一个快速的解决方法是使函数全局化

from multiprocessing import Pool


class Test:
    def __init__(self, x):
        self.x = x
    
    @staticmethod
    def test(x):
        return x**2


    def test_apply(self, list_):
        global r
        def r(x):
            return Test.test(x + self.x)

        with Pool() as p:
            l = p.map(r, list_)

        return l



if __name__ == '__main__':
    o = Test(2)
    print(o.test_apply(range(10)))

正如其他人所说，多处理只能将Python对象转移到可以pickle的工作进程。如果您不能像unutbu所描述的那样重新组织代码，您可以使用dills扩展的pickle /unpickling功能来传输数据(特别是代码数据)，如下所示。

这个解决方案只需要安装dill，而不需要像pathos这样的其他库:

import os
from multiprocessing import Pool

import dill


def run_dill_encoded(payload):
    fun, args = dill.loads(payload)
    return fun(*args)


def apply_async(pool, fun, args):
    payload = dill.dumps((fun, args))
    return pool.apply_async(run_dill_encoded, (payload,))


if __name__ == "__main__":

    pool = Pool(processes=5)

    # asyn execution of lambda
    jobs = []
    for i in range(10):
        job = apply_async(pool, lambda a, b: (a, b, a * b), (i, i + 1))
        jobs.append(job)

    for job in jobs:
        print job.get()
    print

    # async execution of static method

    class O(object):

        @staticmethod
        def calc():
            return os.getpid()

    jobs = []
    for i in range(10):
        job = apply_async(pool, O.calc, ())
        jobs.append(job)

    for job in jobs:
        print job.get()

正如@penky Suresh在这个回答中建议的那样，不要使用内置关键字。

显然，args是处理多处理时的内置关键字

class TTS:
    def __init__(self):
        pass

    def process_and_render_items(self):
        multiprocessing_args = [{"a": "b", "c": "d"}, {"e": "f", "g": "h"}]

        with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as executor:
          # Using args here is fine. 
            future_processes = {
              executor.submit(TTS.process_and_render_item, args)
                for args in multiprocessing_args
            }

            for future in as_completed(future_processes):
                try:
                    data = future.result()
                except Exception as exc:
                    print(f"Generated an exception: {exc}")
                else:
                   print(f"Generated data for comment process: {future}")
 

    # Dont use 'args' here. It seems to be a built-in keyword.
    # Changing 'args' to 'arg' worked for me.
    def process_and_render_item(arg):
        print(arg)
      # This will print {"a": "b", "c": "d"} for the first process
      # and {"e": "f", "g": "h"} for the second process.

PS:制表符/空格可能有点不对。

当多处理出现这个问题时，一个简单的解决方案是从Pool切换到ThreadPool。除了import-，无需更改其他代码即可完成此操作

from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool as Pool

这是因为ThreadPool与主线程共享内存，而不是创建一个新进程——这意味着不需要pickle。

The downside to this method is that python isn't the greatest language with handling threads- it uses something called the Global Interpreter Lock to stay thread safe, which can slow down some use cases here. However, if you're primarily interacting with other systems (running HTTP commands, talking with a database, writing to filesystems) then your code is likely not bound by CPU and won't take much of a hit. In fact I've found when writing HTTP/HTTPS benchmarks that the threaded model used here has less overhead and delays, as the overhead from creating new processes is much higher than the overhead for creating new threads and the program was otherwise just waiting for HTTP responses.

所以如果你在python用户空间中处理大量的东西，这可能不是最好的方法。

我会用悲怆。多处理，而不是多处理。感伤。Multiprocessing是Multiprocessing的一个分支，使用莳萝。Dill几乎可以序列化python中的任何东西，因此您可以并行地发送更多内容。正如类方法所需要的那样，pathos fork还能够直接使用多个参数函数。

>>> from pathos.multiprocessing import ProcessingPool as Pool
>>> p = Pool(4)
>>> class Test(object):
...   def plus(self, x, y): 
...     return x+y
... 
>>> t = Test()
>>> p.map(t.plus, x, y)
[4, 6, 8, 10]
>>> 
>>> class Foo(object):
...   @staticmethod
...   def work(self, x):
...     return x+1
... 
>>> f = Foo()
>>> p.apipe(f.work, f, 100)
<processing.pool.ApplyResult object at 0x10504f8d0>
>>> res = _
>>> res.get()
101

在这里获得感伤(如果你喜欢，莳萝): https://github.com/uqfoundation

基于@rocksportrocker解决方案， 在发送和RECVing结果时使用dill是有意义的。

import dill
import itertools
def run_dill_encoded(payload):
    fun, args = dill.loads(payload)
    res = fun(*args)
    res = dill.dumps(res)
    return res

def dill_map_async(pool, fun, args_list,
                   as_tuple=True,
                   **kw):
    if as_tuple:
        args_list = ((x,) for x in args_list)

    it = itertools.izip(
        itertools.cycle([fun]),
        args_list)
    it = itertools.imap(dill.dumps, it)
    return pool.map_async(run_dill_encoded, it, **kw)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    import multiprocessing as mp
    import sys,os
    p = mp.Pool(4)
    res = dill_map_async(p, lambda x:[sys.stdout.write('%s\n'%os.getpid()),x][-1],
                  [lambda x:x+1]*10,)
    res = res.get(timeout=100)
    res = map(dill.loads,res)
    print(res)