我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。

实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?


当前回答

关于@crabcrusherclamcollector的回答,在EF查询中使用这种方法时存在问题。NotSupportedException: LINQ to Entities不支持LINQ表达式节点类型“Invoke”。我将实现修改为:

public static class SystemTime
    {
        private static Func<DateTime> UtcNowFunc = () => DateTime.UtcNow;

        public static void SetDateTime(DateTime dateTimeNow)
        {
            UtcNowFunc = () => dateTimeNow;
        }

        public static void ResetDateTime()
        {
            UtcNowFunc = () => DateTime.UtcNow;
        }

        public static DateTime UtcNow
        {
            get
            {
                DateTime now = UtcNowFunc.Invoke();
                return now;
            }
        }
    }

其他回答

这些都是很好的答案,这是我在另一个项目中所做的:

用法:

获取今天的真实日期时间

var today = SystemTime.Now().Date;

而不是使用DateTime。现在,你需要使用SystemTime.Now()…这并不难改变,但这种解决方案可能并不适合所有项目。

时间旅行(让我们去5年后)

SystemTime.SetDateTime(today.AddYears(5));

获得我们虚假的“今天”(从“今天”开始算起5年)

var fakeToday = SystemTime.Now().Date;

重置日期

SystemTime.ResetDateTime();

/// <summary>
/// Used for getting DateTime.Now(), time is changeable for unit testing
/// </summary>
public static class SystemTime
{
    /// <summary> Normally this is a pass-through to DateTime.Now, but it can be overridden with SetDateTime( .. ) for testing or debugging.
    /// </summary>
    public static Func<DateTime> Now = () => DateTime.Now;

    /// <summary> Set time to return when SystemTime.Now() is called.
    /// </summary>
    public static void SetDateTime(DateTime dateTimeNow)
    {
        Now = () =>  dateTimeNow;
    }

    /// <summary> Resets SystemTime.Now() to return DateTime.Now.
    /// </summary>
    public static void ResetDateTime()
    {
        Now = () => DateTime.Now;
    }
}

关于模拟DateTime有一个特别的注意事项。现在使用TypeMock…

DateTime的值。现在必须放置到一个变量中,以便正确地模拟。例如:

这行不通:

if ((DateTime.Now - message.TimeOpened.Value) > new TimeSpan(1, 0, 0))

然而,这样做:

var currentDateTime = DateTime.Now;
if ((currentDateTime - message.TimeOpened.Value) > new TimeSpan(1, 0, 0))

使用ThreadLocal<T>的线程安全SystemClock非常适合我。

ThreadLocal<T>在. net Framework v4.0及更高版本中可用。

/// <summary>
/// Provides access to system time while allowing it to be set to a fixed <see cref="DateTime"/> value.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// This class is thread safe.
/// </remarks>
public static class SystemClock
{
    private static readonly ThreadLocal<Func<DateTime>> _getTime =
        new ThreadLocal<Func<DateTime>>(() => () => DateTime.Now);

    /// <inheritdoc cref="DateTime.Today"/>
    public static DateTime Today
    {
        get { return _getTime.Value().Date; }
    }

    /// <inheritdoc cref="DateTime.Now"/>
    public static DateTime Now
    {
        get { return _getTime.Value(); }
    }

    /// <inheritdoc cref="DateTime.UtcNow"/>
    public static DateTime UtcNow
    {
        get { return _getTime.Value().ToUniversalTime(); }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Sets a fixed (deterministic) time for the current thread to return by <see cref="SystemClock"/>.
    /// </summary>
    public static void Set(DateTime time)
    {
        if (time.Kind != DateTimeKind.Local)
            time = time.ToLocalTime();

        _getTime.Value = () => time;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Resets <see cref="SystemClock"/> to return the current <see cref="DateTime.Now"/>.
    /// </summary>
    public static void Reset()
    {
        _getTime.Value = () => DateTime.Now;
    }
}

使用的例子:

[TestMethod]
public void Today()
{
    SystemClock.Set(new DateTime(2015, 4, 3));

    DateTime expectedDay = new DateTime(2015, 4, 2);
    DateTime yesterday = SystemClock.Today.AddDays(-1D);
    Assert.AreEqual(expectedDay, yesterday);

    SystemClock.Reset();
}

一种简单的方法是注入VirtualTime。它可以让你控制时间。 首先安装VirtualTime

Install-Package VirtualTime

例如,这允许在所有对DateTime的调用上使时间加快5倍。Now或UtcNow

var DateTime = DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime(5);

放慢时间(如放慢5倍)

var DateTime = DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime(0.5);

让时间静止

var DateTime = DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime(0);

回到过去还没有测试过

下面是一个测试示例:

[TestMethod]
public void it_should_make_time_move_faster()
{
    int speedOfTimePerMs = 1000;
    int timeToPassMs = 3000;
    int expectedElapsedVirtualTime = speedOfTimePerMs * timeToPassMs;
    DateTime whenTimeStarts = DateTime.Now;
    ITime time = whenTimeStarts.ToVirtualTime(speedOfTimePerMs);
    Thread.Sleep(timeToPassMs);
    DateTime expectedTime = DateTime.Now.AddMilliseconds(expectedElapsedVirtualTime - timeToPassMs);
    DateTime virtualTime = time.Now;

    Assert.IsTrue(TestHelper.AreEqualWithinMarginOfError(expectedTime, virtualTime, MarginOfErrorMs));
}

你可以在这里查看更多测试:

https://github.com/VirtualTime/VirtualTime/blob/master/VirtualTimeLib.Tests/when_virtual_time_is_used.cs

什么DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime扩展给你是一个ITime的实例,你传递给一个依赖于ITime的方法/类。一些DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime被设置在你选择的DI容器中

下面是注入类构造函数的另一个例子

public class AlarmClock
{
    private ITime DateTime;
    public AlarmClock(ITime dateTime, int numberOfHours)
    {
        DateTime = dateTime;
        SetTime = DateTime.UtcNow.AddHours(numberOfHours);
        Task.Run(() =>
        {
            while (!IsAlarmOn)
            {
                IsAlarmOn = (SetTime - DateTime.UtcNow).TotalMilliseconds < 0;
            }
        });
    }
    public DateTime SetTime { get; set; }
    public bool IsAlarmOn { get; set; }
}

[TestMethod]
public void it_can_be_injected_as_a_dependency()
{
    //virtual time has to be 1000*3.75 faster to get to an hour 
    //in 1000 ms real time
    var dateTime = DateTime.Now.ToVirtualTime(1000 * 3.75);
    var numberOfHoursBeforeAlarmSounds = 1;
    var alarmClock = new AlarmClock(dateTime, numberOfHoursBeforeAlarmSounds);
    Assert.IsFalse(alarmClock.IsAlarmOn);
    System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000);
    Assert.IsTrue(alarmClock.IsAlarmOn);
}

我很惊讶没有人提出一个最明显的方法:

public class TimeDependentClass
{
    public void TimeDependentMethod(DateTime someTime)
    {
        if (GetCurrentTime() > someTime) DoSomething();
    }

    protected virtual DateTime GetCurrentTime()
    {
        return DateTime.Now; // or UtcNow
    }
}

然后,您可以简单地在测试double中重写此方法。

在某些情况下,我还喜欢注入一个TimeProvider类,但对于其他情况,这就足够了。不过,如果需要在多个类中重用TimeProvider版本,我可能更喜欢它。

编辑:对于任何感兴趣的人来说,这被称为向类中添加“接缝”,在这个点上,您可以钩入它的行为来修改它(用于测试目的或其他),而无需实际更改类中的代码。