如下所示,Javascript中的"0"为false:
>>> "0" == false
true
>>> false == "0"
true
那么下面为什么打印“哈”呢?
>>> if ("0") console.log("ha")
ha
如下所示,Javascript中的"0"为false:
>>> "0" == false
true
>>> false == "0"
true
那么下面为什么打印“哈”呢?
>>> if ("0") console.log("ha")
ha
当前回答
这都是因为ECMA规格…"0" == false,因为这里指定的规则http://ecma262-5.com/ELS5_HTML.htm#Section_11.9.3…if('0')的结果为true,因为这里指定的规则http://ecma262-5.com/ELS5_HTML.htm#Section_12.5
其他回答
在JS中,“==”符号不检查变量的类型。因此,“0”= 0 = false(在JS中为0 = false),在这种情况下将返回true,但如果使用“===”,结果将为false。
当你使用"if"时,在以下情况下它将是"false":
[0, false, '', null, undefined, NaN] // null = undefined, 0 = false
So
if("0") = if( ("0" !== 0) && ("0" !== false) && ("0" !== "") && ("0" !== null) && ("0" !== undefined) && ("0" !== NaN) )
= if(true && true && true && true && true && true)
= if(true)
这是因为JavaScript在布尔上下文和代码中使用类型强制
if ("0")
将在布尔上下文中被强制为true。
在Javascript中还有其他的真值,在布尔上下文中会被强制为真,因此执行if块:-
if (true)
if ({})
if ([])
if (42)
if ("0")
if ("false")
if (new Date())
if (-42)
if (12n)
if (3.14)
if (-3.14)
if (Infinity)
if (-Infinity)
// I usually do this:
x = "0" ;
if (!!+x) console.log('I am true');
else console.log('I am false');
// Essentially converting string to integer and then boolean.
The "if" expression tests for truthiness, while the double-equal tests for type-independent equivalency. A string is always truthy, as others here have pointed out. If the double-equal were testing both of its operands for truthiness and then comparing the results, then you'd get the outcome you were intuitively assuming, i.e. ("0" == true) === true. As Doug Crockford says in his excellent JavaScript: the Good Parts, "the rules by which [== coerces the types of its operands] are complicated and unmemorable.... The lack of transitivity is alarming." It suffices to say that one of the operands is type-coerced to match the other, and that "0" ends up being interpreted as a numeric zero, which is in turn equivalent to false when coerced to boolean (or false is equivalent to zero when coerced to a number).
这就是为什么你应该尽可能使用严格相等===或严格相等!== =的原因
"100" == 100
为True,因为这只检查值,而不是数据类型
"100" === 100
检查值和数据类型