我想要求我的文件总是通过我的项目的根,而不是相对于当前模块。

例如,如果查看https://github.com/visionmedia/express/blob/2820f2227de0229c5d7f28009aa432f9f3a7b5f9/examples/downloads/app.js第6行,您将看到

express = require('../../')

在我看来,这真的很糟糕。假设我想让我所有的例子都只靠近根结点一层。这是不可能的,因为我必须更新超过30个例子,并且在每个例子中更新很多次。:

express = require('../')

我的解决方案是有一个基于根的特殊情况:如果字符串以$开头,那么它相对于项目的根文件夹。

任何帮助都是感激的,谢谢

更新2

现在我使用require.js,它允许你以一种方式编写,在客户端和服务器上都可以工作。Require.js还允许你创建自定义路径。

更新3

现在我转移到webpack + gulp,我使用enhanced-require来处理服务器端模块。看这里的基本原理:http://hackhat.com/p/110/module-loader-webpack-vs-requirejs-vs-browserify/


当前回答

恕我直言,最简单的方法是将自己的函数定义为GLOBAL对象的一部分。 在项目的根目录下创建projRequire.js,包含以下内容:

var projectDir = __dirname;

module.exports = GLOBAL.projRequire = function(module) {
  return require(projectDir + module);
}

在你的主文件中,在需要任何特定于项目的模块之前:

// init projRequire
require('./projRequire');

之后,以下工作对我来说:

// main file
projRequire('/lib/lol');

// index.js at projectDir/lib/lol/index.js
console.log('Ok');

@Totty,我想出了另一个解决方案,可以解决你在评论中描述的情况。描述将是tl;dr,所以我最好展示我的测试项目的结构的图片。

其他回答

在Browserify手册中有一个非常有趣的章节:

avoiding ../../../../../../.. Not everything in an application properly belongs on the public npm and the overhead of setting up a private npm or git repo is still rather large in many cases. Here are some approaches for avoiding the ../../../../../../../ relative paths problem. node_modules People sometimes object to putting application-specific modules into node_modules because it is not obvious how to check in your internal modules without also checking in third-party modules from npm. The answer is quite simple! If you have a .gitignore file that ignores node_modules: node_modules You can just add an exception with ! for each of your internal application modules: node_modules/* !node_modules/foo !node_modules/bar Please note that you can't unignore a subdirectory, if the parent is already ignored. So instead of ignoring node_modules, you have to ignore every directory inside node_modules with the node_modules/* trick, and then you can add your exceptions. Now anywhere in your application you will be able to require('foo') or require('bar') without having a very large and fragile relative path. If you have a lot of modules and want to keep them more separate from the third-party modules installed by npm, you can just put them all under a directory in node_modules such as node_modules/app: node_modules/app/foo node_modules/app/bar Now you will be able to require('app/foo') or require('app/bar') from anywhere in your application. In your .gitignore, just add an exception for node_modules/app: node_modules/* !node_modules/app If your application had transforms configured in package.json, you'll need to create a separate package.json with its own transform field in your node_modules/foo or node_modules/app/foo component directory because transforms don't apply across module boundaries. This will make your modules more robust against configuration changes in your application and it will be easier to independently reuse the packages outside of your application. symlink Another handy trick if you are working on an application where you can make symlinks and don't need to support windows is to symlink a lib/ or app/ folder into node_modules. From the project root, do: ln -s ../lib node_modules/app and now from anywhere in your project you'll be able to require files in lib/ by doing require('app/foo.js') to get lib/foo.js. custom paths You might see some places talk about using the $NODE_PATH environment variable or opts.paths to add directories for node and browserify to look in to find modules. Unlike most other platforms, using a shell-style array of path directories with $NODE_PATH is not as favorable in node compared to making effective use of the node_modules directory. This is because your application is more tightly coupled to a runtime environment configuration so there are more moving parts and your application will only work when your environment is setup correctly. node and browserify both support but discourage the use of $NODE_PATH.

这里已经有很多好答案了。这只是说明这是一个普遍的问题,没有明确的最佳解决方案。当然最好是在Node.js中提供本地支持。以下是我目前使用的:

const r  = p => require (process.cwd() + p);
let see  = r ('/Subs/SubA/someFile.js' );
let see2 = r ('/Subs/SubB/someFile2.js');
...

我喜欢这个解决方案,因为require部分变得更短,不需要键入'require'很多次。绝对路径的主要好处是,您可以将它们从一个文件复制到另一个文件,而不必像使用相对路径那样对它们进行调整。因此,复制额外的一行箭头函数'r()'也不会有太多额外的工作。为了完成这个非常简单的任务,不需要导入额外的npm依赖项。

我喜欢做的是利用node从node_module目录加载的方式。

如果有人试图加载“thing”模块,他会做如下的事情

require('thing');

Node将在'node_module'目录中查找'thing'目录。

由于node_module通常位于项目的根,所以我们可以利用这种一致性。(如果node_module不在根节点上,那么您就会遇到其他令人头痛的问题。)

如果我们进入目录,然后从目录中返回,我们可以获得到节点项目根的一致路径。

require('thing/../../');

如果我们想访问/happy目录,我们会这样做。

require('thing/../../happy');

虽然这有点粗糙,但是我觉得如果node_modules加载的功能发生了变化,将会有更大的问题需要处理。这种行为应该保持一致。

为了使事情更清楚,我这样做,因为模块的名称并不重要。

require('root/../../happy');

我最近在angular2中使用了它。我想从根目录加载服务。

import {MyService} from 'root/../../app/services/http/my.service';

你可以用我做的一个模块,Undot。它没有什么高级的,只是一个助手,让你可以避免那些点地狱与简单。

例子:

var undot = require('undot');
var User = undot('models/user');
var config = undot('config');
var test = undot('test/api/user/auth');

恕我直言,最简单的方法是将自己的函数定义为GLOBAL对象的一部分。 在项目的根目录下创建projRequire.js,包含以下内容:

var projectDir = __dirname;

module.exports = GLOBAL.projRequire = function(module) {
  return require(projectDir + module);
}

在你的主文件中,在需要任何特定于项目的模块之前:

// init projRequire
require('./projRequire');

之后,以下工作对我来说:

// main file
projRequire('/lib/lol');

// index.js at projectDir/lib/lol/index.js
console.log('Ok');

@Totty,我想出了另一个解决方案,可以解决你在评论中描述的情况。描述将是tl;dr,所以我最好展示我的测试项目的结构的图片。