我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
当前回答
您可以简单地使用扩展属性来复制没有引用的对象。但是要小心(请参见注释),“副本”仅位于最低的对象/数组级别。嵌套的财产仍然是引用!
完整克隆:
let x = {a: 'value1'}
let x2 = {...x}
// => mutate without references:
x2.a = 'value2'
console.log(x.a) // => 'value1'
在第二级克隆引用:
const y = {a: {b: 'value3'}}
const y2 = {...y}
// => nested object is still a references:
y2.a.b = 'value4'
console.log(y.a.b) // => 'value4'
JavaScript实际上不支持本地深度克隆。使用效用函数。例如Ramda:
http://ramdajs.com/docs/#clone
其他回答
这是对A.Levy代码的修改,以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着,如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用,则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题,如果不加以处理,就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O(n)
function clone(obj){
var clonedObjectsArray = [];
var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
var next_objid = 0;
function objectId(obj) {
if (obj == null) return null;
if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
}
return obj.__obj_id;
}
function cloneRecursive(obj) {
if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;
// Handle Date
if (obj instanceof Date) {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
return copy;
}
// Handle Array
if (obj instanceof Array) {
var copy = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
}
return copy;
}
// Handle Object
if (obj instanceof Object) {
if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];
var copy;
if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
else
copy = {};
clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;
for (var attr in obj)
if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);
return copy;
}
throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}
var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);
//remove the unique ids
for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
{
delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
};
return cloneObj;
}
一些快速测试
var auxobj = {
prop1 : "prop1 aux val",
prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
};
var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;
obj.f1 = function (){
this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};
objclone = clone(obj);
//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));
objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));
objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));
结构化克隆
2022年更新:structuredClone()全局函数已在Node 17、Deno 1.14和大多数主要浏览器中可用(请参阅我可以使用)。
您可以使用与HTML标准相同的结构化克隆机制在领域之间发送数据。
const clone = structuredClone(original);
有关详细信息,请参阅另一个答案。
function clone(obj) {
if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object')
return obj;
var temp = new obj.constructor();
for(var key in obj)
temp[key] = clone(obj[key]);
return temp;
}
我已经编写了自己的实现。不确定它是否算作更好的解决方案:
/*
a function for deep cloning objects that contains other nested objects and circular structures.
objects are stored in a 3D array, according to their length (number of properties) and their depth in the original object.
index (z)
|
|
|
|
|
| depth (x)
|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/_/_/_/_/_/_/...../
/................./
/..... /
/ /
/------------------
object length (y) /
*/
实施情况如下:
function deepClone(obj) {
var depth = -1;
var arr = [];
return clone(obj, arr, depth);
}
/**
*
* @param obj source object
* @param arr 3D array to store the references to objects
* @param depth depth of the current object relative to the passed 'obj'
* @returns {*}
*/
function clone(obj, arr, depth){
if (typeof obj !== "object") {
return obj;
}
var length = Object.keys(obj).length; // native method to get the number of properties in 'obj'
var result = Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)); // inherit the prototype of the original object
if(result instanceof Array){
result.length = length;
}
depth++; // depth is increased because we entered an object here
arr[depth] = []; // this is the x-axis, each index here is the depth
arr[depth][length] = []; // this is the y-axis, each index is the length of the object (aka number of props)
// start the depth at current and go down, cyclic structures won't form on depths more than the current one
for(var x = depth; x >= 0; x--){
// loop only if the array at this depth and length already have elements
if(arr[x][length]){
for(var index = 0; index < arr[x][length].length; index++){
if(obj === arr[x][length][index]){
return obj;
}
}
}
}
arr[depth][length].push(obj); // store the object in the array at the current depth and length
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) result[prop] = clone(obj[prop], arr, depth);
}
return result;
}
我已经在标量对象的情况下尝试过这一点,它对我很有用:
function binder(i) {
return function () {
return i;
};
}
a=1;
b=binder(a)(); // copy value of a into b
alert(++a); // 2
alert(b); // still 1
当做