我如何使用预递增/递减操作符(++,——),就像在c++ ?
为什么++计数运行,但不改变变量的值?
我如何使用预递增/递减操作符(++,——),就像在c++ ?
为什么++计数运行,但不改变变量的值?
当前回答
++不是运算符。它是两个+运算符。+运算符是单位运算符,它什么也不做。(澄清:+和-一元操作符仅适用于数字,但我假定您不会期望假设的++操作符适用于字符串。)
++count
解析为
+(+count)
翻译过来就是
count
你必须使用稍微长一点的+=运算符来做你想做的事情:
count += 1
我怀疑省略++和——操作符是为了保持一致性和简单性。我不知道Guido van Rossum为这个决定给出的确切理由,但我可以想象出一些理由:
Simpler parsing. Technically, parsing ++count is ambiguous, as it could be +, +, count (two unary + operators) just as easily as it could be ++, count (one unary ++ operator). It's not a significant syntactic ambiguity, but it does exist. Simpler language. ++ is nothing more than a synonym for += 1. It was a shorthand invented because C compilers were stupid and didn't know how to optimize a += 1 into the inc instruction most computers have. In this day of optimizing compilers and bytecode interpreted languages, adding operators to a language to allow programmers to optimize their code is usually frowned upon, especially in a language like Python that is designed to be consistent and readable. Confusing side-effects. One common newbie error in languages with ++ operators is mixing up the differences (both in precedence and in return value) between the pre- and post-increment/decrement operators, and Python likes to eliminate language "gotcha"-s. The precedence issues of pre-/post-increment in C are pretty hairy, and incredibly easy to mess up.
其他回答
++不是运算符。它是两个+运算符。+运算符是单位运算符,它什么也不做。(澄清:+和-一元操作符仅适用于数字,但我假定您不会期望假设的++操作符适用于字符串。)
++count
解析为
+(+count)
翻译过来就是
count
你必须使用稍微长一点的+=运算符来做你想做的事情:
count += 1
我怀疑省略++和——操作符是为了保持一致性和简单性。我不知道Guido van Rossum为这个决定给出的确切理由,但我可以想象出一些理由:
Simpler parsing. Technically, parsing ++count is ambiguous, as it could be +, +, count (two unary + operators) just as easily as it could be ++, count (one unary ++ operator). It's not a significant syntactic ambiguity, but it does exist. Simpler language. ++ is nothing more than a synonym for += 1. It was a shorthand invented because C compilers were stupid and didn't know how to optimize a += 1 into the inc instruction most computers have. In this day of optimizing compilers and bytecode interpreted languages, adding operators to a language to allow programmers to optimize their code is usually frowned upon, especially in a language like Python that is designed to be consistent and readable. Confusing side-effects. One common newbie error in languages with ++ operators is mixing up the differences (both in precedence and in return value) between the pre- and post-increment/decrement operators, and Python likes to eliminate language "gotcha"-s. The precedence issues of pre-/post-increment in C are pretty hairy, and incredibly easy to mess up.
Python没有这些操作符,但如果你真的需要它们,你可以编写一个具有相同功能的函数。
def PreIncrement(name, local={}):
#Equivalent to ++name
if name in local:
local[name]+=1
return local[name]
globals()[name]+=1
return globals()[name]
def PostIncrement(name, local={}):
#Equivalent to name++
if name in local:
local[name]+=1
return local[name]-1
globals()[name]+=1
return globals()[name]-1
用法:
x = 1
y = PreIncrement('x') #y and x are both 2
a = 1
b = PostIncrement('a') #b is 1 and a is 2
在函数内部,如果你想改变局部变量,你必须添加locals()作为第二个参数,否则它将尝试改变全局变量。
x = 1
def test():
x = 10
y = PreIncrement('x') #y will be 2, local x will be still 10 and global x will be changed to 2
z = PreIncrement('x', locals()) #z will be 11, local x will be 11 and global x will be unaltered
test()
还有这些函数,你可以做:
x = 1
print(PreIncrement('x')) #print(x+=1) is illegal!
但在我看来,以下方法更清晰:
x = 1
x+=1
print(x)
递减运算符:
def PreDecrement(name, local={}):
#Equivalent to --name
if name in local:
local[name]-=1
return local[name]
globals()[name]-=1
return globals()[name]
def PostDecrement(name, local={}):
#Equivalent to name--
if name in local:
local[name]-=1
return local[name]+1
globals()[name]-=1
return globals()[name]+1
我使用这些函数在我的模块翻译javascript到python。
一个直截了当的解决办法
c = 0
c = (lambda c_plusplus: plusplus+1)(c)
print(c)
1
不再打字
c = c + 1
你也可以直接写 c++ 完成所有代码,然后搜索/替换“c++”,替换为“c=c+1”。只要确保正则表达式搜索是关闭的。
是的,我也错过了++和-功能。几百万行c代码让这种想法在我的老头脑中根深蒂固,而不是与它斗争……这里是一个我拼凑起来实现的类:
pre- and post-increment, pre- and post-decrement, addition,
subtraction, multiplication, division, results assignable
as integer, printable, settable.
这里的是:
class counter(object):
def __init__(self,v=0):
self.set(v)
def preinc(self):
self.v += 1
return self.v
def predec(self):
self.v -= 1
return self.v
def postinc(self):
self.v += 1
return self.v - 1
def postdec(self):
self.v -= 1
return self.v + 1
def __add__(self,addend):
return self.v + addend
def __sub__(self,subtrahend):
return self.v - subtrahend
def __mul__(self,multiplier):
return self.v * multiplier
def __div__(self,divisor):
return self.v / divisor
def __getitem__(self):
return self.v
def __str__(self):
return str(self.v)
def set(self,v):
if type(v) != int:
v = 0
self.v = v
你可以这样使用它:
c = counter() # defaults to zero
for listItem in myList: # imaginary task
doSomething(c.postinc(),listItem) # passes c, but becomes c+1
...已经有了c,你可以这样做。
c.set(11)
while c.predec() > 0:
print c
....或者只是……
d = counter(11)
while d.predec() > 0:
print d
...和(重)赋值为整数…
c = counter(100)
d = c + 223 # assignment as integer
c = c + 223 # re-assignment as integer
print type(c),c # <type 'int'> 323
...而这将保持c作为类型计数器:
c = counter(100)
c.set(c + 223)
print type(c),c # <class '__main__.counter'> 323
编辑:
还有一点出乎意料(完全不受欢迎)的行为,
c = counter(42)
s = '%s: %d' % ('Expecting 42',c) # but getting non-numeric exception
print s
...因为在该元组中,没有使用getitem(),而是将对象的引用传递给格式化函数。叹息。所以:
c = counter(42)
s = '%s: %d' % ('Expecting 42',c.v) # and getting 42.
print s
...或者,更详细,更明确地说,我们实际上想要发生什么,尽管在实际形式中与冗长相反(使用c.v代替)……
c = counter(42)
s = '%s: %d' % ('Expecting 42',c.__getitem__()) # and getting 42.
print s
扩展Henry的回答,我实验性地实现了一个语法糖库,实现了++:hdytto。
使用方法简单。从PyPI安装后,放置sitecustomize.py:
from hdytto import register_hdytto
register_hdytto()
在项目目录中。然后,使main.py:
# coding: hdytto
a = 5
print(a++)
print(++a)
b = 10 - --a
print(b--)
并通过PYTHONPATH=运行它。python main.py。输出将是
5
7
4
在解码脚本文件时,Hdytto将++替换为((a:=a+1)-1),因此它可以工作。