http://jsfiddle.net/vol7ron/gfJ28/

var arr  = ['hello','goodbye','foo','hello','foo','bar',1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3];
var hash = [];

// build hash
for (var n=arr.length; n--; ){
   if (typeof hash[arr[n]] === 'undefined') hash[arr[n]] = [];
   hash[arr[n]].push(n);
}


// work with compiled hash (not necessary)
var duplicates = [];
for (var key in hash){
    if (hash.hasOwnProperty(key) && hash[key].length > 1){
        duplicates.push(key);
    }
}    
alert(duplicates);

The result will be the hash array, which will contain both a unique set of values and the position of those values. So if there are 2 or more positions, we can determine that the value has a duplicate. Thus, every place hash[<value>].length > 1, signifies a duplicate. hash['hello'] will return [0,3] because 'hello' was found in node 0 and 3 in arr[]. Note: the length of [0,3] is what's used to determine if it was a duplicate. Using for(var key in hash){ if (hash.hasOwnProperty(key)){ alert(key); } } will alert each unique value.

这是我用map实现的。它应该运行在O(n)时间，应该有点容易喘气。

var first_array = [1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6); var find_dup=new Map; For (first_array的const迭代器){ //如果现值++ 如果(find_dup.has (iterator)) { find_dup.set(迭代器,find_dup.get(迭代器)+ 1); 其他}{ //否则添加 find_dup.set(迭代器,1); ｝ ｝ console.log (find_dup.get (2));

然后你可以find_dup.get(key)来查找它是否有重复(它应该给> 1)。

更新:以下使用一个优化的组合策略。它优化了原语查找，以受益于散列O(1)查找时间(在原语数组上惟一地运行是O(n))。对象查找通过在遍历对象时用唯一id标记对象来优化，因此识别重复对象也是每个项目O(1)，整个列表O(n)。唯一的例外是被冻结的项目，但这种情况很少见，并且使用数组和indexOf提供了一个回退。

var unique = function(){
  var hasOwn = {}.hasOwnProperty,
      toString = {}.toString,
      uids = {};

  function uid(){
    var key = Math.random().toString(36).slice(2);
    return key in uids ? uid() : uids[key] = key;
  }

  function unique(array){
    var strings = {}, numbers = {}, others = {},
        tagged = [], failed = [],
        count = 0, i = array.length,
        item, type;

    var id = uid();

    while (i--) {
      item = array[i];
      type = typeof item;
      if (item == null || type !== 'object' && type !== 'function') {
        // primitive
        switch (type) {
          case 'string': strings[item] = true; break;
          case 'number': numbers[item] = true; break;
          default: others[item] = item; break;
        }
      } else {
        // object
        if (!hasOwn.call(item, id)) {
          try {
            item[id] = true;
            tagged[count++] = item;
          } catch (e){
            if (failed.indexOf(item) === -1)
              failed[failed.length] = item;
          }
        }
      }
    }

    // remove the tags
    while (count--)
      delete tagged[count][id];

    tagged = tagged.concat(failed);
    count = tagged.length;

    // append primitives to results
    for (i in strings)
      if (hasOwn.call(strings, i))
        tagged[count++] = i;

    for (i in numbers)
      if (hasOwn.call(numbers, i))
        tagged[count++] = +i;

    for (i in others)
      if (hasOwn.call(others, i))
        tagged[count++] = others[i];

    return tagged;
  }

  return unique;
}();

如果你有ES6集合可用，那么有一个更简单、更快的版本。(shim适用于IE9+和其他浏览器:https://github.com/Benvie/ES6-Harmony-Collections-Shim)

function unique(array){
  var seen = new Set;
  return array.filter(function(item){
    if (!seen.has(item)) {
      seen.add(item);
      return true;
    }
  });
}

这应该是在数组中查找重复值的最短和最简单的方法之一。

Var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,3,4]; Var数据= arr.filter(函数(项目，索引，arr){ 返回arr.indexOf(item) != arr.lastIndexOf(item) && arr.indexOf(item) == index; }) console.log(数据);

这里有一个非常简单的方法:

var codes = dc_1.split(',');
var i = codes.length;
while (i--) {
  if (codes.indexOf(codes[i]) != i) {
    codes.splice(i,1);
  }
}

在一次采访中有人问我这个问题，我的回答是，

List<int> getDublicates(List<int> x)
{
   List<int> result = new List<int>();
   while (x.Count>0)
   {
      int d = x[0];
      x.Remove(x[0]);
      if (x.Contains(d)) 
      result.Add(d);
   }
   return result;
}

它的性能很好