我是这样做的:

declare @RowNum int, @CustId nchar(5), @Name1 nchar(25)

select @CustId=MAX(USERID) FROM UserIDs     --start with the highest ID
Select @RowNum = Count(*) From UserIDs      --get total number of records
WHILE @RowNum > 0                          --loop until no more records
BEGIN   
    select @Name1 = username1 from UserIDs where USERID= @CustID    --get other info from that row
    print cast(@RowNum as char(12)) + ' ' + @CustId + ' ' + @Name1  --do whatever

    select top 1 @CustId=USERID from UserIDs where USERID < @CustID order by USERID desc--get the next one
    set @RowNum = @RowNum - 1                               --decrease count
END

没有游标，没有临时表，没有额外的列。 USERID列必须是唯一的整数，就像大多数主键一样。

我真的不明白为什么你需要使用可怕的光标。 但是如果你使用的是2005/2008版本的SQL Server，还有另一种选择 使用递归

declare @databases table
(
    DatabaseID    int,
    Name        varchar(15),   
    Server      varchar(15)
)

--; Insert records into @databases...

--; Recurse through @databases
;with DBs as (
    select * from @databases where DatabaseID = 1
    union all
    select A.* from @databases A 
        inner join DBs B on A.DatabaseID = B.DatabaseID + 1
)
select * from DBs

我将提供基于集合的解决方案。

insert  @databases (DatabaseID, Name, Server)
select DatabaseID, Name, Server 
From ... (Use whatever query you would have used in the loop or cursor)

这比任何循环技术都要快得多，而且更容易编写和维护。

-- [PO_RollBackOnReject]  'FININV10532'
alter procedure PO_RollBackOnReject
@CaseID nvarchar(100)

AS
Begin
SELECT  *
INTO    #tmpTable
FROM   PO_InvoiceItems where CaseID = @CaseID

Declare @Id int
Declare @PO_No int
Declare @Current_Balance Money


While (Select ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY PO_LineNo DESC) From #tmpTable) > 0
Begin
        Select Top 1 @Id = PO_LineNo, @Current_Balance = Current_Balance,
        @PO_No = PO_No
        From #Temp
        update PO_Details
        Set  Current_Balance = Current_Balance + @Current_Balance,
            Previous_App_Amount= Previous_App_Amount + @Current_Balance,
            Is_Processed = 0
        Where PO_LineNumber = @Id
        AND PO_No = @PO_No
        update PO_InvoiceItems
        Set IsVisible = 0,
        Is_Processed= 0
        ,Is_InProgress = 0 , 
        Is_Active = 0
        Where PO_LineNo = @Id
        AND PO_No = @PO_No
End
End

首先，你应该绝对确定你需要遍历每一行——基于行集的操作在我能想到的任何情况下都会执行得更快，通常会使用更简单的代码。

根据您的数据，可能只使用SELECT语句循环，如下所示:

Declare @Id int

While (Select Count(*) From ATable Where Processed = 0) > 0
Begin
    Select Top 1 @Id = Id From ATable Where Processed = 0

    --Do some processing here

    Update ATable Set Processed = 1 Where Id = @Id 

End

另一种方法是使用临时表:

Select *
Into   #Temp
From   ATable

Declare @Id int

While (Select Count(*) From #Temp) > 0
Begin

    Select Top 1 @Id = Id From #Temp

    --Do some processing here

    Delete #Temp Where Id = @Id

End

您应该选择的选项实际上取决于数据的结构和容量。

注意:如果您正在使用SQL Server，您将更好地使用:

WHILE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM #Temp)

使用COUNT将不得不触及表中的每一行，EXISTS只需要触及第一行(参见Josef的回答)。

可以使用游标来做到这一点:

创建函数[dbo].f_teste_loop 返回@tabela表 （ 鳕鱼int, 省varchar (10) ） 作为 开始

insert into @tabela values (1, 'verde');
insert into @tabela values (2, 'amarelo');
insert into @tabela values (3, 'azul');
insert into @tabela values (4, 'branco');

return;

end

创建过程[dbo].[sp_test_loop] 作为 开始

DECLARE @cod int, @nome varchar(10);

DECLARE curLoop CURSOR STATIC LOCAL 
FOR
SELECT  
    cod
   ,nome
FROM 
    dbo.f_teste_loop();

OPEN curLoop;

FETCH NEXT FROM curLoop
           INTO @cod, @nome;

WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)
BEGIN
    PRINT @nome;

    FETCH NEXT FROM curLoop
           INTO @cod, @nome;
END

CLOSE curLoop;
DEALLOCATE curLoop;

end