var arr = [{x:1}, {x:2}, {x:3}];
arr.map(function(a) {return a.x;})
.reduce(function(a, b) {return a + b});
console.log(arr);
//I tried using the following code and the result is the data array
//result = [{x:1}, {x:2}, {x:3}];
var arr2 = [{x:1}, {x:2}, {x:3}]
.reduce((total, thing) => total + thing.x, 0);
console.log(arr2);
// and I changed the code to like this and it worked.
// result = 6

你不应该使用a.x作为累加器，相反，你可以这样做 ' arr = [{x:1}，{x:2}，{x:4}]

Arr.reduce(函数(a,b){a + b.x}，0) '

我在ES6中做了一点改进:

arr.reduce((a, b) => ({x: a.x + b.x})).x

返回数

Reduce函数在集合上迭代

arr = [{x:1},{x:2},{x:4}] // is a collection

arr.reduce(function(a,b){return a.x + b.x})

翻译:

arr.reduce(
    //for each index in the collection, this callback function is called
  function (
    a, //a = accumulator ,during each callback , value of accumulator is 
         passed inside the variable "a"
    b, //currentValue , for ex currentValue is {x:1} in 1st callback
    currentIndex,
    array
  ) {
    return a.x + b.x; 
  },
  accumulator // this is returned at the end of arr.reduce call 
    //accumulator = returned value i.e return a.x + b.x  in each callback. 
);

在每次索引回调期间，变量accumulator的值为 在回调函数中传入"a"参数。如果不初始化"accumulator"，它的值将是undefined。调用定义。X会给出误差。 要解决这个问题，初始化“accumulator”，值为0，如Casey的答案所示。

为了理解“reduce”函数的输入输出，我建议您查看该函数的源代码。 Lodash库有reduce函数，它的工作原理与ES6中的“reduce”函数完全相同。

以下是链接: 减少源代码

在reduce的每一步中，你不会返回一个新的{x:??}对象。所以你要么需要做:

arr = [{x:1},{x:2},{x:4}]
arr.reduce(function(a,b){return a + b.x})

或者你需要这样做

arr = [{x:1},{x:2},{x:4}]
arr.reduce(function(a,b){return {x: a.x + b.x}; }) 

//fill创建包含n元素的数组 //reduce需要2个参数，第3个参数作为长度 var fibonacci = (n) =>数组(n).fill()。Reduce ((a, b, c) => { 返回a.concat(c < 2 ?C: a[C - 1] + a[C - 2]) },[]) console.log(斐波纳契(8))