我认为在这种情况下，您将需要Write-Output。

如果你有一个脚本

Write-Output "test1";
Write-Host "test2";
"test3";

然后，如果你调用带有重定向输出的脚本，就像你的脚本。Ps1 > out.txt，你将得到屏幕上的test2 test1\ntest3\n在“out.txt”。

请注意，"test3"和Write-Output行总是会在你的文本中追加一个新行，在PowerShell中没有办法停止这一点(也就是说，echo -n在PowerShell的本机命令中是不可能的)。如果你想要echo -n的功能(在Bash中有点基本和简单)，请参阅samthebest的答案。

If a batch file runs a PowerShell command, it will most likely capture the Write-Output command. I have had "long discussions" with system administrators about what should be written to the console and what should not. We have now agreed that the only information if the script executed successfully or died has to be Write-Host'ed, and everything that is the script's author might need to know about the execution (what items were updated, what fields were set, et cetera) goes to Write-Output. This way, when you submit a script to the system administrator, he can easily runthescript.ps1 >someredirectedoutput.txt and see on the screen, if everything is OK. Then send the "someredirectedoutput.txt" back to the developers.

您可以在您的场景中使用其中任何一种，因为它们写入默认流(输出和错误)。如果要将输出输送到另一个命令集，则需要使用Write-Output，它最终将在Write-Host中终止。

本文描述了不同的输出选项:PowerShell O用于输出

我认为下面是Echo vs. Write-Host的一个很好的展示。请注意test()实际上是如何返回一个整数数组，而不是一个整数，因为人们很容易相信。

function test {
    Write-Host 123
    echo 456 # AKA 'Write-Output'
    return 789
}

$x = test

Write-Host "x of type '$($x.GetType().name)' = $x"

Write-Host "`$x[0] = $($x[0])"
Write-Host "`$x[1] = $($x[1])"

上述终端输出:

123
x of type 'Object[]' = 456 789
$x[0] = 456
$x[1] = 789

我认为在这种情况下，您将需要Write-Output。

如果你有一个脚本

Write-Output "test1";
Write-Host "test2";
"test3";

然后，如果你调用带有重定向输出的脚本，就像你的脚本。Ps1 > out.txt，你将得到屏幕上的test2 test1\ntest3\n在“out.txt”。

请注意，"test3"和Write-Output行总是会在你的文本中追加一个新行，在PowerShell中没有办法停止这一点(也就是说，echo -n在PowerShell的本机命令中是不可能的)。如果你想要echo -n的功能(在Bash中有点基本和简单)，请参阅samthebest的答案。

If a batch file runs a PowerShell command, it will most likely capture the Write-Output command. I have had "long discussions" with system administrators about what should be written to the console and what should not. We have now agreed that the only information if the script executed successfully or died has to be Write-Host'ed, and everything that is the script's author might need to know about the execution (what items were updated, what fields were set, et cetera) goes to Write-Output. This way, when you submit a script to the system administrator, he can easily runthescript.ps1 >someredirectedoutput.txt and see on the screen, if everything is OK. Then send the "someredirectedoutput.txt" back to the developers.

Write-Host "Found file - " + $File.FullName -ForegroundColor Magenta

洋红色可以是“系统”之一。ConsoleColor”枚举值-黑色，深蓝色，深绿色，暗青色，暗红色，暗品红，暗黄色，灰色，暗灰色，蓝色，绿色，青色，红色，品红，黄色，白色。

+ $文件。FullName是可选的，它显示了如何将变量放入字符串中。

用什么东西来写入Windows的标准输出是正确的?

实际上，但非常不幸的是，Windows PowerShell和PowerShell Core从v7.2开始，当从外部通过PowerShell的CLI调用时，都将它们所有的6(!)输出流发送到stdout。

See GitHub issue #7989 for a discussion of this problematic behavior, which likely won't get fixed, so as to preserve backward compatibility. In practice, this means that whatever PowerShell stream you send output to will be seen as stdout output by an external caller: E.g., if you run the following from cmd.exe, you'll see no output, because the stdout redirection to NUL applies equally to all PowerShell streams: C:\>powershell -noprofile -command "Write-Error error!" >NUL However - curiously - if you redirect stderr, PowerShell does send its error stream to stderr, so that with 2> you can capture the error-stream output selectively; the following outputs just 'hi' - the success-stream output - while capturing the error-stream output in file err.txt: C:\>powershell -noprofile -command "'hi'; Write-Error error!" 2>err.txt

理想的行为是:

将PowerShell的成功输出流(编号1)发送到标准输出。 将所有其他流的输出发送到stderr，这是唯一的选项，因为在进程之间只存在两个输出流——用于数据的stdout(标准输出)，用于错误消息和所有其他类型的消息(如状态信息)的stderr(标准错误)，这些消息都不是数据。 建议在您的代码中进行这种区分，即使目前还没有这样做。

在PowerShell:

Write-Host is for display output, and bypasses the success output stream - as such, its output can neither be (directly) captured in a variable nor suppressed nor redirected. Its original intent was simply to create user feedback and create simple, console-based user interfaces (colored output). Due to the prior inability to be captured or redirected, PowerShell version 5 made Write-Host write to the newly introduced information stream (number 6), so since then it is possible to capture and redirect Write-Host output. Write-Error is meant for writing non-terminating errors to the error stream (number 2); conceptually, the error stream is the equivalent of stderr. Write-Output writes to the success [output] stream (number 1), which is conceptually equivalent to stdout; it is the stream to write data (results) to. However, explicit use of Write-Output is rarely needed due to PowerShell's implicit output feature: Output from any command or expression that isn't explicitly captured, suppressed or redirected is automatically sent to the success stream; e.g., Write-Output "Honey, I'm $HOME" and "Honey, I'm $HOME" are equivalent, with the latter not only being more concise, but also faster. See this answer for more information.