在Bash中,测试数组是否包含某个值的最简单方法是什么?
当前回答
借鉴Dennis Williamson的答案,下面的解决方案结合了数组、shell-safe引号和正则表达式,以避免需要:遍历循环;使用管道或其他子过程;或者使用非bash实用程序。
declare -a array=('hello, stack' one 'two words' words last)
printf -v array_str -- ',,%q' "${array[@]}"
if [[ "${array_str},," =~ ,,words,, ]]
then
echo 'Matches'
else
echo "Doesn't match"
fi
上面的代码通过使用Bash正则表达式来匹配数组内容的字符串化版本。有六个重要的步骤来确保正则表达式匹配不会被数组中的值的巧妙组合所欺骗:
Construct the comparison string by using Bash's built-in printf shell-quoting, %q. Shell-quoting will ensure that special characters become "shell-safe" by being escaped with backslash \. Choose a special character to serve as a value delimiter. The delimiter HAS to be one of the special characters that will become escaped when using %q; that's the only way to guarantee that values within the array can't be constructed in clever ways to fool the regular expression match. I choose comma , because that character is the safest when eval'd or misused in an otherwise unexpected way. Combine all array elements into a single string, using two instances of the special character to serve as delimiter. Using comma as an example, I used ,,%q as the argument to printf. This is important because two instances of the special character can only appear next to each other when they appear as the delimiter; all other instances of the special character will be escaped. Append two trailing instances of the delimiter to the string, to allow matches against the last element of the array. Thus, instead of comparing against ${array_str}, compare against ${array_str},,. If the target string you're searching for is supplied by a user variable, you must escape all instances of the special character with a backslash. Otherwise, the regular expression match becomes vulnerable to being fooled by cleverly-crafted array elements. Perform a Bash regular expression match against the string.
其他回答
这是一个小小的贡献:
array=(word "two words" words)
search_string="two"
match=$(echo "${array[@]:0}" | grep -o $search_string)
[[ ! -z $match ]] && echo "found !"
注意:这种方法不区分大小写“两个单词”,但在问题中不需要这样做。
使用grep和printf
在新行上格式化每个数组成员,然后grep这些行。
if printf '%s\n' "${array[@]}" | grep -x -q "search string"; then echo true; else echo false; fi
example:
$ array=("word", "two words")
$ if printf '%s\n' "${array[@]}" | grep -x -q "two words"; then echo true; else echo false; fi
true
注意,这对delimeter和空格没有问题。
结合这里介绍的一些想法,您可以创建一个没有循环的优雅if语句,它可以精确地进行单词匹配。
find="myword"
array=(value1 value2 myword)
if [[ ! -z $(printf '%s\n' "${array[@]}" | grep -w $find) ]]; then
echo "Array contains myword";
fi
这将不会触发一个单词或val,只有整个单词匹配。如果每个数组值包含多个单词,则会中断。
结合Beorn Harris和loentar的回答,我们得出了一个更有趣的单行测试:
delim=$'\x1F' # define a control code to be used as more or less reliable delimiter
if [[ "${delim}${array[@]}${delim}" =~ "${delim}a string to test${delim}" ]]; then
echo "contains 'a string to test'"
fi
它不使用额外的函数,不替换测试,并添加了额外的保护,防止使用控制代码作为分隔符偶尔出现错误匹配。
UPD:感谢@ChrisCogdon的注意,这个错误的代码被重写并以https://stackoverflow.com/a/58527681/972463的形式发布。
OP自己添加了以下答案,并附上了评论:
在回答和评论的帮助下,经过一些测试,我得出了这个结论:
function contains() {
local n=$#
local value=${!n}
for ((i=1;i < $#;i++)) {
if [ "${!i}" == "${value}" ]; then
echo "y"
return 0
fi
}
echo "n"
return 1
}
A=("one" "two" "three four")
if [ $(contains "${A[@]}" "one") == "y" ]; then
echo "contains one"
fi
if [ $(contains "${A[@]}" "three") == "y" ]; then
echo "contains three"
fi