如何迭代由空格分隔的单词组成的字符串中的单词?

注意,我对C字符串函数或那种字符操作/访问不感兴趣。比起效率,我更喜欢优雅。我当前的解决方案:

#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

int main() {
    string s = "Somewhere down the road";
    istringstream iss(s);

    do {
        string subs;
        iss >> subs;
        cout << "Substring: " << subs << endl;
    } while (iss);
}

当前回答

对于一个大得离谱而且可能是冗余的版本,可以尝试很多For循环。

string stringlist[10];
int count = 0;

for (int i = 0; i < sequence.length(); i++)
{
    if (sequence[i] == ' ')
    {
        stringlist[count] = sequence.substr(0, i);
        sequence.erase(0, i+1);
        i = 0;
        count++;
    }
    else if (i == sequence.length()-1)  // Last word
    {
        stringlist[count] = sequence.substr(0, i+1);
    }
}

它并不漂亮,但总的来说(除了标点符号和一系列其他错误)它是有效的!

其他回答

我有一种与其他解决方案非常不同的方法,它提供了很多其他解决方案所缺乏的价值,但当然也有其缺点。这是一个工作实现,示例是在单词周围放置<tag></tag>。

首先,这个问题可以通过一个循环解决,不需要额外的内存,只需考虑四种逻辑情况。从概念上讲,我们对边界感兴趣。我们的代码应该反映出这一点:让我们遍历字符串,一次查看两个字符,记住字符串的开头和结尾都有特殊情况。

缺点是我们必须编写实现,这有点冗长,但大多是方便的样板。

好处是我们编写了实现,因此很容易根据特定的需要定制它,例如区分左和写单词边界,使用任何一组分隔符,或处理其他情况,例如无边界或错误位置。

using namespace std;

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

#include <cctype>

typedef enum boundary_type_e {
    E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_ERROR = -1,
    E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_NONE,
    E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_LEFT,
    E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_RIGHT,
} boundary_type_t;

typedef struct boundary_s {
    boundary_type_t type;
    int pos;
} boundary_t;

bool is_delim_char(int c) {
    return isspace(c); // also compare against any other chars you want to use as delimiters
}

bool is_word_char(int c) {
    return ' ' <= c && c <= '~' && !is_delim_char(c);
}

boundary_t maybe_word_boundary(string str, int pos) {
    int len = str.length();
    if (pos < 0 || pos >= len) {
        return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_ERROR};
    } else {
        if (pos == 0 && is_word_char(str[pos])) {
            // if the first character is word-y, we have a left boundary at the beginning
            return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_LEFT, .pos = pos};
        } else if (pos == len - 1 && is_word_char(str[pos])) {
            // if the last character is word-y, we have a right boundary left of the null terminator
            return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_RIGHT, .pos = pos + 1};
        } else if (!is_word_char(str[pos]) && is_word_char(str[pos + 1])) {
            // if we have a delimiter followed by a word char, we have a left boundary left of the word char
            return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_LEFT, .pos = pos + 1};
        } else if (is_word_char(str[pos]) && !is_word_char(str[pos + 1])) {
            // if we have a word char followed by a delimiter, we have a right boundary right of the word char
            return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_RIGHT, .pos = pos + 1};
        }
        return (boundary_t){.type = E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_NONE};
    }
}

int main() {
    string str;
    getline(cin, str);

    int len = str.length();
    for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
        boundary_t boundary = maybe_word_boundary(str, i);
        if (boundary.type == E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_LEFT) {
            // whatever
        } else if (boundary.type == E_BOUNDARY_TYPE_RIGHT) {
            // whatever
        }
    }
}

正如您所看到的,代码非常容易理解和微调,代码的实际使用非常简短和简单。使用C++不应阻止我们编写最简单、最容易定制的代码,即使这意味着不使用STL。我认为这是Linus Torvalds所说的“品味”的一个例子,因为我们已经消除了所有不需要的逻辑,而写作风格自然允许在需要处理的时候处理更多的案件。

可以改进此代码的可能是使用enum类,在maybe_word_boundary中接受指向is_word_char的函数指针,而不是直接调用is_word_char,并传递lambda。

这里有一个仅使用标准正则表达式库的正则表达式解决方案。(我有点生疏,所以可能会有一些语法错误,但这至少是一般的想法)

#include <regex.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <vector.h>

using namespace std;

vector<string> split(string s){
    regex r ("\\w+"); //regex matches whole words, (greedy, so no fragment words)
    regex_iterator<string::iterator> rit ( s.begin(), s.end(), r );
    regex_iterator<string::iterator> rend; //iterators to iterate thru words
    vector<string> result<regex_iterator>(rit, rend);
    return result;  //iterates through the matches to fill the vector
}

我使用这个simpleton是因为我们得到了字符串类“特殊”(即非标准):

void splitString(const String &s, const String &delim, std::vector<String> &result) {
    const int l = delim.length();
    int f = 0;
    int i = s.indexOf(delim,f);
    while (i>=0) {
        String token( i-f > 0 ? s.substring(f,i-f) : "");
        result.push_back(token);
        f=i+l;
        i = s.indexOf(delim,f);
    }
    String token = s.substring(f);
    result.push_back(token);
}

这是我最喜欢的遍历字符串的方法。每个词你都可以做你想做的事。

string line = "a line of text to iterate through";
string word;

istringstream iss(line, istringstream::in);

while( iss >> word )     
{
    // Do something on `word` here...
}

下面是一个更好的方法。它可以接受任何字符,除非您愿意,否则不会拆分行。不需要特殊的库(嗯,除了std,但谁真的认为这是一个额外的库),没有指针,没有引用,而且它是静态的。只是简单的C++。

#pragma once
#include <vector>
#include <sstream>
using namespace std;
class Helpers
{
    public:
        static vector<string> split(string s, char delim)
        {
            stringstream temp (stringstream::in | stringstream::out);
            vector<string> elems(0);
            if (s.size() == 0 || delim == 0)
                return elems;
            for(char c : s)
            {
                if(c == delim)
                {
                    elems.push_back(temp.str());
                    temp = stringstream(stringstream::in | stringstream::out);
                }
                else
                    temp << c;
            }
            if (temp.str().size() > 0)
                elems.push_back(temp.str());
                return elems;
            }

        //Splits string s with a list of delimiters in delims (it's just a list, like if we wanted to
        //split at the following letters, a, b, c we would make delims="abc".
        static vector<string> split(string s, string delims)
        {
            stringstream temp (stringstream::in | stringstream::out);
            vector<string> elems(0);
            bool found;
            if(s.size() == 0 || delims.size() == 0)
                return elems;
            for(char c : s)
            {
                found = false;
                for(char d : delims)
                {
                    if (c == d)
                    {
                        elems.push_back(temp.str());
                        temp = stringstream(stringstream::in | stringstream::out);
                        found = true;
                        break;
                    }
                }
                if(!found)
                    temp << c;
            }
            if(temp.str().size() > 0)
                elems.push_back(temp.str());
            return elems;
        }
};