You cannot prevent the process on the far end of a pipe from exiting, and if it exits before you've finished writing, you will get a SIGPIPE signal. If you SIG_IGN the signal, then your write will return with an error - and you need to note and react to that error. Just catching and ignoring the signal in a handler is not a good idea -- you must note that the pipe is now defunct and modify the program's behaviour so it does not write to the pipe again (because the signal will be generated again, and ignored again, and you'll try again, and the whole process could go on for a long time and waste a lot of CPU power).

我加入这个聚会非常晚，但是SO_NOSIGPIPE是不可移植的，并且可能无法在您的系统上工作(这似乎是BSD的事情)。

如果您在一个没有SO_NOSIGPIPE的Linux系统上，可以在send(2)调用上设置MSG_NOSIGNAL标志。

示例用send(…，MSG_NOSIGNAL)替换write(…)(参见nobar的注释)

char buf[888];
//write( sockfd, buf, sizeof(buf) );
send(    sockfd, buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_NOSIGNAL );

You cannot prevent the process on the far end of a pipe from exiting, and if it exits before you've finished writing, you will get a SIGPIPE signal. If you SIG_IGN the signal, then your write will return with an error - and you need to note and react to that error. Just catching and ignoring the signal in a handler is not a good idea -- you must note that the pipe is now defunct and modify the program's behaviour so it does not write to the pipe again (because the signal will be generated again, and ignored again, and you'll try again, and the whole process could go on for a long time and waste a lot of CPU power).

在这篇文章中，我描述了SO_NOSIGPIPE和MSG_NOSIGNAL都不可用的Solaris情况下可能的解决方案。

Instead, we have to temporarily suppress SIGPIPE in the current thread that executes library code. Here's how to do this: to suppress SIGPIPE we first check if it is pending. If it does, this means that it is blocked in this thread, and we have to do nothing. If the library generates additional SIGPIPE, it will be merged with the pending one, and that's a no-op. If SIGPIPE is not pending then we block it in this thread, and also check whether it was already blocked. Then we are free to execute our writes. When we are to restore SIGPIPE to its original state, we do the following: if SIGPIPE was pending originally, we do nothing. Otherwise we check if it is pending now. If it does (which means that out actions have generated one or more SIGPIPEs), then we wait for it in this thread, thus clearing its pending status (to do this we use sigtimedwait() with zero timeout; this is to avoid blocking in a scenario where malicious user sent SIGPIPE manually to a whole process: in this case we will see it pending, but other thread may handle it before we had a change to wait for it). After clearing pending status we unblock SIGPIPE in this thread, but only if it wasn't blocked originally.

示例代码位于https://github.com/kroki/XProbes/blob/1447f3d93b6dbf273919af15e59f35cca58fcc23/src/libxprobes.c#L156

另一种方法是改变套接字，这样它就不会在write()时生成SIGPIPE。这在库中更方便，因为在库中您可能不需要SIGPIPE的全局信号处理程序。

在大多数基于bsd (MacOS, FreeBSD…)的系统上，(假设你使用的是C/ c++)，你可以通过以下方法做到这一点:

int set = 1;
setsockopt(sd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_NOSIGPIPE, (void *)&set, sizeof(int));

这样，就不会生成SIGPIPE信号，而是返回EPIPE信号。

在现代POSIX系统(即Linux)下，可以使用sigprocmask()函数。

#include <signal.h>

void block_signal(int signal_to_block /* i.e. SIGPIPE */ )
{
    sigset_t set;
    sigset_t old_state;

    // get the current state
    //
    sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, &old_state);

    // add signal_to_block to that existing state
    //
    set = old_state;
    sigaddset(&set, signal_to_block);

    // block that signal also
    //
    sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &set, NULL);

    // ... deal with old_state if required ...
}

如果您想稍后恢复以前的状态，请确保将old_state保存在安全的地方。如果你多次调用这个函数，你需要使用一个堆栈，或者只保存第一个或最后一个old_state…或者有一个函数可以移除特定的阻塞信号。

更多信息请阅读手册页。