因为大多数开发人员都熟悉基于标记/注释的文档，所以我开始使用的约定是类似的。来尝尝:

{
  "@comment dependencies": [
    "These are the comments for the `dependencies` section.",
    "The name of the section being commented is included in the key after the `@comment` 'annotation'/'tag' to ensure the keys are unique.",
    "That is, using just \"@comment\" would not be sufficient to keep keys unique if you need to add another comment at the same level.",
    "Because JSON doesn't allow a multi-line string or understand a line continuation operator/character, just use an array for each line of the comment.",
    "Since this is embedded in JSON, the keys should be unique.",
    "Otherwise JSON validators, such as ones built into IDEs, will complain.",
    "Or some tools, such as running `npm install something --save`, will rewrite the `package.json` file but with duplicate keys removed.",
    "",
    "@package react - Using an `@package` 'annotation` could be how you add comments specific to particular packages."
  ],
  "dependencies": {
    ...
  },
  "@comment scripts": {
    "build": "This comment is about the build script.",
    "start": [
      "This comment is about the `start` script.",
      "It is wrapped in an array to allow line formatting.",
      "When using npm, as opposed to yarn, to run the script, be sure to add ` -- ` before adding the options.",
      "",
      "@option {number} --port - The port the server should listen on."
    ],
    "test": "This comment is about the test script.",
  },
  "scripts": {
    "build": "...",
    "start": "...",
    "test": "..."
  }
}

注意:对于dependencies、devDependencies等部分，注释注释不能直接添加到配置对象中各个包依赖项的上面，因为npm期望键是npm包的名称。这就是@comment依赖的原因。

我喜欢在JSON中添加注释的注释/标记样式，因为@符号与普通声明不同。

年长的建议

以下是我之前的建议。它内联注释的脚本，但我已经意识到，这些注释显示为“命令”在一些工具(在VS Code > Explorer > NPM脚本部分)。最新的建议没有受到这个问题的影响，但是脚本注释不再位于同一位置。

{
  "@comment dependencies": [
    ...
  ],
  "dependencies": {
    ...
  },
  "scripts": {
    "@comment build": "This comment is about the build script.",
    "build": "...",

    "@comment start": [
      "This comment is about the `start` script.",
      "It is wrapped in an array to allow line formatting.",
      "When using npm, as opposed to yarn, to run the script, be sure to add ` -- ` before adding the options.",
      "",
      "@option {number} --port - The port the server should listen on."
    ],
    "start": "...",

    "@comment test": "This comment is about the test script.",
    "test": "..."
  }
}

注意:在某些情况下，例如在“scripts”对象中，一些编辑器/ ide可能会抱怨数组。在脚本上下文中，VS Code期望值为字符串——而不是数组。

我做了一些你们可能会喜欢的事情:

这个//在名字里面意味着它是我的注释:

  "//":"Main and typings are used till ES5",
  "//main": "build/index",
  "//typings": "build/index",

最近在Node.js邮件列表中讨论了这个问题。

根据创建npm的Isaac Schlueter的说法:

．.． "//"键永远不会被NPM用于任何目的，它是为注释保留的…如果想使用多行注释，可以使用数组或多个“//”键。

当使用你常用的工具(npm, yarn等)时，多个“//”键将被移除。这生存:

{ "//": [
  "first line",
  "second line" ] }

这将不复存在:

{ "//": "this is the first line of a comment",
  "//": "this is the second line of the comment" }

必须注意，"//"只能在包的根目录下使用。json对象。例如 ｛ “/ /”:“评论!” “依赖”:{…} ｝ 是有效的但是 ｛ “依赖”:{ “/ /”:“评论?” ｝ ｝ 是无效的。 ——@david_p评论

NPS(节点包脚本)为我解决了这个问题。它允许你把NPM脚本放到一个单独的JavaScript文件中，在那里你可以添加大量的注释和任何其他你需要的JavaScript逻辑。 https://www.npmjs.com/package/nps

来自我的一个项目的package-scripts.js示例

module.exports = {
  scripts: {
    // makes sure e2e webdrivers are up to date
    postinstall: 'nps webdriver-update',

    // run the webpack dev server and open it in browser on port 7000
    server: 'webpack-dev-server --inline --progress --port 7000 --open',

    // start webpack dev server with full reload on each change
    default: 'nps server',

    // start webpack dev server with hot module replacement
    hmr: 'nps server -- --hot',

    // generates icon font via a gulp task
    iconFont: 'gulp default --gulpfile src/deps/build-scripts/gulp-icon-font.js',

    // No longer used
    // copyFonts: 'copyfiles -f src/app/glb/font/webfonts/**/* dist/1-0-0/font'
  }
}

我只是做了一个本地安装npm安装nps -save-dev，并把它放在我的包。json脚本。

"scripts": {
    "start": "nps",
    "test": "nps test"
}

在浪费了一个小时的复杂和俗套的解决方案后，我找到了注释package.json中庞大的依赖项部分的简单而有效的解决方案。就像这样:

{
  "name": "package name",
  "version": "1.0",
  "description": "package description",
  "scripts": {
    "start": "npm install && node server.js"
  },
  "scriptsComments": {
    "start": "Runs development build on a local server configured by server.js"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "ajv": "^5.2.2"
  },
  "dependenciesComments": {
    "ajv": "JSON-Schema Validator for validation of API data"
  }
}

当以同样的方式排序时，现在我很容易在Git提交差异中或在编辑器中跟踪这些依赖/注释对，同时使用package.json文件。

不需要使用额外的工具，只需要简单有效的JSON。

As of pnpm 7.17.1, which was just released, you can switch to pnpm for package management, move your package.json to package.json5, and comments in package.json5 are allowed and will be preserved by pnpm. Note however that for publishing as a package to use on the npm registry (for example), a package.json5 will not be recognized by other package managers and I doubt by all of the registry's processing. So you would have to convert the package.json5 to a package.json before publishing. On the other hand, for "top-level applications" that are unlikely to be included as packages in other projects, a package.json5 seems to work just fine, as long as you then stick with pnpm as your package manager.