在https://code.google.com/apis/console网站上，我已经注册了我的应用程序，设置生成的客户端ID:和客户端秘密到我的应用程序，并尝试登录谷歌。
不幸的是，我收到了错误信息:
Error: redirect_uri_mismatch
The redirect URI in the request: http://127.0.0.1:3000/auth/google_oauth2/callback did not match a registered redirect URI
scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email
response_type=code
redirect_uri=http://127.0.0.1:3000/auth/google_oauth2/callback
access_type=offline
approval_prompt=force
client_id=generated_id
这条信息是什么意思，我该如何修复它?
我使用宝石omniauth-google-oauth2。
在任何在客户端检索授权代码的流中，例如GoogleAuth.grantOfflineAccess() API，现在您希望将代码传递到服务器，赎回它，并存储访问和刷新令牌，那么您必须使用文字字符串postmessage而不是redirect_uri。
例如，基于Ruby文档中的代码片段:
client_secrets = Google::APIClient::ClientSecrets.load('client_secrets.json')
auth_client = client_secrets.to_authorization
auth_client.update!(
:scope => 'profile https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.metadata.readonly',
:redirect_uri => 'postmessage' # <---- HERE
)
# Inject user's auth_code here:
auth_client.code = "4/lRCuOXzLMIzqrG4XU9RmWw8k1n3jvUgsI790Hk1s3FI"
tokens = auth_client.fetch_access_token!
# { "access_token"=>..., "expires_in"=>3587, "id_token"=>..., "refresh_token"=>..., "token_type"=>"Bearer"}
唯一提到postmessage的谷歌文档是这个老谷歌+登录文档。下面是一个截图和存档链接，因为G+即将关闭，这个链接可能会消失:
离线访问的文档页没有提到这一点是绝对不可原谅的。# FacePalm指
Let me complete @Bazyl's answer: in the message I received, they mentioned the URI
"http://localhost:8080/"
(which of course, seems an internal google configuration). I changed the authorized URI for that one,
"http://localhost:8080/" , and the message didn't appear anymore... And the video got uploaded... The APIS documentation is VERY lame... Every time I have something working with google apis, I simply feel "lucky", but there's a lack of good documentation about it.... :( Yes, I got it working, but I don't yet understand neither why it failed, nor why it worked... There was only ONE place to confirm the URI in the web, and it got copied in the client_secrets.json... I don't get if there's a THIRD place where one should write the same URI... I find nor only the documentation but also the GUI design of Google's api quite lame...
