我正在写一个shell脚本,需要检查终端应用程序是否已安装。我想使用TRY/CATCH命令来做到这一点,除非有更整洁的方法。
当前回答
我已经在bash中开发了一个几乎完美无缺的try & catch实现,它允许您编写如下代码:
try
echo 'Hello'
false
echo 'This will not be displayed'
catch
echo "Error in $__EXCEPTION_SOURCE__ at line: $__EXCEPTION_LINE__!"
您甚至可以将try-catch块嵌套在它们自己内部!
try {
echo 'Hello'
try {
echo 'Nested Hello'
false
echo 'This will not execute'
} catch {
echo "Nested Caught (@ $__EXCEPTION_LINE__)"
}
false
echo 'This will not execute too'
} catch {
echo "Error in $__EXCEPTION_SOURCE__ at line: $__EXCEPTION_LINE__!"
}
代码是bash样板文件/框架的一部分。它进一步扩展了try & catch的思想,例如使用回溯和异常进行错误处理(以及其他一些不错的特性)。
下面是负责try & catch的代码:
set -o pipefail
shopt -s expand_aliases
declare -ig __oo__insideTryCatch=0
# if try-catch is nested, then set +e before so the parent handler doesn't catch us
alias try="[[ \$__oo__insideTryCatch -gt 0 ]] && set +e;
__oo__insideTryCatch+=1; ( set -e;
trap \"Exception.Capture \${LINENO}; \" ERR;"
alias catch=" ); Exception.Extract \$? || "
Exception.Capture() {
local script="${BASH_SOURCE[1]#./}"
if [[ ! -f /tmp/stored_exception_source ]]; then
echo "$script" > /tmp/stored_exception_source
fi
if [[ ! -f /tmp/stored_exception_line ]]; then
echo "$1" > /tmp/stored_exception_line
fi
return 0
}
Exception.Extract() {
if [[ $__oo__insideTryCatch -gt 1 ]]
then
set -e
fi
__oo__insideTryCatch+=-1
__EXCEPTION_CATCH__=( $(Exception.GetLastException) )
local retVal=$1
if [[ $retVal -gt 0 ]]
then
# BACKWARDS COMPATIBILE WAY:
# export __EXCEPTION_SOURCE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]}-1)]}"
# export __EXCEPTION_LINE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]}-2)]}"
export __EXCEPTION_SOURCE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[-1]}"
export __EXCEPTION_LINE__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[-2]}"
export __EXCEPTION__="${__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]:0:(${#__EXCEPTION_CATCH__[@]} - 2)}"
return 1 # so that we may continue with a "catch"
fi
}
Exception.GetLastException() {
if [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception ]] && [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception_line ]] && [[ -f /tmp/stored_exception_source ]]
then
cat /tmp/stored_exception
cat /tmp/stored_exception_line
cat /tmp/stored_exception_source
else
echo -e " \n${BASH_LINENO[1]}\n${BASH_SOURCE[2]#./}"
fi
rm -f /tmp/stored_exception /tmp/stored_exception_line /tmp/stored_exception_source
return 0
}
你可以自由使用,分叉和贡献——它在GitHub上。
其他回答
Bash中有TRY CATCH命令吗?
不。
Bash不像在许多编程语言中那样拥有那么多奢侈的东西。
bash中没有try/catch;但是,可以使用&&或||实现类似的行为。
使用| |:
如果command1失败,则command2按如下方式运行
command1 || command2
类似地,使用&&,如果command1成功,command2将运行
try/catch最接近的近似如下
{ # try
command1 &&
#save your output
} || { # catch
# save log for exception
}
此外,bash还包含一些错误处理机制
set -e
如果任何简单的命令失败,它将停止脚本。
还有为什么不是if…else。它是你最好的朋友。
根据我在这里找到的一些答案,我为自己的项目制作了一个小的帮助文件:
trycatch.sh
#!/bin/bash
function try()
{
[[ $- = *e* ]]; SAVED_OPT_E=$?
set +e
}
function throw()
{
exit $1
}
function catch()
{
export ex_code=$?
(( $SAVED_OPT_E )) && set +e
return $ex_code
}
function throwErrors()
{
set -e
}
function ignoreErrors()
{
set +e
}
下面是它在使用中的示例:
#!/bin/bash
export AnException=100
export AnotherException=101
# start with a try
try
( # open a subshell !!!
echo "do something"
[ someErrorCondition ] && throw $AnException
echo "do something more"
executeCommandThatMightFail || throw $AnotherException
throwErrors # automaticatly end the try block, if command-result is non-null
echo "now on to something completely different"
executeCommandThatMightFail
echo "it's a wonder we came so far"
executeCommandThatFailsForSure || true # ignore a single failing command
ignoreErrors # ignore failures of commands until further notice
executeCommand1ThatFailsForSure
local result = $(executeCommand2ThatFailsForSure)
[ result != "expected error" ] && throw $AnException # ok, if it's not an expected error, we want to bail out!
executeCommand3ThatFailsForSure
# make sure to clear $ex_code, otherwise catch * will run
# echo "finished" does the trick for this example
echo "finished"
)
# directly after closing the subshell you need to connect a group to the catch using ||
catch || {
# now you can handle
case $ex_code in
$AnException)
echo "AnException was thrown"
;;
$AnotherException)
echo "AnotherException was thrown"
;;
*)
echo "An unexpected exception was thrown"
throw $ex_code # you can rethrow the "exception" causing the script to exit if not caught
;;
esac
}
你可以使用trap:
try {block A} catch {block B} finally {block C}
翻译:
(
set -Ee
function _catch {
block B
exit 0 # optional; use if you don't want to propagate (rethrow) error to outer shell
}
function _finally {
block C
}
trap _catch ERR
trap _finally EXIT
block A
)
Bash不会在检测到错误状态时中止正在运行的执行(除非您设置了-e标志)。提供try/catch的编程语言这样做是为了抑制由于这种特殊情况而产生的“保释”(因此通常称为“异常”)。
相反,在bash中,只有有问题的命令将退出,退出码大于0,表示错误状态。当然,您可以检查这一点,但由于没有任何自动保释,因此try/catch没有意义。它只是缺乏背景。
然而,你可以通过使用子壳来模拟一个保释,它可以在你决定的点终止:
(
echo "Do one thing"
echo "Do another thing"
if some_condition
then
exit 3 # <-- this is our simulated bailing out
fi
echo "Do yet another thing"
echo "And do a last thing"
) # <-- here we arrive after the simulated bailing out, and $? will be 3 (exit code)
if [ $? = 3 ]
then
echo "Bail out detected"
fi
而不是some_condition的if你也可以尝试一个命令,如果它失败(退出码大于0),保释:
(
echo "Do one thing"
echo "Do another thing"
some_command || exit 3
echo "Do yet another thing"
echo "And do a last thing"
)
...
不幸的是,使用这种技术只能使用255个不同的退出码(1..255),而且不能使用像样的异常对象。
如果你需要更多的信息来传递模拟异常,你可以使用subshell的stdout,但这有点复杂,可能是另一个问题;-)
使用上面提到的-e标志,你甚至可以剥离显式的退出语句:
(
set -e
echo "Do one thing"
echo "Do another thing"
some_command
echo "Do yet another thing"
echo "And do a last thing"
)
...
你有陷阱http://www.tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/sect_12_02.html,这是不一样的,但你可以使用其他技术来达到这个目的
推荐文章
- 如何从查找“类型d”中排除此/ current / dot文件夹
- 检查bash变量是否等于0
- 只使用md5sum获取哈希值(没有文件名)
- 如何生成一个核心转储在Linux上的分段错误?
- 使用sh shell比较字符串
- 在Bash中测试非零长度字符串:[-n "$var"]或["$var"]
- 如何删除超过X小时的文件
- 如何创建Bash别名?
- 如何设置ssh超时时间?
- 将所有变量从一个shell脚本传递到另一个?
- 捕获所有JavaScript错误并将其发送到服务器
- 只列出UNIX中的目录
- 如何删除shell脚本中文件名的扩展名?
- 使用xargs调用shell函数
- 如何限制从grep返回的结果的数量?