我喜欢用绳子。空字符串。空的，因为你可以使用它而不需要包含一个using System;在你的档案里。

至于在字符串上选择“”。空，这是个人喜好，应该由你的团队决定。

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/04/22/49997.aspx:

As David implies, there difference between String.Empty and "" are pretty small, but there is a difference. "" actually creates an object, it will likely be pulled out of the string intern pool, but still... while String.Empty creates no object... so if you are really looking for ultimately in memory efficiency, I suggest String.Empty. However, you should keep in mind the difference is so trival you will like never see it in your code... As for System.String.Empty or string.Empty or String.Empty... my care level is low ;-)

从性能和代码生成的角度来看，确实没有什么区别。在性能测试中，它们在哪个比另一个更快之间来回切换，而且仅以毫秒计。

在查看幕后代码时，您也看不到任何不同。唯一的区别在于IL，即字符串。空使用操作码ldsfld ""使用ldstr操作码，但这只是因为字符串。Empty是静态的，两个指令做相同的事情。 如果你看一下生产出来的组件，它是完全一样的。

c#代码

private void Test1()
{
    string test1 = string.Empty;    
    string test11 = test1;
}

private void Test2()
{
    string test2 = "";    
    string test22 = test2;
}

有密码

.method private hidebysig instance void 
          Test1() cil managed
{
  // Code size       10 (0xa)
  .maxstack  1
  .locals init ([0] string test1,
                [1] string test11)
  IL_0000:  nop
  IL_0001:  ldsfld     string [mscorlib]System.String::Empty
  IL_0006:  stloc.0
  IL_0007:  ldloc.0
  IL_0008:  stloc.1
  IL_0009:  ret
} // end of method Form1::Test1

.method private hidebysig instance void 
        Test2() cil managed
{
  // Code size       10 (0xa)
  .maxstack  1
  .locals init ([0] string test2,
                [1] string test22)
  IL_0000:  nop
  IL_0001:  ldstr      ""
  IL_0006:  stloc.0
  IL_0007:  ldloc.0
  IL_0008:  stloc.1
  IL_0009:  ret
} // end of method Form1::Test2

汇编代码

        string test1 = string.Empty;
0000003a  mov         eax,dword ptr ds:[022A102Ch] 
0000003f  mov         dword ptr [ebp-40h],eax 

        string test11 = test1;
00000042  mov         eax,dword ptr [ebp-40h] 
00000045  mov         dword ptr [ebp-44h],eax 

        string test2 = "";
0000003a  mov         eax,dword ptr ds:[022A202Ch] 
00000040  mov         dword ptr [ebp-40h],eax 

        string test22 = test2;
00000043  mov         eax,dword ptr [ebp-40h] 
00000046  mov         dword ptr [ebp-44h],eax 

I strongly prefer String.Empty, aside from the other reasons to ensure you know what it is and that you have not accidentally removed the contents, but primarily for internationalization. If I see a string in quotes then I always have to wonder whether that is new code and it should be put into a string table. So every time code gets changed/reviewed you need to look for "something in quotes" and yes you can filter out the empty strings but I tell people it is good practice to never put strings in quotes unless you know it won't get localized.

以上任何一种。

还有很多很多更好的事情可以指手画脚。比如什么颜色的树皮最适合一棵树，我认为是模糊的棕色和淡淡的苔藓。

使用您和您的团队认为最易读的内容。

其他答案表明，每次使用""都会创建一个新的字符串。这是不正确的-由于字符串实习，它将在每个程序集或每个AppDomain创建一次(或可能在整个过程中创建一次-在这方面不确定)。这种差异可以忽略不计——非常非常微不足道。

然而，你觉得哪个更有可读性是另一回事。这是主观的，因人而异——所以我建议你找出你的团队中大多数人喜欢什么，然后保持一致。我个人觉得“”更容易读。

“”和“”很容易被误认为彼此的论点并不能真正让我接受。除非你使用的是比例字体(我从未与任何使用比例字体的开发人员合作过)，否则很容易看出区别。