假设我有以下简单的表变量:

declare @databases table
(
    DatabaseID    int,
    Name        varchar(15),   
    Server      varchar(15)
)
-- insert a bunch rows into @databases

如果我想遍历各行,声明和使用游标是我唯一的选择吗?还有别的办法吗?


当前回答

首先,你应该绝对确定你需要遍历每一行——基于行集的操作在我能想到的任何情况下都会执行得更快,通常会使用更简单的代码。

根据您的数据,可能只使用SELECT语句循环,如下所示:

Declare @Id int

While (Select Count(*) From ATable Where Processed = 0) > 0
Begin
    Select Top 1 @Id = Id From ATable Where Processed = 0

    --Do some processing here

    Update ATable Set Processed = 1 Where Id = @Id 

End

另一种方法是使用临时表:

Select *
Into   #Temp
From   ATable

Declare @Id int

While (Select Count(*) From #Temp) > 0
Begin

    Select Top 1 @Id = Id From #Temp

    --Do some processing here

    Delete #Temp Where Id = @Id

End

您应该选择的选项实际上取决于数据的结构和容量。

注意:如果您正在使用SQL Server,您将更好地使用:

WHILE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM #Temp)

使用COUNT将不得不触及表中的每一行,EXISTS只需要触及第一行(参见Josef的回答)。

其他回答

轻量级,不需要创建额外的表,如果您在表上有一个整数ID

Declare @id int = 0, @anything nvarchar(max)
WHILE(1=1) BEGIN
  Select Top 1 @anything=[Anything],@id=@id+1 FROM Table WHERE ID>@id
  if(@@ROWCOUNT=0) break;

  --Process @anything

END

这是我使用的2008 R2代码。我使用的这段代码是在所有故事的关键字段(SSNO & EMPR_NO)上构建索引

if object_ID('tempdb..#a')is not NULL drop table #a

select 'IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sysindexes WHERE name ='+CHAR(39)+''+'IDX_'+COLUMN_NAME+'_'+SUBSTRING(table_name,5,len(table_name)-3)+char(39)+')' 
+' begin DROP INDEX [IDX_'+COLUMN_NAME+'_'+SUBSTRING(table_name,5,len(table_name)-3)+'] ON '+table_schema+'.'+table_name+' END Create index IDX_'+COLUMN_NAME+'_'+SUBSTRING(table_name,5,len(table_name)-3)+ ' on '+ table_schema+'.'+table_name+' ('+COLUMN_NAME+') '   'Field'
,ROW_NUMBER() over (order by table_NAMe) as  'ROWNMBR'
into #a
from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
where (COLUMN_NAME like '%_SSNO_%' or COLUMN_NAME like'%_EMPR_NO_')
    and TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo'

declare @loopcntr int
declare @ROW int
declare @String nvarchar(1000)
set @loopcntr=(select count(*)  from #a)
set @ROW=1  

while (@ROW <= @loopcntr)
    begin
        select top 1 @String=a.Field 
        from #A a
        where a.ROWNMBR = @ROW
        execute sp_executesql @String
        set @ROW = @ROW + 1
    end 

另一种不需要改变模式或使用临时表的方法:

DECLARE @rowCount int = 0
  ,@currentRow int = 1
  ,@databaseID int
  ,@name varchar(15)
  ,@server varchar(15);

SELECT @rowCount = COUNT(*)
FROM @databases;

WHILE (@currentRow <= @rowCount)
BEGIN
  SELECT TOP 1
     @databaseID = rt.[DatabaseID]
    ,@name = rt.[Name]
    ,@server = rt.[Server]
  FROM (
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
        ORDER BY t.[DatabaseID], t.[Name], t.[Server]
       ) AS [RowNumber]
      ,t.[DatabaseID]
      ,t.[Name]
      ,t.[Server]
    FROM @databases t
  ) rt
  WHERE rt.[RowNumber] = @currentRow;

  EXEC [your_stored_procedure] @databaseID, @name, @server;

  SET @currentRow = @currentRow + 1;
END

如果您别无选择,只能逐行创建FAST_FORWARD游标。它和构建while循环一样快,而且更容易长期维护。

FAST_FORWARD 指定一个启用性能优化的FORWARD_ONLY、READ_ONLY游标。如果还指定了SCROLL或FOR_UPDATE,则FAST_FORWARD不能指定。

我将提供基于集合的解决方案。

insert  @databases (DatabaseID, Name, Server)
select DatabaseID, Name, Server 
From ... (Use whatever query you would have used in the loop or cursor)

这比任何循环技术都要快得多,而且更容易编写和维护。