一般问题:什么是反转流的正确方法?假设我们不知道流由什么类型的元素组成,反转任何流的通用方法是什么?

具体问题:

IntStream提供了在特定范围内生成整数的range方法。range(-range, 0),现在我想反转它,从0到负切换范围将不起作用,我也不能使用Integer::比较

List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4);
list.stream().sorted(Integer::compare).forEach(System.out::println);

使用IntStream,我将得到这个编译器错误

错误:(191,0)ajc: IntStream类型中的sorted()方法不适用于参数(Integer::compare)

我错过了什么?


当前回答

List newStream = list.stream().sorted(Collections.reverseOrder()).collect(Collectors.toList());
        newStream.forEach(System.out::println);

其他回答

最简单的方法(simple collect -支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    return stream
            .collect(Collector.of(
                    () -> new ArrayDeque<T>(),
                    ArrayDeque::addFirst,
                    (q1, q2) -> { q2.addAll(q1); return q2; })
            )
            .stream();
}

高级方式(以持续的方式支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(stream, "stream");

    class ReverseSpliterator implements Spliterator<T> {
        private Spliterator<T> spliterator;
        private final Deque<T> deque = new ArrayDeque<>();

        private ReverseSpliterator(Spliterator<T> spliterator) {
            this.spliterator = spliterator;
        }

        @Override
        @SuppressWarnings({"StatementWithEmptyBody"})
        public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            while(spliterator.tryAdvance(deque::addFirst));
            if(!deque.isEmpty()) {
                action.accept(deque.remove());
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }

        @Override
        public Spliterator<T> trySplit() {
            // After traveling started the spliterator don't contain elements!
            Spliterator<T> prev = spliterator.trySplit();
            if(prev == null) {
                return null;
            }

            Spliterator<T> me = spliterator;
            spliterator = prev;
            return new ReverseSpliterator(me);
        }

        @Override
        public long estimateSize() {
            return spliterator.estimateSize();
        }

        @Override
        public int characteristics() {
            return spliterator.characteristics();
        }

        @Override
        public Comparator<? super T> getComparator() {
            Comparator<? super T> comparator = spliterator.getComparator();
            return (comparator != null) ? comparator.reversed() : null;
        }

        @Override
        public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            // Ensure that tryAdvance is called at least once
            if(!deque.isEmpty() || tryAdvance(action)) {
                deque.forEach(action);
            }
        }
    }

    return StreamSupport.stream(new ReverseSpliterator(stream.spliterator()), stream.isParallel());
}

注意,您可以快速扩展到其他类型的流(IntStream,…)。

测试:

// Use parallel if you wish only
revert(Stream.of("One", "Two", "Three", "Four", "Five", "Six").parallel())
    .forEachOrdered(System.out::println);

结果:

Six
Five
Four
Three
Two
One

其他注意事项:最简单的方法是,当它与其他流操作一起使用时就不那么有用了(收集连接破坏了并行性)。前进的方式就没有这个问题,它也保持了流的初始特征,比如排序,所以,它是在反向操作之后用于其他流操作的方式。

我们可以编写一个收集器,以相反的顺序收集元素:

public static <T> Collector<T, ?, Stream<T>> reversed() {
    return Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(), list -> {
        Collections.reverse(list);
        return list.stream();
    });
}

像这样使用它:

Stream.of(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).collect(reversed()).forEach(System.out::println);

原来的答案(包含一个错误-它不能正确工作的并行流):

一个通用的流反向方法可以是这样的:

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    LinkedList<T> stack = new LinkedList<>();
    stream.forEach(stack::push);
    return stack.stream();
}

反转流的正确通用方法是什么?

如果流没有指定遇到顺序,就不要这样做。 (! s.spliterator () .hasCharacteristics (java.util.Spliterator.ORDERED))

Java 8的方法:

    List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4);
    Comparator<Integer> comparator = Integer::compare;
    list.stream().sorted(comparator.reversed()).forEach(System.out::println);

我就是这么做的。

我不喜欢创建一个新集合并反向迭代它的想法。

IntStream#映射的想法是非常整洁的,但我更喜欢IntStream#迭代方法,因为我认为倒计时到零的想法更好地表达了迭代方法,更容易理解从后面到前面的数组行走。

import static java.lang.Math.max;

private static final double EXACT_MATCH = 0d;

public static IntStream reverseStream(final int[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).map(index -> array[index]);
}

public static DoubleStream reverseStream(final double[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToDouble(index -> array[index]);
}

public static <T> Stream<T> reverseStream(final T[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToObj(index -> array[index]);
}

public static IntStream countdownFrom(final int top) {
    return IntStream.iterate(top, t -> t - 1).limit(max(0, (long) top + 1));
}

下面是一些测试来证明它是有效的:

import static java.lang.Integer.MAX_VALUE;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

@Test
public void testReverseStream_emptyArrayCreatesEmptyStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(0, reverseStream(new double[0]).count());
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_singleElementCreatesSingleElementStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(1, reverseStream(new double[1]).count());
    final double[] singleElementArray = new double[] { 123.4 };
    assertArrayEquals(singleElementArray, reverseStream(singleElementArray).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_multipleElementsAreStreamedInReversedOrder() {
    final double[] arr = new double[] { 1d, 2d, 3d };
    final double[] revArr = new double[] { 3d, 2d, 1d };
    Assert.assertEquals(arr.length, reverseStream(arr).count());
    Assert.assertArrayEquals(revArr, reverseStream(arr).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_returnsAllElementsFromTopToZeroInReverseOrder() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 }, countdownFrom(4).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_countingDownStartingWithZeroOutputsTheNumberZero() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 0 }, countdownFrom(0).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_doesNotChokeOnIntegerMaxValue() {
    assertEquals(true, countdownFrom(MAX_VALUE).anyMatch(x -> x == MAX_VALUE));
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_givesZeroLengthCountForNegativeValues() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-1).toArray());
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-4).toArray());
}