我用的是RC2

使用URL路由:

routes.MapRoute(
    "Error",
     "{*url}",
     new { controller = "Errors", action = "NotFound" }  // 404s
);

上面似乎照顾到这样的请求(假设默认路由表由最初的MVC项目设置):"/blah/blah/blah/blah"

重写控制器本身的HandleUnknownAction():

// 404s - handle here (bad action requested
protected override void HandleUnknownAction(string actionName) {
    ViewData["actionName"] = actionName;
    View("NotFound").ExecuteResult(this.ControllerContext);
}  

但是,前面的策略不处理对坏/未知控制器的请求。例如,我没有“/IDoNotExist”,如果我请求这个,我从web服务器得到通用404页面,而不是我的404,如果我使用路由+覆盖。

最后,我的问题是:有没有办法在MVC框架中使用路由或其他东西来捕获这种类型的请求?

或者我应该默认使用Web。配置customErrors作为我的404处理程序,忘记这一切?我假设如果我使用customErrors,由于Web的原因,我将不得不在/Views之外存储通用404页面。配置直接访问限制。


当前回答

我能让@cottsak的方法为无效控制器工作的唯一方法是修改CustomControllerFactory中现有的路由请求,如下所示:

public class CustomControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
    protected override IController GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
    {
        try
        {
            if (controllerType == null)
                return base.GetControllerInstance(requestContext, controllerType); 
            else
                return ObjectFactory.GetInstance(controllerType) as Controller;
        }
        catch (HttpException ex)
        {
            if (ex.GetHttpCode() == (int)HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
            {
                requestContext.RouteData.Values["controller"] = "Error";
                requestContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = "Http404";
                requestContext.RouteData.Values.Add("url", requestContext.HttpContext.Request.Url.OriginalString);

                return ObjectFactory.GetInstance<ErrorController>();
            }
            else
                throw ex;
        }
    }
}

我应该提到我使用的是MVC 2.0。

其他回答

因为我的评论太长了,所以发表了一个答案…

这既是对独角兽帖子/答案的评论,也是对它的问题:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/7499406/687549

比起其他答案,我更喜欢这个答案,因为它很简单,而且事实是,显然微软的一些人被咨询了。然而,我有三个问题,如果他们可以回答,那么我将把这个答案称为互联网上所有404/500个错误答案的圣杯。NET MVC (x)应用程序。

@Pure。Krome

Can you update your answer with the SEO stuff from the comments pointed out by GWB (there was never any mentioning of this in your answer) - <customErrors mode="On" redirectMode="ResponseRewrite"> and <httpErrors errorMode="Custom" existingResponse="Replace">? Can you ask your ASP.NET team friends if it is okay to do it like that - would be nice to have some confirmation - maybe it's a big no-no to change redirectMode and existingResponse in this way to be able to play nicely with SEO?! Can you add some clarification surrounding all that stuff (customErrors redirectMode="ResponseRewrite", customErrors redirectMode="ResponseRedirect", httpErrors errorMode="Custom" existingResponse="Replace", REMOVE customErrors COMPLETELY as someone suggested) after talking to your friends at Microsoft?

就像我说的;如果我们能让你的回答更完整就太好了,因为这似乎是一个相当受欢迎的问题,有54000 +的浏览量。

更新:Unicorn的答案是302 Found和200 OK,不能使用路由更改为只返回404。它必须是一个物理文件,不是很MVC:ish。我们来看另一个解。太糟糕了,因为这似乎是到目前为止的终极MVC:ish答案。

我真的很喜欢cottsaks的解决方案,认为它解释得非常清楚。我唯一增加的是修改步骤2如下

public abstract class MyController : Controller
{

    #region Http404 handling

    protected override void HandleUnknownAction(string actionName)
    {
        //if controller is ErrorController dont 'nest' exceptions
        if(this.GetType() != typeof(ErrorController))
        this.InvokeHttp404(HttpContext);
    }

    public ActionResult InvokeHttp404(HttpContextBase httpContext)
    {
        IController errorController = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<ErrorController>();
        var errorRoute = new RouteData();
        errorRoute.Values.Add("controller", "Error");
        errorRoute.Values.Add("action", "Http404");
        errorRoute.Values.Add("url", httpContext.Request.Url.OriginalString);
        errorController.Execute(new RequestContext(
             httpContext, errorRoute));

        return new EmptyResult();
    }

    #endregion
}

基本上,这将阻止包含无效动作和控制器的url两次触发异常例程。Eg的url,如asdfsdf/dfgdfgd

ASP。NET MVC不太支持自定义404页面。自定义控制器工厂,捕获所有路由,带有HandleUnknownAction的基控制器类-啊!

到目前为止,IIS自定义错误页面是更好的选择:

. config

<system.webServer>
  <httpErrors errorMode="Custom" existingResponse="Replace">
    <remove statusCode="404" />
    <error statusCode="404" responseMode="ExecuteURL" path="/Error/PageNotFound" />
  </httpErrors>
</system.webServer>

ErrorController

public class ErrorController : Controller
{
    public ActionResult PageNotFound()
    {
        Response.StatusCode = 404;
        return View();
    }
}

示例项目

GitHub上的Test404 生活的网站

我浏览了所有的文章,但没有一篇对我有用: 我的要求用户键入任何在您的url自定义404页面应该显示。我认为它非常直截了当。但是你应该正确理解404的处理:

 <system.web>
    <customErrors mode="On" redirectMode="ResponseRewrite">
      <error statusCode="404" redirect="~/PageNotFound.aspx"/>
    </customErrors>
  </system.web>
<system.webServer>
    <httpErrors errorMode="Custom">
      <remove statusCode="404"/>
      <error statusCode="404" path="/PageNotFound.html" responseMode="ExecuteURL"/>
    </httpErrors>
</system.webServer>

我发现这篇文章很有帮助。应该马上读。自定义错误页面- ben Foster

404要求

以下是我对404解决方案的要求,下面我展示了我如何实现它:

I want to handle matched routes with bad actions I want to handle matched routes with bad controllers I want to handle un-matched routes (arbitrary urls that my app can't understand) - i don't want these bubbling up to the Global.asax or IIS because then i can't redirect back into my MVC app properly I want a way to handle in the same manner as above, custom 404s - like when an ID is submitted for an object that does not exist (maybe deleted) I want all my 404s to return an MVC view (not a static page) to which i can pump more data later if necessary (good 404 designs) and they must return the HTTP 404 status code

解决方案

我认为你应该在全局中保存Application_Error。asax用于高级的事情,如未处理的异常和日志记录(如Shay Jacoby的回答所示),但不用于404处理。这就是为什么我的建议将404内容排除在全局中。asax文件。

步骤1:为404错误逻辑设置一个公共位置

这对于可维护性来说是个好主意。使用ErrorController,以便将来对精心设计的404页面的改进可以很容易地适应。此外,确保您的响应有404代码!

public class ErrorController : MyController
{
    #region Http404

    public ActionResult Http404(string url)
    {
        Response.StatusCode = (int)HttpStatusCode.NotFound;
        var model = new NotFoundViewModel();
        // If the url is relative ('NotFound' route) then replace with Requested path
        model.RequestedUrl = Request.Url.OriginalString.Contains(url) & Request.Url.OriginalString != url ?
            Request.Url.OriginalString : url;
        // Dont get the user stuck in a 'retry loop' by
        // allowing the Referrer to be the same as the Request
        model.ReferrerUrl = Request.UrlReferrer != null &&
            Request.UrlReferrer.OriginalString != model.RequestedUrl ?
            Request.UrlReferrer.OriginalString : null;

        // TODO: insert ILogger here

        return View("NotFound", model);
    }
    public class NotFoundViewModel
    {
        public string RequestedUrl { get; set; }
        public string ReferrerUrl { get; set; }
    }

    #endregion
}

步骤2:使用一个基本的Controller类,这样就可以轻松地调用自定义404动作并连接HandleUnknownAction

404在ASP。NET MVC需要在许多地方被捕获。第一个是HandleUnknownAction。

InvokeHttp404方法为重新路由到ErrorController和新的Http404动作创建了一个公共位置。想干!

public abstract class MyController : Controller
{
    #region Http404 handling

    protected override void HandleUnknownAction(string actionName)
    {
        // If controller is ErrorController dont 'nest' exceptions
        if (this.GetType() != typeof(ErrorController))
            this.InvokeHttp404(HttpContext);
    }

    public ActionResult InvokeHttp404(HttpContextBase httpContext)
    {
        IController errorController = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<ErrorController>();
        var errorRoute = new RouteData();
        errorRoute.Values.Add("controller", "Error");
        errorRoute.Values.Add("action", "Http404");
        errorRoute.Values.Add("url", httpContext.Request.Url.OriginalString);
        errorController.Execute(new RequestContext(
             httpContext, errorRoute));

        return new EmptyResult();
    }

    #endregion
}

步骤3:在控制器工厂中使用依赖注入并连接404 httpexception

就像这样(它不一定是StructureMap):

MVC1.0例子:

public class StructureMapControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
    protected override IController GetControllerInstance(Type controllerType)
    {
        try
        {
            if (controllerType == null)
                return base.GetControllerInstance(controllerType);
        }
        catch (HttpException ex)
        {
            if (ex.GetHttpCode() == (int)HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
            {
                IController errorController = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<ErrorController>();
                ((ErrorController)errorController).InvokeHttp404(RequestContext.HttpContext);

                return errorController;
            }
            else
                throw ex;
        }

        return ObjectFactory.GetInstance(controllerType) as Controller;
    }
}

MVC2.0例子:

    protected override IController GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
    {
        try
        {
            if (controllerType == null)
                return base.GetControllerInstance(requestContext, controllerType);
        }
        catch (HttpException ex)
        {
            if (ex.GetHttpCode() == 404)
            {
                IController errorController = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<ErrorController>();
                ((ErrorController)errorController).InvokeHttp404(requestContext.HttpContext);

                return errorController;
            }
            else
                throw ex;
        }

        return ObjectFactory.GetInstance(controllerType) as Controller;
    }

我认为最好是在错误产生的地方捕捉错误。这就是为什么我更喜欢上面的Application_Error处理程序。

这是第二个接404的地方。

步骤4:添加一个NotFound路由到全局。Asax用于无法解析到应用程序中的url

这个路由应该指向Http404操作。注意url参数将是一个相对url,因为路由引擎在这里剥离域部分?这就是为什么我们在步骤1中有所有的条件url逻辑。

        routes.MapRoute("NotFound", "{*url}", 
            new { controller = "Error", action = "Http404" });

这是在MVC应用程序中捕获不是自己调用的404的第三个也是最后一个地方。如果你在这里没有捕捉到不匹配的路由,那么MVC就会把这个问题传递给ASP。NET (global。asax)在这种情况下你不希望那样。

第五步:最后,当你的应用找不到东西时调用404

就像当一个坏的ID提交给我的贷款控制器(来源于MyController):

    //
    // GET: /Detail/ID

    public ActionResult Detail(int ID)
    {
        Loan loan = this._svc.GetLoans().WithID(ID);
        if (loan == null)
            return this.InvokeHttp404(HttpContext);
        else
            return View(loan);
    }

如果所有这些都能在更少的地方用更少的代码连接起来,那就太好了,但我认为这种解决方案更可维护,更可测试,而且相当实用。

谢谢你的反馈。我想要更多。

注:这已经从我原来的答案编辑显著,但目的/要求是相同的-这就是为什么我没有添加一个新的答案