我听说有人选择了其中一种方式,并对其中一种方式发誓。
作为一个Eclipse的忠实粉丝,但没有时间尝试IntelliJ,我很有兴趣从“前Eclipse用户”IntelliJ用户那里听到一些用IntelliJ可以做而用Eclipse不能做的具体事情。
注意:这不是一个主观的问题,也不意味着变成一场IDE圣战。请为任何煽动性的答案投票。
我听说有人选择了其中一种方式,并对其中一种方式发誓。
作为一个Eclipse的忠实粉丝,但没有时间尝试IntelliJ,我很有兴趣从“前Eclipse用户”IntelliJ用户那里听到一些用IntelliJ可以做而用Eclipse不能做的具体事情。
注意:这不是一个主观的问题,也不意味着变成一场IDE圣战。请为任何煽动性的答案投票。
当前回答
Well, for me it's a thousand tiny things. Some of the macros, the GUI layout in general in Eclipse I find awful. I can't open multiple projects in different windows in Eclipse. I can open multiple projects, but then it's view based system swaps a bunch of things around on me when I switch files. IntelliJ's code inspections seem better. Its popup helpers to fix common issues is nice. Lots of simple usability things like the side bar where I can hover over a hot spot and it'll tell me every implementing subclass of a method or the method I'm implementing and from where.
每当我不得不使用Eclipse时,或者看到别人使用Eclipse时,他们似乎可以做我在IntelliJ中可以做的大部分事情,但它花费的时间更长,而且更笨重。
其他回答
IntelliJ调试器有一个非常方便的特性,叫做“表达式计算”,这比eclipses pendant好得多。它有完整的代码完成,我认为它通常“更有用”。
一个非常有用的特性是能够部分构建Maven反应堆项目,以便只包括您需要的部分。
To make this a little clearer, consider the case of a collection of WAR files with a lot of common resources (e.g. JavaScript, Spring config files etc) being shared between them using the overlay technique. If you are working on some web page (running in Jetty) and want to change some of the overlay code that is held in a separate module then you'd normally expect to have to stop Jetty, run the Maven build, start Jetty again and continue. This is the case with Eclipse and just about every other IDE I've worked with. Not so in IntelliJ. Using the project settings you can define which facet of which module you would like to be included in a background build. Consequently you end up with a process that appears seamless. You make a change to pretty much any code in the project and instantly it is available after you refresh the browser.
非常简洁,而且非常快。
我无法想象在没有它的情况下,在像YUI这样的东西中编写一个返回到DWR/SpringMVC的前端。
我在IntelliJ中最喜欢的快捷方式是“转到符号”,这在Eclipse中是没有对应的(我发现的)。CTRL-ALT-SHIFT-N让你开始输入和glob类,方法名,变量名等,从整个项目。
就这篇文章而言,我的时机可能有点不对,但我必须做出回应。
我是一个超级日食迷——从它第一次出现就开始使用它。一个朋友告诉我(10多年前),这将是一个播放器。他是对的。
然而!我刚刚开始使用IntelliJ,如果您还没有见过或使用过变更列表,那么您就错过了编程的天堂。
The ability to track my changed files (on my development branch ala clearcase) was something I was looking for in a plugin for eclipse. Intellij tracks all of your changes for a single commit, extremely easy. You can isolate changed files with custom lists. I use that for configuration files that must be unique locally, but are constantly flagged when I sync or compare against the repository -- listing them under a changelist, I can monitor them, but neatly tuck them away so I can focus on the real additions I am making.
此外,还有一个提交日志插件,可以输出那些没有与错误跟踪软件集成的SCCS的所有更改的文本。将日志粘贴到票据的工作历史记录中可以捕获文件、它们的版本、日期/时间和分支/标记。太酷了。
我打赌,所有这些都可以通过eclipse中的插件(或未来的增强)来支持;然而,Intellij使这变得轻而易举。
最后,我真的很高兴主流对这款产品的喜爱——按键,所以它很痛苦,但很有趣。
Well, for me it's a thousand tiny things. Some of the macros, the GUI layout in general in Eclipse I find awful. I can't open multiple projects in different windows in Eclipse. I can open multiple projects, but then it's view based system swaps a bunch of things around on me when I switch files. IntelliJ's code inspections seem better. Its popup helpers to fix common issues is nice. Lots of simple usability things like the side bar where I can hover over a hot spot and it'll tell me every implementing subclass of a method or the method I'm implementing and from where.
每当我不得不使用Eclipse时,或者看到别人使用Eclipse时,他们似乎可以做我在IntelliJ中可以做的大部分事情,但它花费的时间更长,而且更笨重。