如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
如何将一个数除3而不使用*、/、+、-、%等运算符?
号码可以有签名,也可以没有签名。
当前回答
(注意:查看下面的编辑2以获得更好的版本!)
这并不像听起来那么棘手,因为你说“没有使用[..+[…]运营商”。如果你想禁止同时使用+字符,请参见下面。
unsigned div_by(unsigned const x, unsigned const by) {
unsigned floor = 0;
for (unsigned cmp = 0, r = 0; cmp <= x;) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < by; i++)
cmp++; // that's not the + operator!
floor = r;
r++; // neither is this.
}
return floor;
}
然后用div_by(100,3)将100除以3。
编辑:你可以继续并替换++操作符:
unsigned inc(unsigned x) {
for (unsigned mask = 1; mask; mask <<= 1) {
if (mask & x)
x &= ~mask;
else
return x & mask;
}
return 0; // overflow (note that both x and mask are 0 here)
}
编辑2:稍快的版本,不使用任何包含+、-、*、/、%字符的操作符。
unsigned add(char const zero[], unsigned const x, unsigned const y) {
// this exploits that &foo[bar] == foo+bar if foo is of type char*
return (int)(uintptr_t)(&((&zero[x])[y]));
}
unsigned div_by(unsigned const x, unsigned const by) {
unsigned floor = 0;
for (unsigned cmp = 0, r = 0; cmp <= x;) {
cmp = add(0,cmp,by);
floor = r;
r = add(0,r,1);
}
return floor;
}
我们使用add函数的第一个参数,因为不使用*字符就不能表示指针的类型,除非在函数形参列表中,其中的语法类型[]与类型* const相同。
FWIW,你可以很容易地实现一个乘法函数使用类似的技巧使用0x55555556技巧提出的AndreyT:
int mul(int const x, int const y) {
return sizeof(struct {
char const ignore[y];
}[x]);
}
其他回答
很好bc:
$ num=1337; printf "scale=5;${num}\x2F3;\n" | bc
445.66666
要将一个32位数字除以3,可以将其乘以0x55555556,然后取64位结果的前32位。
现在剩下要做的就是使用位运算和移位来实现乘法…
好吧,我想我们都同意这不是一个现实世界的问题。为了好玩,这里是如何用Ada和多线程来做这件事:
with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Divide_By_3 is
protected type Divisor_Type is
entry Poke;
entry Finish;
private
entry Release;
entry Stop_Emptying;
Emptying : Boolean := False;
end Divisor_Type;
protected type Collector_Type is
entry Poke;
entry Finish;
private
Emptying : Boolean := False;
end Collector_Type;
task type Input is
end Input;
task type Output is
end Output;
protected body Divisor_Type is
entry Poke when not Emptying and Stop_Emptying'Count = 0 is
begin
requeue Release;
end Poke;
entry Release when Release'Count >= 3 or Emptying is
New_Output : access Output;
begin
if not Emptying then
New_Output := new Output;
Emptying := True;
requeue Stop_Emptying;
end if;
end Release;
entry Stop_Emptying when Release'Count = 0 is
begin
Emptying := False;
end Stop_Emptying;
entry Finish when Poke'Count = 0 and Release'Count < 3 is
begin
Emptying := True;
requeue Stop_Emptying;
end Finish;
end Divisor_Type;
protected body Collector_Type is
entry Poke when Emptying is
begin
null;
end Poke;
entry Finish when True is
begin
Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Poke'Count'Img);
Emptying := True;
end Finish;
end Collector_Type;
Collector : Collector_Type;
Divisor : Divisor_Type;
task body Input is
begin
Divisor.Poke;
end Input;
task body Output is
begin
Collector.Poke;
end Output;
Cur_Input : access Input;
-- Input value:
Number : Integer := 18;
begin
for I in 1 .. Number loop
Cur_Input := new Input;
end loop;
Divisor.Finish;
Collector.Finish;
end Divide_By_3;
并不是所有的答案都是面试官想听到的:
我的回答:
“我绝不会那样做,谁会为这种愚蠢的事情付出代价呢?”没有人 会有一个优势,它不是更快,它只是愚蠢。 教授设计师必须知道这一点,但这必须适用于所有数字,而不仅仅是除以3。”
这个方法(c#)怎么样?
private int dividedBy3(int n) {
List<Object> a = new Object[n].ToList();
List<Object> b = new List<object>();
while (a.Count > 2) {
a.RemoveRange(0, 3);
b.Add(new Object());
}
return b.Count;
}