你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

catch (Ex as Exception)
{
     // oh crap, we should do something.
}

没有什么比一个空的catch块更能让人觉得代码是健壮的....

其他回答

这是我今天重构一些代码时发现的一条评论

if( year < 100 ): year += 2000 #lol, Y2K

回到《Hitchhiker’s Guide》刚问世的时候,我曾经测试过某些内容是否可滚动,以及用户是否尝试着滚动,这是一种限制可变长度的语言。所以:

if (scroll and noScroll) # or tea and no tea

看这个:

'On Error Goto Hell.
[vrk:Cloud ID="cTags" runat="server" DataTextField="Tag" DataWeightField="Total"
    Width="100%" DataHrefField="Tag" DataHrefFormatString="~/tags.aspx?tag={0}"]
[/vrk:Cloud]

[!--if anybody would like to change the control's color contact with FLORJON--]

I don't have the code to share, but imagine this scenario. About a month or two after our Linux Sys Admin left for greener pastures, I had the pleasure of opening a shell script he'd written. I can't recall why I needed to edit it, but that's not what matters. What's important is that the script was about 40 lines long. I scrolled past the commenting (of which there were 37 lines) to reach the actual working code (3 lines). The code was great, but I was curious - why 37 lines of commenting? So, I scrolled to the top and proceeded to read. To my surprise, the commenting was a rap about what the three lines of code did and how to change it. The best part - it was a partial rip off of Nothing But A G Thing by Dr. Dre and Snoop D O DOUBLE G. Thanks Brian!