我尝试在<div>上使用innerHTML加载一些脚本到页面中。脚本似乎加载到DOM中,但它从未执行(至少在Firefox和Chrome中)。有一种方法让脚本执行时插入他们与innerHTML?
示例代码:
<!DOCTYPE html >
< html >
<身体onload = " . getelementbyid(机)。innerHTML = '<script>alert(\'hi\')<\/script>'">
难道不应该出现“hi”的提醒吗?
< div id = "装载机" > < / div >
身体< / >
< / html >
Gabriel Garcia提到的mutationobserver是正确的,但对我来说不太管用。我不确定这是因为浏览器的怪癖还是因为我自己的错误,但最终适合我的版本是:
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function(event) {
var observer = new MutationObserver(mutations=>{
mutations.map(mutation=>{
Array.from(mutation.addedNodes).map(node=>{
if (node.tagName === "SCRIPT") {
var s = document.createElement("script");
s.text=node.text;
if (typeof(node.parentElement.added) === 'undefined')
node.parentElement.added = [];
node.parentElement.added[node.parentElement.added.length] = s;
node.parentElement.removeChild(node);
document.head.appendChild(s);
}
})
})
})
observer.observe(document.getElementById("element_to_watch"), {childList: true, subtree: true,attributes: false});
};
当然,您应该将element_to_watch替换为要修改的元素的名称。
node.parentElement.added用于存储添加到document.head的脚本标记。在用于加载外部页面的函数中,您可以使用如下内容删除不再相关的脚本标记:
function freeScripts(node){
if (node === null)
return;
if (typeof(node.added) === 'object') {
for (var script in node.added) {
document.head.removeChild(node.added[script]);
}
node.added = {};
}
for (var child in node.children) {
freeScripts(node.children[child]);
}
}
这是一个load函数开始的例子:
function load(url, id, replace) {
if (document.getElementById(id) === null) {
console.error("Element of ID "+id + " does not exist!");
return;
}
freeScripts(document.getElementById(id));
var xhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
// proceed to load in the page and modify innerHTML
}
对于任何仍然试图这样做的人来说,不,您不能使用innerHTML注入脚本,但可以使用Blob和URL.createObjectURL将字符串加载到脚本标记中。
我已经创建了一个例子,让你运行一个字符串作为脚本,并通过一个承诺获得脚本的“exports”:
function loadScript(scriptContent, moduleId) {
// create the script tag
var scriptElement = document.createElement('SCRIPT');
// create a promise which will resolve to the script's 'exports'
// (i.e., the value returned by the script)
var promise = new Promise(function(resolve) {
scriptElement.onload = function() {
var exports = window["__loadScript_exports_" + moduleId];
delete window["__loadScript_exports_" + moduleId];
resolve(exports);
}
});
// wrap the script contents to expose exports through a special property
// the promise will access the exports this way
var wrappedScriptContent =
"(function() { window['__loadScript_exports_" + moduleId + "'] = " +
scriptContent + "})()";
// create a blob from the wrapped script content
var scriptBlob = new Blob([wrappedScriptContent], {type: 'text/javascript'});
// set the id attribute
scriptElement.id = "__loadScript_module_" + moduleId;
// set the src attribute to the blob's object url
// (this is the part that makes it work)
scriptElement.src = URL.createObjectURL(scriptBlob);
// append the script element
document.body.appendChild(scriptElement);
// return the promise, which will resolve to the script's exports
return promise;
}
...
function doTheThing() {
// no evals
loadScript('5 + 5').then(function(exports) {
// should log 10
console.log(exports)
});
}
我从我的实际实现中简化了它,所以不能保证它没有任何错误。但是这个原理是可行的。
如果你不关心在脚本运行后得到什么值,那就更简单了;只要省略承诺和加载部分。您甚至不需要包装脚本或创建全局窗口。__load_script_exports_财产。