我有一个循环,开头为for I,范围为(0,100)。正常情况下,它可以正常运行,但有时由于网络条件而出现故障。目前,我已经设置它,以便在失败时,它将继续在except子句中(继续到I的下一个数字)。
我是否可以将相同的数字重新分配给i,并再次运行失败的循环迭代?
我有一个循环,开头为for I,范围为(0,100)。正常情况下,它可以正常运行,但有时由于网络条件而出现故障。目前,我已经设置它,以便在失败时,它将继续在except子句中(继续到I的下一个数字)。
我是否可以将相同的数字重新分配给i,并再次运行失败的循环迭代?
当前回答
如果您正在寻找的是重新尝试x次失败的尝试,那么单个for else循环可能就是您想要的。考虑这个例子,尝试了3次:
attempts = 3
for attempt in range(1, attempts+1):
try:
if attempt < 4:
raise TypeError(f"Error raised on attempt: {attempt}")
else:
print(f'Attempt {attempt} finally worked.')
except (TypeError) as error:
print(f'Attempt {attempt} hit the exception.')
continue
else:
break
else:
print(f'Exit after final attempt: {attempt}')
print(f'\nGo on to execute other code ...')
给出输出:
Attempt 1 hit the exception.
Attempt 2 hit the exception.
Attempt 3 hit the exception.
Exit after final attempt: 3
Go on to execute other code ...
再试一次它就成功了
attempts = 4
给出输出:
Attempt 1 hit the exception.
Attempt 2 hit the exception.
Attempt 3 hit the exception.
Attempt 4 finally worked.
Go on to execute other code ...
其他回答
for _ in range(5):
try:
# replace this with something that may fail
raise ValueError("foo")
# replace Exception with a more specific exception
except Exception as e:
err = e
continue
# no exception, continue remainder of code
else:
break
# did not break the for loop, therefore all attempts
# raised an exception
else:
raise err
我的版本与上面的几个类似,但没有使用单独的while循环,如果所有重试都失败,则重新引发最新的异常。可以显式地在顶部设置err = None,但不是严格必要的,因为它只应该在出现错误时执行最后一个else块,因此设置了err。
重新尝试的替代方案:坚韧和退缩(2020年更新)
重新尝试库是以前的方法,但遗憾的是,它有一些bug,自2016年以来就没有任何更新。其他的选择似乎是后退和坚韧。在写这篇文章的时候,tenacity有更多的GItHub星(2.3k vs 1.2k),并且最近更新了,因此我选择使用它。这里有一个例子:
from functools import partial
import random # producing random errors for this example
from tenacity import retry, stop_after_delay, wait_fixed, retry_if_exception_type
# Custom error type for this example
class CommunicationError(Exception):
pass
# Define shorthand decorator for the used settings.
retry_on_communication_error = partial(
retry,
stop=stop_after_delay(10), # max. 10 seconds wait.
wait=wait_fixed(0.4), # wait 400ms
retry=retry_if_exception_type(CommunicationError),
)()
@retry_on_communication_error
def do_something_unreliable(i):
if random.randint(1, 5) == 3:
print('Run#', i, 'Error occured. Retrying.')
raise CommunicationError()
for i in range(100):
do_something_unreliable(i)
上面的代码输出如下:
Run# 3 Error occured. Retrying.
Run# 5 Error occured. Retrying.
Run# 6 Error occured. Retrying.
Run# 6 Error occured. Retrying.
Run# 10 Error occured. Retrying.
.
.
.
坚韧的更多设置。坚韧GitHub页面上列出了重试。
不使用那些丑陋的while循环的更“功能性”的方法:
def tryAgain(retries=0):
if retries > 10: return
try:
# Do stuff
except:
retries+=1
tryAgain(retries)
tryAgain()
使用递归
for i in range(100):
def do():
try:
## Network related scripts
except SpecificException as ex:
do()
do() ## invoke do() whenever required inside this loop
以下是我对这个问题的看法。下面的重试功能支持以下特性:
当调用成功时返回被调用函数的值 如果尝试失败,则引发被调用函数的异常 尝试次数限制(0表示无限) 在尝试之间等待(线性或指数) 仅当异常是特定异常类型的实例时重试。 可选的尝试记录
import time
def retry(func, ex_type=Exception, limit=0, wait_ms=100, wait_increase_ratio=2, logger=None):
attempt = 1
while True:
try:
return func()
except Exception as ex:
if not isinstance(ex, ex_type):
raise ex
if 0 < limit <= attempt:
if logger:
logger.warning("no more attempts")
raise ex
if logger:
logger.error("failed execution attempt #%d", attempt, exc_info=ex)
attempt += 1
if logger:
logger.info("waiting %d ms before attempt #%d", wait_ms, attempt)
time.sleep(wait_ms / 1000)
wait_ms *= wait_increase_ratio
用法:
def fail_randomly():
y = random.randint(0, 10)
if y < 10:
y = 0
return x / y
logger = logging.getLogger()
logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
logger.addHandler(logging.StreamHandler(stream=sys.stdout))
logger.info("starting")
result = retry.retry(fail_randomly, ex_type=ZeroDivisionError, limit=20, logger=logger)
logger.info("result is: %s", result)
更多信息请看我的帖子。