", c => c.Decimal(nullable: false, precision: 18, scale: 6));
    }

使用KinSlayerUY的DecimalPrecisonAttribute，在EF6中，你可以创建一个惯例，它将处理具有该属性的单个属性(而不是像这个答案中那样设置DecimalPropertyConvention，这会影响所有的十进制属性)。

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, Inherited = false, AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class DecimalPrecisionAttribute : Attribute
{
    public DecimalPrecisionAttribute(byte precision, byte scale)
    {
        Precision = precision;
        Scale = scale;
    }
    public byte Precision { get; set; }
    public byte Scale { get; set; }
}

public class DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention
    : PrimitivePropertyAttributeConfigurationConvention<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>
{
    public override void Apply(ConventionPrimitivePropertyConfiguration configuration, DecimalPrecisionAttribute attribute)
    {
        if (attribute.Precision < 1 || attribute.Precision > 38)
        {
            throw new InvalidOperationException("Precision must be between 1 and 38.");
        }

        if (attribute.Scale > attribute.Precision)
        {
            throw new InvalidOperationException("Scale must be between 0 and the Precision value.");
        }

        configuration.HasPrecision(attribute.Precision, attribute.Scale);
    }
}

然后在DbContext中:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention());
}

@Mark007，我已经改变了DbContext的DbSet<>属性的类型选择标准。我认为这是更安全的，因为有时在给定的名称空间中有类不应该是模型定义的一部分，或者它们是但不是实体。或者您的实体可以驻留在单独的名称空间或单独的程序集中，并被拉到一个Context中。

另外，尽管不太可能，但我认为依赖于方法定义的顺序是不安全的，因此最好使用by Parameter列表将它们拉出来。(. gettypemethods()是我构建的一个扩展方法，用于使用新的TypeInfo范式，可以在查找方法时平铺类层次结构)。

请注意OnModelCreating委托给这个方法:

    private void OnModelCreatingSetDecimalPrecisionFromAttribute(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        foreach (var iSetProp in this.GetType().GetTypeProperties(true))
        {
            if (iSetProp.PropertyType.IsGenericType
                    && (iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IDbSet<>) || iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(DbSet<>)))
            {
                var entityType = iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericArguments()[0];

                foreach (var propAttr in entityType
                                        .GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
                                        .Select(p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) })
                                        .Where(propAttr => propAttr.attr != null))
                {
                    var entityTypeConfigMethod = modelBuilder.GetType().GetTypeInfo().DeclaredMethods.First(m => m.Name == "Entity");
                    var entityTypeConfig = entityTypeConfigMethod.MakeGenericMethod(entityType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);

                    var param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(entityType, "c");
                    var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name), true, new ParameterExpression[] { param });

                    var propertyConfigMethod =
                        entityTypeConfig.GetType()
                            .GetTypeMethods(true, false)
                            .First(m =>
                            {
                                if (m.Name != "Property")
                                    return false;

                                var methodParams = m.GetParameters();

                                return methodParams.Length == 1 && methodParams[0].ParameterType == lambdaExpression.GetType();
                            }
                            );

                    var decimalConfig = propertyConfigMethod.Invoke(entityTypeConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;

                    decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
                }
            }
        }
    }



    public static IEnumerable<MethodInfo> GetTypeMethods(this Type typeToQuery, bool flattenHierarchy, bool? staticMembers)
    {
        var typeInfo = typeToQuery.GetTypeInfo();

        foreach (var iField in typeInfo.DeclaredMethods.Where(fi => staticMembers == null || fi.IsStatic == staticMembers))
            yield return iField;

        //this bit is just for StaticFields so we pass flag to flattenHierarchy and for the purpose of recursion, restrictStatic = false
        if (flattenHierarchy == true)
        {
            var baseType = typeInfo.BaseType;

            if ((baseType != null) && (baseType != typeof(object)))
            {
                foreach (var iField in baseType.GetTypeMethods(true, staticMembers))
                    yield return iField;
            }
        }
    }