Object的另一种可能用法。Create是用一种廉价而有效的方式克隆不可变对象。

var anObj = {
    a: "test",
    b: "jest"
};

var bObj = Object.create(anObj);

bObj.b = "gone"; // replace an existing (by masking prototype)
bObj.c = "brand"; // add a new to demonstrate it is actually a new obj

// now bObj is {a: test, b: gone, c: brand}

Notes: The above snippet creates a clone of an source object (aka not a reference, as in cObj = aObj). It benefits over the copy-properties method (see 1), in that it does not copy object member properties. Rather it creates another -destination- object with it's prototype set on the source object. Moreover when properties are modified on the dest object, they are created "on the fly", masking the prototype's (src's) properties.This constitutes a fast an effective way of cloning immutable objects.

这里需要注意的是，这适用于创建后不应该修改的源对象(不可变)。如果源对象在创建后被修改，克隆的所有未屏蔽属性也将被修改。

这里(http://jsfiddle.net/y5b5q/1/)(需要对象。创建功能强大的浏览器)。

简介:

object. create()是一个Javascript函数，它接受2个参数并返回一个新对象。 第一个参数是一个对象，它将是新创建对象的原型 第二个参数是一个对象，它将是新创建对象的属性

例子:

Const proto = { Talk: () => console.log('hi') ｝ Const props = { 年龄:{ 可写:没错, 可配置:没错, 价值:26 ｝ ｝ let Person = Object。创建(原型、道具) console.log (Person.age); Person.talk ();

实际应用:

The main advantage of creating an object in this manner is that the prototype can be explicitly defined. When using an object literal, or the new keyword you have no control over this (however, you can overwrite them of course). If we want to have a prototype The new keyword invokes a constructor function. With Object.create() there is no need for invoking or even declaring a constructor function. It can Basically be a helpful tool when you want create objects in a very dynamic manner. We can make an object factory function which creates objects with different prototypes depending on the arguments received.

由于只有一个继承级别，您的示例可能不会让您看到Object.create的真正好处。

该方法允许您轻松实现差异继承，其中对象可以直接从其他对象继承。

在你的userB的例子中，我不认为你的init方法应该是公共的，甚至不存在，如果你在一个现有的对象实例上再次调用这个方法，id和name属性将会改变。

对象。Create允许你使用它的第二个参数初始化对象属性，例如:

var userB = {
  sayHello: function() {
    console.log('Hello '+ this.name);
  }
};

var bob = Object.create(userB, {
  'id' : {
    value: MY_GLOBAL.nextId(),
    enumerable:true // writable:false, configurable(deletable):false by default
  },
  'name': {
    value: 'Bob',
    enumerable: true
  }
});

如您所见，属性可以在Object的第二个参数上初始化。使用类似于object . defineproperties和object . defineproperty方法使用的语法创建一个对象文字。

它允许您设置属性属性(可枚举、可写或可配置)，这非常有用。

你必须创建一个自定义的Object.create()函数。它解决了Crockfords的问题，也调用了init函数。

这是可行的:

var userBPrototype = {
    init: function(nameParam) {
        this.name = nameParam;
    },
    sayHello: function() {
        console.log('Hello '+ this.name);
    }
};


function UserB(name) {
    function F() {};
    F.prototype = userBPrototype;
    var f = new F;
    f.init(name);
    return f;
}

var bob = UserB('bob');
bob.sayHello();

这里UserB类似于Object。创造，但要适应我们的需要。

如果你愿意，也可以拨打:

var bob = new UserB('bob');

我认为问题的重点是理解new和Object之间的区别。创建方法。根据这个答案和这个视频，new关键字做了下面的事情:

创建新对象。 将新对象链接到构造函数(原型)。 使此变量指向新对象。 使用new对象执行构造函数，隐式执行返回this; 将构造函数函数名赋给新对象的属性构造函数。

对象。Create只执行第1和第2步!

在代码示例中提供的问题，这不是什么大问题，但在下一个例子中，它是:

var onlineUsers = [];
function SiteMember(name) {
    this.name = name;
    onlineUsers.push(name);
}
SiteMember.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
}
function Guest(name) {
    SiteMember.call(this, name);
}
Guest.prototype = new SiteMember();

var g = new Guest('James');
console.log(onlineUsers);

作为副作用的结果将是:

[ undefined, 'James' ]

因为盖斯特。prototype = new SiteMember(); 但是我们不需要执行父构造函数方法，我们只需要使方法getName在Guest中可用。 因此我们必须使用Object.create。 如果替换Guest。prototype = new SiteMember(); 来的客人。prototype = Object.create(sitember .prototype);结果是:

[ 'James' ]

new and Object.create serve different purposes. new is intended to create a new instance of an object type. Object.create is intended to simply create a new object and set its prototype. Why is this useful? To implement inheritance without accessing the __proto__ property. An object instance's prototype referred to as [[Prototype]] is an internal property of the virtual machine and is not intended to be directly accessed. The only reason it is actually possible to directly access [[Prototype]] as the __proto__ property is because it has always been a de-facto standard of every major virtual machine's implementation of ECMAScript, and at this point removing it would break a lot of existing code.

对于7ochem上面的回答，对象绝对不应该将它们的原型设置为new语句的结果，不仅因为没有必要多次调用相同的原型构造函数，而且因为如果在创建原型后修改了原型，同一类的两个实例可能会以不同的行为结束。这两个例子都是由于误解和破坏了原型继承链的预期行为而导致的糟糕代码。

当使用Object创建一个实例时，应该写入实例的原型，而不是访问__proto__。创建或随后使用Object。setPrototypeOf，用Object读取。getPrototypeOf或Object.isPrototypeOf。

Also, as the Mozilla documentation of Object.setPrototypeOf points out, it is a bad idea to modify the prototype of an object after it is created for performance reasons, in addition to the fact that modifying an object's prototype after it is created can cause undefined behavior if a given piece of code that accesses it can be executed before OR after the prototype is modified, unless that code is very careful to check the current prototype or not access any property that differs between the two.

Given const X = function (v) { this.v = v }; X.prototype.whatAmI = 'X'; X.prototype.getWhatIAm = () => this.whatAmI; X.prototype.getV = () => this.v; the following VM pseudo-code is equivalent to the statement const x0 = new X(1);: const x0 = {}; x0.[[Prototype]] = X.prototype; X.prototype.constructor.call(x0, 1); Note although the constructor can return any value, the new statement always ignores its return value and returns a reference to the newly created object. And the following pseudo-code is equivalent to the statement const x1 = Object.create(X.prototype);: const x0 = {}; x0.[[Prototype]] = X.prototype; As you can see, the only difference between the two is that Object.create does not execute the constructor, which can actually return any value but simply returns the new object reference this if not otherwise specified.

Now, if we wanted to create a subclass Y with the following definition: const Y = function(u) { this.u = u; } Y.prototype.whatAmI = 'Y'; Y.prototype.getU = () => this.u; Then we can make it inherit from X like this by writing to __proto__: Y.prototype.__proto__ = X.prototype; While the same thing could be accomplished without ever writing to __proto__ with: Y.prototype = Object.create(X.prototype); Y.prototype.constructor = Y; In the latter case, it is necessary to set the constructor property of the prototype so that the correct constructor is called by the new Y statement, otherwise new Y will call the function X. If the programmer does want new Y to call X, it would be more properly done in Y's constructor with X.call(this, u)