我有一个使用Spring Security的Spring MVC web应用程序。我想知道当前登录用户的用户名。我正在使用下面给出的代码片段。这是公认的方式吗?
我不喜欢在这个控制器中调用静态方法——恕我直言，这违背了Spring的全部目的。有没有一种方法来配置应用程序有当前的SecurityContext，或当前的认证，注入代替?
@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
public ModelAndView showResults(final HttpServletRequest request...) {
final String currentUser = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getName();
...
}
当前回答
试试这个
认证认证= .getAuthentication SecurityContextHolder.getContext () (); 字符串userName = authentication.getName();
其他回答
我得到认证的用户 HttpServletRequest.getUserPrincipal ();
例子:
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.security.web.authentication.preauth.RequestHeaderAuthenticationFilter;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Controller;
import org.springframework.ui.Model;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMethod;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.support.RequestContext;
import foo.Form;
@Controller
@RequestMapping(value="/welcome")
public class IndexController {
@RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.GET)
public String getCreateForm(Model model, HttpServletRequest request) {
if(request.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
String loginName = request.getUserPrincipal().getName();
System.out.println("loginName : " + loginName );
}
model.addAttribute("form", new Form());
return "welcome";
}
}
对于我写的上一个Spring MVC应用程序，我没有注入SecurityContext holder，但我确实有一个基本控制器，我有两个实用程序方法与此相关…isAuthenticated() & getUsername()。在内部，它们执行您所描述的静态方法调用。
至少在以后需要重构时，它只在一个地方。
您可以使用Spring AOP方法。 例如，如果你有一些服务，它需要知道当前的本金。您可以引入自定义注释，例如@Principal，它表明该服务应该是依赖于主体的。
public class SomeService {
private String principal;
@Principal
public setPrincipal(String principal){
this.principal=principal;
}
}
然后在您的通知中，我认为需要扩展MethodBeforeAdvice，检查特定的服务有@Principal注释并注入Principal名称，或者将其设置为'ANONYMOUS'。
Yes, statics are generally bad - generally, but in this case, the static is the most secure code you can write. Since the security context associates a Principal with the currently running thread, the most secure code would access the static from the thread as directly as possible. Hiding the access behind a wrapper class that is injected provides an attacker with more points to attack. They wouldn't need access to the code (which they would have a hard time changing if the jar was signed), they just need a way to override the configuration, which can be done at runtime or slipping some XML onto the classpath. Even using annotation injection in the signed code would be overridable with external XML. Such XML could inject the running system with a rogue principal. This is probably why Spring is doing something so un-Spring-like in this case.
为了让它只显示在JSP页面中，你可以使用Spring Security标签库:
http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/docs/3.0.x/reference/taglibs.html
要使用任何标记，必须在JSP中声明安全标记库:
<%@ taglib prefix="security" uri="http://www.springframework.org/security/tags" %>
然后在jsp页面中执行如下操作:
<security:authorize access="isAuthenticated()">
logged in as <security:authentication property="principal.username" />
</security:authorize>
<security:authorize access="! isAuthenticated()">
not logged in
</security:authorize>
注意:正如@SBerg413在评论中提到的，您需要添加
use-expressions = " true "
到security.xml配置中的“http”标签以使其工作。
