这里有一篇文章解释了如何在2020年做到这一点:https://www.robertcooper.me/table-row-links

这篇文章解释了3种可能的解决方案:

使用JavaScript。 用锚定元素包装所有表单元格。 使用<div>元素代替原生HTML表格元素，以使表格行为<a>元素。

本文深入讨论了如何实现每个解决方案(使用到codedependency的链接)，还考虑了一些边缘情况，例如如何处理希望在表单元格中添加链接的情况(嵌套<a>元素不是有效的HTML，因此需要解决这个问题)。

正如@gameliela所指出的，找到一种不将整行作为链接的方法也是值得的，因为这将简化许多事情。然而，我确实认为，将整个表行作为一个链接来点击是一种很好的用户体验，因为用户可以方便地单击表上的任何位置来导航到相应的页面。

我知道有人已经写了差不多一样的，但我的方式是正确的方式(div不能是A的子)，也最好使用类。

您可以使用CSS模拟一个表，并将a元素作为行

<div class="table" style="width:100%;">
  <a href="#" class="tr">
    <span class="td">
      cell 1
    </span>
    <span class="td">
      cell 2
    </span>
  </a>
</div>

css:

.table{display:table;}
.tr{display:table-row;}
.td{display:table-cell;}
.tr:hover{background-color:#ccc;}

我更喜欢使用onclick=""属性，因为它很容易使用和理解的新手喜欢

 <tr onclick="window.location='any-page.php'">
    <td>UserName</td>
    <td>Email</td>
    <td>Address</td>
</tr>

下面是一种将透明的a元素放在表行的方法。优点是:

是一个真正的链接元素:在悬停时改变指针，在状态栏中显示目标链接，可以用键盘导航，可以在新选项卡或窗口中打开，URL可以复制等 表看起来和没有添加链接时一样 表代码本身没有变化

缺点:

A元素的大小必须在脚本中设置，无论是在创建时还是在它覆盖的行大小发生任何变化之后(否则，它可以完全不使用JavaScript完成，如果表的大小也在HTML或CSS中设置，这仍然是可能的)。

该表保持不变:

<table id="tab1">
<tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>Blah Blah</td>
            <td>1234567</td>
            <td>£158,000</td>
        </tr>
</tbody>
</table>

添加链接(为每一行)通过jQuery JavaScript插入一个A元素到每个第一列，并设置所需的属性:

// v1, fixed for IE and Chrome
// v0, worked on Firefox only
// width needed for adjusting the width of the A element
var mywidth=$('#tab1').width();

$('#tab1 tbody>tr>td:nth-child(1)').each(function(index){
    $(this).css('position',  'relative');// debug: .css('background-color', '#f11');
    // insert the <A> element
    var myA=$('<A>');
    $(this).append(myA);
    var myheight=$(this).height();

    myA.css({//"border":'1px solid #2dd', border for debug only
            'display': 'block',
            'left': '0',
            'top': '0',
            'position':  'absolute'
        })
        .attr('href','the link here')
        .width(mywidth)
        .height(myheight)
        ;
    });

如果使用了许多填充和边距，宽度和高度的设置可能会很棘手，但通常情况下，几个像素的偏差应该是无关紧要的。

现场演示在这里:http://jsfiddle.net/qo0dx0oo/(工作在Firefox，但不是IE或Chrome，那里的链接定位错误)

修复了Chrome和IE(仍然适用于FF): http://jsfiddle.net/qo0dx0oo/2/

前面没有提到的一个解决方案是在一个单元格中使用单个链接，并使用一些CSS来扩展这个链接:

table { border: 1px solid; width: 400px; overflow: hidden; } tr:hover { background: gray; } tr td { border: 1px solid; } tr td:first-child { position:relative; } a:before { content: ''; position:absolute; left: 0; top: 0; bottom: 0; display: block; width: 400px; } <table> <tr> <td><a href="https://google.com">First column</a></td> <td>Second column</td> <td>Third column</td> </tr> <tr> <td><a href="https://stackoverflow.com">First column</a></td> <td>Second column</td> <td>Third column</td> </tr> </table>

我投入了很多时间来解决这个问题。

有3种方法:

Use JavaScript. The clear drawbacks: it's not possible to open a new tab natively, and when hovering over the row there will be no indication on status bar like regular links have. Accessibility is also a question. Use HTML/CSS only. This means putting <a> nested under each <td>. A simple approach like this fiddle doesn't work - Because the clickable surface is not necessarily equal for each column. This is a serious UX concern. Also, if you need a <button> on the row, it is not valid HTML to nest it under <a> tag (although browsers are ok with that). I've found 3 other ways to implement this approach. First is ok, the other two are not great. a) Have a look on this example: tr { height: 0; } td { height: 0; padding: 0; } /* A hack to overcome differences between Chrome and Firefox */ @-moz-document url-prefix() { td { height: 100%; } } a { display: block; height: 100%; } It works, but due to inconsistencies between Chrome and Firefox it requires browser-specific hack to overcome the differences. Also Chrome will always align the cell content to the top, which can cause problems with long texts, especially if varying line heights are involved. b) Setting <td> to { display: contents; }. This leads to 2 other problems: b1. If someone else tries to style directly the <td> tag, like setting it to { width: 20px; }, we need to pass that style somehow to the <a> tag. We need some magic to do that, probably more magic than in the Javascript alternative. b2. { display: contents; } is still experimental; specifically it's not supported on Edge. c) Setting <td> to { height: --some-fixed-value; }. This is just not flexible enough. The last approach, which I recommend to seriously thinking of, is to not using clickable rows at all. Clickable rows is not a great UX experience: it's not easy to visually mark them as clickable, and it poses challenges when multiple parts are clickable within the rows, like buttons. So a viable alternative could be to have an <a> tag only on the first column, displayed as a regular link, and give it the role of navigating the whole row.