jQuery 1.5带来了新的Deferred对象和附加方法.when、.Deferred和. _deferred。
对于那些以前没有使用过. deferred的人，我已经为它注释了源代码。
这些新方法的可能用途是什么，我们如何将它们纳入模式?
我已经阅读了API和源代码，所以我知道它是做什么的。我的问题是我们如何在日常代码中使用这些新特性?
我有一个简单的缓冲区类示例，它按顺序调用AJAX请求。(上一个结束后下一个开始)。
/* Class: Buffer
* methods: append
*
* Constructor: takes a function which will be the task handler to be called
*
* .append appends a task to the buffer. Buffer will only call a task when the
* previous task has finished
*/
var Buffer = function(handler) {
var tasks = [];
// empty resolved deferred object
var deferred = $.when();
// handle the next object
function handleNextTask() {
// if the current deferred task has resolved and there are more tasks
if (deferred.isResolved() && tasks.length > 0) {
// grab a task
var task = tasks.shift();
// set the deferred to be deferred returned from the handler
deferred = handler(task);
// if its not a deferred object then set it to be an empty deferred object
if (!(deferred && deferred.promise)) {
deferred = $.when();
}
// if we have tasks left then handle the next one when the current one
// is done.
if (tasks.length > 0) {
deferred.done(handleNextTask);
}
}
}
// appends a task.
this.append = function(task) {
// add to the array
tasks.push(task);
// handle the next task
handleNextTask();
};
};
我正在寻找. deferred和.when的演示和可能的用法。
看到. _deferred的例子也很不错。
链接到新的jQuery。Ajax源代码的例子是作弊。
我特别感兴趣的是，当我们抽象出一个操作是同步完成还是异步完成时，可以使用哪些技术。
Another use that I've been putting to good purpose is fetching data from multiple sources. In the example below, I'm fetching multiple, independent JSON schema objects used in an existing application for validation between a client and a REST server. In this case, I don't want the browser-side application to start loading data before it has all the schemas loaded. $.when.apply().then() is perfect for this. Thank to Raynos for pointers on using then(fn1, fn2) to monitor for error conditions.
fetch_sources = function (schema_urls) {
var fetch_one = function (url) {
return $.ajax({
url: url,
data: {},
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
});
}
return $.map(schema_urls, fetch_one);
}
var promises = fetch_sources(data['schemas']);
$.when.apply(null, promises).then(
function () {
var schemas = $.map(arguments, function (a) {
return a[0]
});
start_application(schemas);
}, function () {
console.log("FAIL", this, arguments);
});
这里是一个与ehynd的答案略有不同的AJAX缓存实现。
正如fortuneRice的后续问题所指出的，如果请求在其中一个返回之前执行，ehynd的实现实际上并不能阻止多个相同的请求。也就是说,
for (var i=0; i<3; i++) {
getData("xxx");
}
如果“xxx”的结果之前没有被缓存过，很可能会导致3个AJAX请求。
这可以通过缓存请求的deferred而不是结果来解决:
var cache = {};
function getData( val ){
// Return a promise from the cache (if available)
// or create a new one (a jqXHR object) and store it in the cache.
var promise = cache[val];
if (!promise) {
promise = $.ajax('/foo/', {
data: { value: val },
dataType: 'json'
});
cache[val] = promise;
}
return promise;
}
$.when(getData('foo')).then(function(resp){
// do something with the response, which may
// or may not have been retreived using an
// XHR request.
});
可以用deferred来代替互斥量。这本质上与多个ajax使用场景相同。
互斥锁
var mutex = 2;
setTimeout(function() {
callback();
}, 800);
setTimeout(function() {
callback();
}, 500);
function callback() {
if (--mutex === 0) {
//run code
}
}
递延
function timeout(x) {
var dfd = jQuery.Deferred();
setTimeout(function() {
dfd.resolve();
}, x);
return dfd.promise();
}
jQuery.when(
timeout(800), timeout(500)).done(function() {
// run code
});
当只使用Deferred作为互斥量时，要注意性能影响(http://jsperf.com/deferred-vs-mutex/2)。虽然Deferred提供的便利和额外的好处是值得的，但在实际(基于用户驱动的事件)使用中，性能影响不应该很明显。
我能想到的最佳用例是缓存AJAX响应。以下是Rebecca murphy关于该主题的介绍帖子的修改示例:
var cache = {};
function getData( val ){
// return either the cached value or jqXHR object wrapped Promise
return $.when(
cache[ val ] ||
$.ajax('/foo/', {
data: { value: val },
dataType: 'json',
success: function( resp ){
cache[ val ] = resp;
}
})
);
}
getData('foo').then(function(resp){
// do something with the response, which may
// or may not have been retrieved using an
// XHR request.
});
基本上，如果值已经被请求过一次，然后立即从缓存中返回。否则，AJAX请求将获取数据并将其添加到缓存中。当美元/。然后不关心这些;您需要关心的是使用响应，在这两种情况下，响应都传递给.then()处理程序。jQuery.when()将非promise /Deferred处理为Completed，立即执行链上的.done()或.then()。
当任务可能异步操作，也可能不异步操作时，延迟非常适合，并且您希望从代码中抽象出该条件。
另一个使用$的真实例子。当助手:
$.when($.getJSON('/some/data/'), $.get('template.tpl')).then(function (data, tmpl) {
$(tmpl) // create a jQuery object out of the template
.tmpl(data) // compile it
.appendTo("#target"); // insert it into the DOM
});
ehyds的答案将不起作用，因为它缓存了响应数据。它应该缓存jqXHR，这也是一个Promise。
下面是正确的代码:
var cache = {};
function getData( val ){
// return either the cached value or an
// jqXHR object (which contains a promise)
return cache[ val ] || $.ajax('/foo/', {
data: { value: val },
dataType: 'json',
success: function(data, textStatus, jqXHR){
cache[ val ] = jqXHR;
}
});
}
getData('foo').then(function(resp){
// do something with the response, which may
// or may not have been retreived using an
// XHR request.
});
Julian d的答案是正确的，是一个更好的解决方案。
Another use that I've been putting to good purpose is fetching data from multiple sources. In the example below, I'm fetching multiple, independent JSON schema objects used in an existing application for validation between a client and a REST server. In this case, I don't want the browser-side application to start loading data before it has all the schemas loaded. $.when.apply().then() is perfect for this. Thank to Raynos for pointers on using then(fn1, fn2) to monitor for error conditions.
fetch_sources = function (schema_urls) {
var fetch_one = function (url) {
return $.ajax({
url: url,
data: {},
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
});
}
return $.map(schema_urls, fetch_one);
}
var promises = fetch_sources(data['schemas']);
$.when.apply(null, promises).then(
function () {
var schemas = $.map(arguments, function (a) {
return a[0]
});
start_application(schemas);
}, function () {
console.log("FAIL", this, arguments);
});
