作为Oliver回答的一种变体，您可以将这些行包装成闭包。例如:

class Classy {

    var foo: Int! { didSet { doStuff() } }

    init( foo: Int ) {
        // closure invokes didSet
        ({ self.foo = foo })()
    }

}

编辑:Brian Westphal的回答更好。这句话的好处是暗示了他的意图。

我也有同样的问题，这个方法对我很有效

class SomeClass {
    var someProperty: AnyObject {
        didSet {
            doStuff()
        }
    }

    init(someProperty: AnyObject) {
        defer { self.someProperty = someProperty }
    }

    func doStuff() {
        // do stuff now that someProperty is set
    }
}

虽然这不是一个解决方案，但另一种方法是使用类构造函数:

class SomeClass {
    var someProperty: AnyObject {
        didSet {
            // do stuff
        }
    }

    class func createInstance(someProperty: AnyObject) -> SomeClass {
        let instance = SomeClass() 
        instance.someProperty = someProperty
        return instance
    }  
}

如果你在子类中这样做，这是可行的

class Base {

  var someProperty: AnyObject {
    didSet {
      doStuff()
    }
  }

  required init() {
    someProperty = "hello"
  }

  func doStuff() {
    print(someProperty)
  }
}

class SomeClass: Base {

  required init() {
    super.init()

    someProperty = "hello"
  }
}

let a = Base()
let b = SomeClass()

在本例中，没有触发didSet。但是在b的例子中，didSet被触发了，因为它在子类中。它必须处理初始化上下文的真正含义，在这种情况下，超类确实关心这个

创建一个自己的set-Method，并在init-Method中使用它:

class SomeClass {
    var someProperty: AnyObject! {
        didSet {
            //do some Stuff
        }
    }

    init(someProperty: AnyObject) {
        setSomeProperty(someProperty)
    }

    func setSomeProperty(newValue:AnyObject) {
        self.someProperty = newValue
    }
}

By declaring someProperty as type: AnyObject! (an implicitly unwrapped optional), you allow self to fully initialize without someProperty being set. When you call setSomeProperty(someProperty) you're calling an equivalent of self.setSomeProperty(someProperty). Normally you wouldn't be able to do this because self hasn't been fully initialized. Since someProperty doesn't require initialization and you are calling a method dependent on self, Swift leaves the initialization context and didSet will run.

作为Oliver回答的一种变体，您可以将这些行包装成闭包。例如:

class Classy {

    var foo: Int! { didSet { doStuff() } }

    init( foo: Int ) {
        // closure invokes didSet
        ({ self.foo = foo })()
    }

}

编辑:Brian Westphal的回答更好。这句话的好处是暗示了他的意图。